SSYS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Lumentum Holdings has a net margin of -27.9% compared to Stratasys's net margin of -15.14%. Stratasys's return on equity of -14.23% beat Lumentum Holdings's return on equity of -50.46%.

Stratasys has a consensus price target of $14.00, signalling upside risk potential of 50.22%. On the other hand Lumentum Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $94.31 which suggests that it could grow by 80.64%. Given that Lumentum Holdings has higher upside potential than Stratasys, analysts believe Lumentum Holdings is more attractive than Stratasys.

Stratasys has a beta of 1.441, which suggesting that the stock is 44.121% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lumentum Holdings has a beta of 1.141, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 14.121%.

Stratasys has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Lumentum Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Stratasys pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lumentum Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Stratasys quarterly revenues are $150.4M, which are smaller than Lumentum Holdings quarterly revenues of $402.2M. Stratasys's net income of -$41.9M is higher than Lumentum Holdings's net income of -$60.9M. Notably, Stratasys's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Lumentum Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Stratasys is 1.15x versus 2.52x for Lumentum Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Qualcomm has a net margin of -27.9% compared to Stratasys's net margin of 27.25%. Stratasys's return on equity of -14.23% beat Qualcomm's return on equity of 42.1%.

Stratasys has a consensus price target of $14.00, signalling upside risk potential of 50.22%. On the other hand Qualcomm has an analysts' consensus of $192.45 which suggests that it could grow by 41.78%. Given that Stratasys has higher upside potential than Qualcomm, analysts believe Stratasys is more attractive than Qualcomm.

Stratasys has a beta of 1.441, which suggesting that the stock is 44.121% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Qualcomm has a beta of 1.283, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 28.269%.

Stratasys has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Qualcomm offers a yield of 2.51% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.85 per share. Stratasys pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Qualcomm pays out 36.35% of its earnings as a dividend. Qualcomm's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Stratasys quarterly revenues are $150.4M, which are smaller than Qualcomm quarterly revenues of $11.7B. Stratasys's net income of -$41.9M is lower than Qualcomm's net income of $3.2B. Notably, Stratasys's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Qualcomm's PE ratio is 14.50x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Stratasys is 1.15x versus 3.77x for Qualcomm. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Red Cat Holdings has a net margin of -27.9% compared to Stratasys's net margin of -868.86%. Stratasys's return on equity of -14.23% beat Red Cat Holdings's return on equity of -96.51%.

Stratasys has a consensus price target of $14.00, signalling upside risk potential of 50.22%. On the other hand Red Cat Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $13.33 which suggests that it could grow by 157.4%. Given that Red Cat Holdings has higher upside potential than Stratasys, analysts believe Red Cat Holdings is more attractive than Stratasys.

Stratasys has a beta of 1.441, which suggesting that the stock is 44.121% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Red Cat Holdings has a beta of 0.414, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 58.627%.

Stratasys has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Red Cat Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Stratasys pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Red Cat Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Stratasys quarterly revenues are $150.4M, which are larger than Red Cat Holdings quarterly revenues of $1.5M. Stratasys's net income of -$41.9M is lower than Red Cat Holdings's net income of -$13.3M. Notably, Stratasys's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Red Cat Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Stratasys is 1.15x versus 22.07x for Red Cat Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Synaptics has a net margin of -27.9% compared to Stratasys's net margin of 0.67%. Stratasys's return on equity of -14.23% beat Synaptics's return on equity of 12.48%.

Stratasys has a consensus price target of $14.00, signalling upside risk potential of 50.22%. On the other hand Synaptics has an analysts' consensus of $97.14 which suggests that it could grow by 102.09%. Given that Synaptics has higher upside potential than Stratasys, analysts believe Synaptics is more attractive than Stratasys.

Stratasys has a beta of 1.441, which suggesting that the stock is 44.121% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Synaptics has a beta of 1.602, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 60.186%.

Stratasys has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Synaptics offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Stratasys pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Synaptics pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Stratasys quarterly revenues are $150.4M, which are smaller than Synaptics quarterly revenues of $267.2M. Stratasys's net income of -$41.9M is lower than Synaptics's net income of $1.8M. Notably, Stratasys's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Synaptics's PE ratio is 11.36x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Stratasys is 1.15x versus 1.91x for Synaptics. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.