KTCC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Qualcomm has a net margin of 0.85% compared to Key Tronic's net margin of 28.51%. Key Tronic's return on equity of -1.56% beat Qualcomm's return on equity of 42.24%.

Key Tronic has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 133.59%. On the other hand Qualcomm has an analysts' consensus of $204.70 which suggests that it could grow by 33.89%. Given that Key Tronic has higher upside potential than Qualcomm, analysts believe Key Tronic is more attractive than Qualcomm.

Key Tronic has a beta of 1.483, which suggesting that the stock is 48.31% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Qualcomm has a beta of 1.255, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.479%.

Key Tronic has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Qualcomm offers a yield of 2.19% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.85 per share. Key Tronic pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Qualcomm pays out 36.35% of its earnings as a dividend. Qualcomm's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Key Tronic quarterly revenues are $131.6M, which are smaller than Qualcomm quarterly revenues of $10.2B. Key Tronic's net income of $1.1M is lower than Qualcomm's net income of $2.9B. Notably, Key Tronic's price-to-earnings ratio is 228.00x while Qualcomm's PE ratio is 17.01x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Key Tronic is 0.08x versus 4.44x for Qualcomm. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Red Cat Holdings has a net margin of 0.85% compared to Key Tronic's net margin of -868.86%. Key Tronic's return on equity of -1.56% beat Red Cat Holdings's return on equity of -96.51%.

Key Tronic has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 133.59%. On the other hand Red Cat Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $13.50 which suggests that it could grow by 25.7%. Given that Key Tronic has higher upside potential than Red Cat Holdings, analysts believe Key Tronic is more attractive than Red Cat Holdings.

Key Tronic has a beta of 1.483, which suggesting that the stock is 48.31% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Red Cat Holdings has a beta of 0.407, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 59.291%.

Key Tronic has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Red Cat Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Key Tronic pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Red Cat Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Key Tronic quarterly revenues are $131.6M, which are larger than Red Cat Holdings quarterly revenues of $1.5M. Key Tronic's net income of $1.1M is higher than Red Cat Holdings's net income of -$13.3M. Notably, Key Tronic's price-to-earnings ratio is 228.00x while Red Cat Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Key Tronic is 0.08x versus 45.75x for Red Cat Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Rigetti Computing has a net margin of 0.85% compared to Key Tronic's net margin of -623.76%. Key Tronic's return on equity of -1.56% beat Rigetti Computing's return on equity of -51.99%.

Key Tronic has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 133.59%. On the other hand Rigetti Computing has an analysts' consensus of $3.50 which suggests that it could fall by -62.84%. Given that Key Tronic has higher upside potential than Rigetti Computing, analysts believe Key Tronic is more attractive than Rigetti Computing.

Key Tronic has a beta of 1.483, which suggesting that the stock is 48.31% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Rigetti Computing has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Key Tronic has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Rigetti Computing offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Key Tronic pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Rigetti Computing pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Key Tronic quarterly revenues are $131.6M, which are larger than Rigetti Computing quarterly revenues of $2.4M. Key Tronic's net income of $1.1M is higher than Rigetti Computing's net income of -$14.8M. Notably, Key Tronic's price-to-earnings ratio is 228.00x while Rigetti Computing's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Key Tronic is 0.08x versus 129.19x for Rigetti Computing. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Stratasys has a net margin of 0.85% compared to Key Tronic's net margin of -19.01%. Key Tronic's return on equity of -1.56% beat Stratasys's return on equity of -10.81%.

Key Tronic has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 133.59%. On the other hand Stratasys has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 24.87%. Given that Key Tronic has higher upside potential than Stratasys, analysts believe Key Tronic is more attractive than Stratasys.

Key Tronic has a beta of 1.483, which suggesting that the stock is 48.31% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Stratasys has a beta of 1.312, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 31.237%.

Key Tronic has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Stratasys offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Key Tronic pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Stratasys pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Key Tronic quarterly revenues are $131.6M, which are smaller than Stratasys quarterly revenues of $140M. Key Tronic's net income of $1.1M is higher than Stratasys's net income of -$26.6M. Notably, Key Tronic's price-to-earnings ratio is 228.00x while Stratasys's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Key Tronic is 0.08x versus 1.15x for Stratasys. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.