Is Micron a Good Stock to Buy Now?
Like most of its peers in the semiconductor industry, Micron…
Sell
35
KC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$11.00
Seasonality move
:
-23.71%
Day range:
$10.76 - $11.50
52-week range:
$2.02 - $22.26
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
2.47x
P/B ratio:
3.81x
Volume:
11M
Avg. volume:
3.9M
1-year change:
323.94%
Market cap:
$2.7B
Revenue:
$1.1B
EPS (TTM):
-$1.13
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
KC
Kingsoft Cloud Holdings
|
$301.9M | -$0.05 | 21.76% | -84.41% | $17.45 |
|
GDS
GDS Holdings
|
$374.6M | -$0.16 | 2.02% | -93.44% | $43.34 |
|
RTC
Baijiayun Group
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
VNET
VNET Group
|
$285.8M | $0.01 | 15.82% | -96.91% | $14.76 |
|
XIACY
Xiaomi
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
YMM
Full Truck Alliance
|
$366.5M | $0.17 | 15.6% | 104.44% | $15.84 |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
KC
Kingsoft Cloud Holdings
|
$10.98 | $17.45 | $2.7B | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 2.47x |
|
GDS
GDS Holdings
|
$19.82 | $43.34 | $3.9B | 7.86x | $0.00 | 0% | 2.36x |
|
RTC
Baijiayun Group
|
$0.22 | -- | $5.5M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.08x |
|
VNET
VNET Group
|
$4.74 | $14.76 | $1.3B | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 1.12x |
|
XIACY
Xiaomi
|
$26.49 | -- | $133B | 57.65x | $0.00 | 0% | 3.04x |
|
YMM
Full Truck Alliance
|
$10.02 | $15.84 | $10.5B | 23.96x | $0.10 | 0.96% | 6.69x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
KC
Kingsoft Cloud Holdings
|
42.92% | 4.055 | 20.28% | 0.49x |
|
GDS
GDS Holdings
|
59.67% | -0.218 | 99.7% | 1.23x |
|
RTC
Baijiayun Group
|
38.46% | 0.645 | 17.91% | 1.09x |
|
VNET
VNET Group
|
64.71% | 2.629 | 119.15% | 0.37x |
|
XIACY
Xiaomi
|
14.8% | -0.377 | -- | 1.12x |
|
YMM
Full Truck Alliance
|
-- | -0.772 | -- | 8.29x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
KC
Kingsoft Cloud Holdings
|
$59.2M | -$6M | -22.9% | -29.94% | -6.39% | $79.5M |
|
GDS
GDS Holdings
|
$80.3M | $39.1M | 5.58% | 15.3% | 11.87% | $622.8M |
|
RTC
Baijiayun Group
|
-- | -- | -114.32% | -137.67% | -- | -- |
|
VNET
VNET Group
|
$70.2M | $32.9M | 1.05% | 2.74% | 7.21% | -$139.6M |
|
XIACY
Xiaomi
|
$2.6B | $768.9M | 10.21% | 10.33% | 7.54% | -- |
|
YMM
Full Truck Alliance
|
$247.7M | $116.1M | 8.41% | 8.41% | 26.32% | -- |
Kingsoft Cloud Holdings vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns KC or GDS?
GDS Holdings has a net margin of -8.82% compared to Kingsoft Cloud Holdings's net margin of -6.49%. Kingsoft Cloud Holdings's return on equity of -29.94% beat GDS Holdings's return on equity of 15.3%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital KCKingsoft Cloud Holdings19.08% -$0.10 $1.3B GDSGDS Holdings21.49% $3.12 $8B -
What do Analysts Say About KC or GDS?
Kingsoft Cloud Holdings has a consensus price target of $17.45, signalling upside risk potential of 58.91%. On the other hand GDS Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $43.34 which suggests that it could grow by 118.65%. Given that GDS Holdings has higher upside potential than Kingsoft Cloud Holdings, analysts believe GDS Holdings is more attractive than Kingsoft Cloud Holdings.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings KCKingsoft Cloud Holdings5 3 0 GDSGDS Holdings11 2 0 -
Is KC or GDS More Risky?
Kingsoft Cloud Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison GDS Holdings has a beta of 0.234, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 76.645%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock KC or GDS?
Kingsoft Cloud Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. GDS Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Kingsoft Cloud Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. GDS Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios KC or GDS?
Kingsoft Cloud Holdings quarterly revenues are $310.2M, which are smaller than GDS Holdings quarterly revenues of $374M. Kingsoft Cloud Holdings's net income of -$27.4M is lower than GDS Holdings's net income of $582.2M. Notably, Kingsoft Cloud Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while GDS Holdings's PE ratio is 7.86x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kingsoft Cloud Holdings is 2.47x versus 2.36x for GDS Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income KCKingsoft Cloud Holdings2.47x -- $310.2M -$27.4M GDSGDS Holdings2.36x 7.86x $374M $582.2M
-
Which has Higher Returns KC or RTC?
Baijiayun Group has a net margin of -8.82% compared to Kingsoft Cloud Holdings's net margin of --. Kingsoft Cloud Holdings's return on equity of -29.94% beat Baijiayun Group's return on equity of -137.67%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital KCKingsoft Cloud Holdings19.08% -$0.10 $1.3B RTCBaijiayun Group-- -- $41.7M -
What do Analysts Say About KC or RTC?
Kingsoft Cloud Holdings has a consensus price target of $17.45, signalling upside risk potential of 58.91%. On the other hand Baijiayun Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 5481.4%. Given that Baijiayun Group has higher upside potential than Kingsoft Cloud Holdings, analysts believe Baijiayun Group is more attractive than Kingsoft Cloud Holdings.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings KCKingsoft Cloud Holdings5 3 0 RTCBaijiayun Group0 0 0 -
Is KC or RTC More Risky?
Kingsoft Cloud Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Baijiayun Group has a beta of 1.059, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.931%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock KC or RTC?
Kingsoft Cloud Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Baijiayun Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Kingsoft Cloud Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Baijiayun Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios KC or RTC?
Kingsoft Cloud Holdings quarterly revenues are $310.2M, which are larger than Baijiayun Group quarterly revenues of --. Kingsoft Cloud Holdings's net income of -$27.4M is higher than Baijiayun Group's net income of --. Notably, Kingsoft Cloud Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Baijiayun Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kingsoft Cloud Holdings is 2.47x versus 0.08x for Baijiayun Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income KCKingsoft Cloud Holdings2.47x -- $310.2M -$27.4M RTCBaijiayun Group0.08x -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns KC or VNET?
VNET Group has a net margin of -8.82% compared to Kingsoft Cloud Holdings's net margin of -0.49%. Kingsoft Cloud Holdings's return on equity of -29.94% beat VNET Group's return on equity of 2.74%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital KCKingsoft Cloud Holdings19.08% -$0.10 $1.3B VNETVNET Group22.47% -$0.01 $2.5B -
What do Analysts Say About KC or VNET?
Kingsoft Cloud Holdings has a consensus price target of $17.45, signalling upside risk potential of 58.91%. On the other hand VNET Group has an analysts' consensus of $14.76 which suggests that it could grow by 213.3%. Given that VNET Group has higher upside potential than Kingsoft Cloud Holdings, analysts believe VNET Group is more attractive than Kingsoft Cloud Holdings.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings KCKingsoft Cloud Holdings5 3 0 VNETVNET Group7 1 0 -
Is KC or VNET More Risky?
Kingsoft Cloud Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison VNET Group has a beta of 0.147, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 85.27%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock KC or VNET?
Kingsoft Cloud Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. VNET Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Kingsoft Cloud Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. VNET Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios KC or VNET?
Kingsoft Cloud Holdings quarterly revenues are $310.2M, which are smaller than VNET Group quarterly revenues of $312.2M. Kingsoft Cloud Holdings's net income of -$27.4M is lower than VNET Group's net income of -$1.5M. Notably, Kingsoft Cloud Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while VNET Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kingsoft Cloud Holdings is 2.47x versus 1.12x for VNET Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income KCKingsoft Cloud Holdings2.47x -- $310.2M -$27.4M VNETVNET Group1.12x -- $312.2M -$1.5M
-
Which has Higher Returns KC or XIACY?
Xiaomi has a net margin of -8.82% compared to Kingsoft Cloud Holdings's net margin of 5.79%. Kingsoft Cloud Holdings's return on equity of -29.94% beat Xiaomi's return on equity of 10.33%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital KCKingsoft Cloud Holdings19.08% -$0.10 $1.3B XIACYXiaomi20.41% $0.15 $28B -
What do Analysts Say About KC or XIACY?
Kingsoft Cloud Holdings has a consensus price target of $17.45, signalling upside risk potential of 58.91%. On the other hand Xiaomi has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Kingsoft Cloud Holdings has higher upside potential than Xiaomi, analysts believe Kingsoft Cloud Holdings is more attractive than Xiaomi.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings KCKingsoft Cloud Holdings5 3 0 XIACYXiaomi0 0 0 -
Is KC or XIACY More Risky?
Kingsoft Cloud Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Xiaomi has a beta of 0.990, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.03%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock KC or XIACY?
Kingsoft Cloud Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Xiaomi offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Kingsoft Cloud Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Xiaomi pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios KC or XIACY?
Kingsoft Cloud Holdings quarterly revenues are $310.2M, which are smaller than Xiaomi quarterly revenues of $12.9B. Kingsoft Cloud Holdings's net income of -$27.4M is lower than Xiaomi's net income of $747.5M. Notably, Kingsoft Cloud Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Xiaomi's PE ratio is 57.65x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kingsoft Cloud Holdings is 2.47x versus 3.04x for Xiaomi. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income KCKingsoft Cloud Holdings2.47x -- $310.2M -$27.4M XIACYXiaomi3.04x 57.65x $12.9B $747.5M
-
Which has Higher Returns KC or YMM?
Full Truck Alliance has a net margin of -8.82% compared to Kingsoft Cloud Holdings's net margin of 17.59%. Kingsoft Cloud Holdings's return on equity of -29.94% beat Full Truck Alliance's return on equity of 8.41%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital KCKingsoft Cloud Holdings19.08% -$0.10 $1.3B YMMFull Truck Alliance56.16% $0.08 $5.2B -
What do Analysts Say About KC or YMM?
Kingsoft Cloud Holdings has a consensus price target of $17.45, signalling upside risk potential of 58.91%. On the other hand Full Truck Alliance has an analysts' consensus of $15.84 which suggests that it could grow by 58.09%. Given that Kingsoft Cloud Holdings has higher upside potential than Full Truck Alliance, analysts believe Kingsoft Cloud Holdings is more attractive than Full Truck Alliance.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings KCKingsoft Cloud Holdings5 3 0 YMMFull Truck Alliance10 2 0 -
Is KC or YMM More Risky?
Kingsoft Cloud Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Full Truck Alliance has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock KC or YMM?
Kingsoft Cloud Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Full Truck Alliance offers a yield of 0.96% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. Kingsoft Cloud Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Full Truck Alliance pays out 34.67% of its earnings as a dividend. Full Truck Alliance's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios KC or YMM?
Kingsoft Cloud Holdings quarterly revenues are $310.2M, which are smaller than Full Truck Alliance quarterly revenues of $441.2M. Kingsoft Cloud Holdings's net income of -$27.4M is lower than Full Truck Alliance's net income of $77.6M. Notably, Kingsoft Cloud Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Full Truck Alliance's PE ratio is 23.96x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kingsoft Cloud Holdings is 2.47x versus 6.69x for Full Truck Alliance. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income KCKingsoft Cloud Holdings2.47x -- $310.2M -$27.4M YMMFull Truck Alliance6.69x 23.96x $441.2M $77.6M
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is Uber Finally on the Path to Consistent Profitability?
After posting massive losses quarter after quarter for years, Uber…
How High Will MSTY Go By 2030?
YieldMax’s MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (MSTY) is a high-yield…
Stock Ideas
Sell
48
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $2.9T
P/E Ratio: 32x
Sell
46
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $2.8T
P/E Ratio: 31x
Sell
42
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $2.5T
P/E Ratio: 36x
Alerts
Sell
25
BULZ alert for Apr 17
MicroSectors Solactive FANG & Innov 3X Levd ETN [BULZ] is down 10.95% over the past day.
Sell
50
IBKR alert for Apr 17
Interactive Brokers Group [IBKR] is down 8.97% over the past day.
Sell
39
FNGA alert for Apr 17
MicroSectors FANG+ Index 3X Leveraged ETN [FNGA] is down 9.37% over the past day.
