RCAT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Key Tronic has a net margin of -868.86% compared to Red Cat Holdings's net margin of -4.32%. Red Cat Holdings's return on equity of -96.51% beat Key Tronic's return on equity of -6.34%.

Red Cat Holdings has a consensus price target of $13.33, signalling upside risk potential of 157.4%. On the other hand Key Tronic has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 300.43%. Given that Key Tronic has higher upside potential than Red Cat Holdings, analysts believe Key Tronic is more attractive than Red Cat Holdings.

Red Cat Holdings has a beta of 0.414, which suggesting that the stock is 58.627% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Key Tronic has a beta of 1.376, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 37.647%.

Red Cat Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Key Tronic offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Red Cat Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Key Tronic pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Red Cat Holdings quarterly revenues are $1.5M, which are smaller than Key Tronic quarterly revenues of $113.9M. Red Cat Holdings's net income of -$13.3M is lower than Key Tronic's net income of -$4.9M. Notably, Red Cat Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Key Tronic's PE ratio is 214.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Red Cat Holdings is 22.07x versus 0.05x for Key Tronic. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Qualcomm has a net margin of -868.86% compared to Red Cat Holdings's net margin of 27.25%. Red Cat Holdings's return on equity of -96.51% beat Qualcomm's return on equity of 42.1%.

Red Cat Holdings has a consensus price target of $13.33, signalling upside risk potential of 157.4%. On the other hand Qualcomm has an analysts' consensus of $192.45 which suggests that it could grow by 41.78%. Given that Red Cat Holdings has higher upside potential than Qualcomm, analysts believe Red Cat Holdings is more attractive than Qualcomm.

Red Cat Holdings has a beta of 0.414, which suggesting that the stock is 58.627% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Qualcomm has a beta of 1.283, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 28.269%.

Red Cat Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Qualcomm offers a yield of 2.51% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.85 per share. Red Cat Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Qualcomm pays out 36.35% of its earnings as a dividend. Qualcomm's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Red Cat Holdings quarterly revenues are $1.5M, which are smaller than Qualcomm quarterly revenues of $11.7B. Red Cat Holdings's net income of -$13.3M is lower than Qualcomm's net income of $3.2B. Notably, Red Cat Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Qualcomm's PE ratio is 14.50x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Red Cat Holdings is 22.07x versus 3.77x for Qualcomm. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Stratasys has a net margin of -868.86% compared to Red Cat Holdings's net margin of -27.9%. Red Cat Holdings's return on equity of -96.51% beat Stratasys's return on equity of -14.23%.

Red Cat Holdings has a consensus price target of $13.33, signalling upside risk potential of 157.4%. On the other hand Stratasys has an analysts' consensus of $14.00 which suggests that it could grow by 50.22%. Given that Red Cat Holdings has higher upside potential than Stratasys, analysts believe Red Cat Holdings is more attractive than Stratasys.

Red Cat Holdings has a beta of 0.414, which suggesting that the stock is 58.627% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Stratasys has a beta of 1.441, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 44.121%.

Red Cat Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Stratasys offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Red Cat Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Stratasys pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Red Cat Holdings quarterly revenues are $1.5M, which are smaller than Stratasys quarterly revenues of $150.4M. Red Cat Holdings's net income of -$13.3M is higher than Stratasys's net income of -$41.9M. Notably, Red Cat Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Stratasys's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Red Cat Holdings is 22.07x versus 1.15x for Stratasys. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

AgEagle Aerial Systems has a net margin of -868.86% compared to Red Cat Holdings's net margin of -105.32%. Red Cat Holdings's return on equity of -96.51% beat AgEagle Aerial Systems's return on equity of -275.7%.

Red Cat Holdings has a consensus price target of $13.33, signalling upside risk potential of 157.4%. On the other hand AgEagle Aerial Systems has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 1636.11%. Given that AgEagle Aerial Systems has higher upside potential than Red Cat Holdings, analysts believe AgEagle Aerial Systems is more attractive than Red Cat Holdings.

Red Cat Holdings has a beta of 0.414, which suggesting that the stock is 58.627% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison AgEagle Aerial Systems has a beta of 4.920, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 392.029%.

Red Cat Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. AgEagle Aerial Systems offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Red Cat Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. AgEagle Aerial Systems pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Red Cat Holdings quarterly revenues are $1.5M, which are smaller than AgEagle Aerial Systems quarterly revenues of $3.3M. Red Cat Holdings's net income of -$13.3M is lower than AgEagle Aerial Systems's net income of -$3.5M. Notably, Red Cat Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while AgEagle Aerial Systems's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Red Cat Holdings is 22.07x versus 0.11x for AgEagle Aerial Systems. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.