SYNA Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Lumentum Holdings has a net margin of 0.67% compared to Synaptics's net margin of -15.14%. Synaptics's return on equity of 12.48% beat Lumentum Holdings's return on equity of -50.46%.

Synaptics has a consensus price target of $97.14, signalling upside risk potential of 103.1%. On the other hand Lumentum Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $95.88 which suggests that it could grow by 87%. Given that Synaptics has higher upside potential than Lumentum Holdings, analysts believe Synaptics is more attractive than Lumentum Holdings.

Synaptics has a beta of 1.602, which suggesting that the stock is 60.186% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lumentum Holdings has a beta of 1.141, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 14.121%.

Synaptics has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Lumentum Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Synaptics pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lumentum Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Synaptics quarterly revenues are $267.2M, which are smaller than Lumentum Holdings quarterly revenues of $402.2M. Synaptics's net income of $1.8M is higher than Lumentum Holdings's net income of -$60.9M. Notably, Synaptics's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.31x while Lumentum Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Synaptics is 1.90x versus 2.47x for Lumentum Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Qualcomm has a net margin of 0.67% compared to Synaptics's net margin of 27.25%. Synaptics's return on equity of 12.48% beat Qualcomm's return on equity of 42.1%.

Synaptics has a consensus price target of $97.14, signalling upside risk potential of 103.1%. On the other hand Qualcomm has an analysts' consensus of $192.45 which suggests that it could grow by 40.16%. Given that Synaptics has higher upside potential than Qualcomm, analysts believe Synaptics is more attractive than Qualcomm.

Synaptics has a beta of 1.602, which suggesting that the stock is 60.186% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Qualcomm has a beta of 1.283, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 28.269%.

Synaptics has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Qualcomm offers a yield of 2.44% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.85 per share. Synaptics pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Qualcomm pays out 36.35% of its earnings as a dividend. Qualcomm's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Synaptics quarterly revenues are $267.2M, which are smaller than Qualcomm quarterly revenues of $11.7B. Synaptics's net income of $1.8M is lower than Qualcomm's net income of $3.2B. Notably, Synaptics's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.31x while Qualcomm's PE ratio is 14.88x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Synaptics is 1.90x versus 3.86x for Qualcomm. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Red Cat Holdings has a net margin of 0.67% compared to Synaptics's net margin of -868.86%. Synaptics's return on equity of 12.48% beat Red Cat Holdings's return on equity of -96.51%.

Synaptics has a consensus price target of $97.14, signalling upside risk potential of 103.1%. On the other hand Red Cat Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $13.33 which suggests that it could grow by 116.45%. Given that Red Cat Holdings has higher upside potential than Synaptics, analysts believe Red Cat Holdings is more attractive than Synaptics.

Synaptics has a beta of 1.602, which suggesting that the stock is 60.186% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Red Cat Holdings has a beta of 0.414, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 58.627%.

Synaptics has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Red Cat Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Synaptics pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Red Cat Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Synaptics quarterly revenues are $267.2M, which are larger than Red Cat Holdings quarterly revenues of $1.5M. Synaptics's net income of $1.8M is higher than Red Cat Holdings's net income of -$13.3M. Notably, Synaptics's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.31x while Red Cat Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Synaptics is 1.90x versus 26.24x for Red Cat Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Stratasys has a net margin of 0.67% compared to Synaptics's net margin of -27.9%. Synaptics's return on equity of 12.48% beat Stratasys's return on equity of -14.23%.

Synaptics has a consensus price target of $97.14, signalling upside risk potential of 103.1%. On the other hand Stratasys has an analysts' consensus of $14.00 which suggests that it could grow by 54.02%. Given that Synaptics has higher upside potential than Stratasys, analysts believe Synaptics is more attractive than Stratasys.

Synaptics has a beta of 1.602, which suggesting that the stock is 60.186% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Stratasys has a beta of 1.441, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 44.121%.

Synaptics has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Stratasys offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Synaptics pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Stratasys pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Synaptics quarterly revenues are $267.2M, which are larger than Stratasys quarterly revenues of $150.4M. Synaptics's net income of $1.8M is higher than Stratasys's net income of -$41.9M. Notably, Synaptics's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.31x while Stratasys's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Synaptics is 1.90x versus 1.13x for Stratasys. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.