Will NVIDIA Stock Bounce Back?
After the wild market moves during February and March, investors…
Sell
31
GDS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$20.69
Seasonality move
:
19.93%
Day range:
$20.38 - $22.08
52-week range:
$5.86 - $52.50
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
8.09x
P/S ratio:
2.43x
P/B ratio:
1.29x
Volume:
2.5M
Avg. volume:
4M
1-year change:
233.88%
Market cap:
$4B
Revenue:
$1.4B
EPS (TTM):
$2.52
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
GDS
GDS Holdings
|
$374.6M | -$0.16 | 2.02% | -93.44% | $43.34 |
|
KC
Kingsoft Cloud Holdings
|
$301.2M | -$0.05 | 12.81% | -74.96% | $17.45 |
|
RTC
Baijiayun Group
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
TAOP
Taoping
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
UTSI
UTStarcom Holdings
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
VNET
VNET Group
|
$285.8M | $0.01 | 15.82% | -96.91% | $14.85 |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
GDS
GDS Holdings
|
$20.40 | $43.34 | $4B | 8.09x | $0.00 | 0% | 2.43x |
|
KC
Kingsoft Cloud Holdings
|
$14.05 | $17.45 | $3.3B | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 3.16x |
|
RTC
Baijiayun Group
|
$0.23 | -- | $5.8M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.09x |
|
TAOP
Taoping
|
$0.24 | -- | $3.2M | 0.41x | $0.00 | 0% | 0.01x |
|
UTSI
UTStarcom Holdings
|
$2.10 | -- | $19.8M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 1.77x |
|
VNET
VNET Group
|
$5.50 | $14.85 | $1.5B | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 1.30x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
GDS
GDS Holdings
|
59.67% | -0.218 | 99.7% | 1.23x |
|
KC
Kingsoft Cloud Holdings
|
42.92% | 4.055 | 20.28% | 0.49x |
|
RTC
Baijiayun Group
|
38.46% | 0.645 | 17.91% | 1.09x |
|
TAOP
Taoping
|
34.39% | -1.494 | 178.55% | 0.45x |
|
UTSI
UTStarcom Holdings
|
-- | 0.129 | -- | 2.32x |
|
VNET
VNET Group
|
64.71% | 2.629 | 119.15% | 0.37x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
GDS
GDS Holdings
|
$80.3M | $39.1M | 5.58% | 15.3% | 11.87% | $622.8M |
|
KC
Kingsoft Cloud Holdings
|
$59.2M | -$6M | -22.9% | -29.94% | -6.39% | $79.5M |
|
RTC
Baijiayun Group
|
-- | -- | -114.32% | -137.67% | -- | -- |
|
TAOP
Taoping
|
-- | -- | 8.21% | 13.4% | -- | -- |
|
UTSI
UTStarcom Holdings
|
-- | -- | -9.04% | -9.04% | -- | -- |
|
VNET
VNET Group
|
$70.2M | $32.9M | 1.05% | 2.74% | 7.21% | -$139.6M |
GDS Holdings vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns GDS or KC?
Kingsoft Cloud Holdings has a net margin of -6.49% compared to GDS Holdings's net margin of -8.82%. GDS Holdings's return on equity of 15.3% beat Kingsoft Cloud Holdings's return on equity of -29.94%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital GDSGDS Holdings21.49% $3.12 $8B KCKingsoft Cloud Holdings19.08% -$0.10 $1.3B -
What do Analysts Say About GDS or KC?
GDS Holdings has a consensus price target of $43.34, signalling upside risk potential of 112.44%. On the other hand Kingsoft Cloud Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $17.45 which suggests that it could grow by 23.77%. Given that GDS Holdings has higher upside potential than Kingsoft Cloud Holdings, analysts believe GDS Holdings is more attractive than Kingsoft Cloud Holdings.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings GDSGDS Holdings11 2 0 KCKingsoft Cloud Holdings5 3 0 -
Is GDS or KC More Risky?
GDS Holdings has a beta of 0.234, which suggesting that the stock is 76.645% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kingsoft Cloud Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock GDS or KC?
GDS Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Kingsoft Cloud Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. GDS Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Kingsoft Cloud Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios GDS or KC?
GDS Holdings quarterly revenues are $374M, which are larger than Kingsoft Cloud Holdings quarterly revenues of $310.2M. GDS Holdings's net income of $582.2M is higher than Kingsoft Cloud Holdings's net income of -$27.4M. Notably, GDS Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.09x while Kingsoft Cloud Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for GDS Holdings is 2.43x versus 3.16x for Kingsoft Cloud Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income GDSGDS Holdings2.43x 8.09x $374M $582.2M KCKingsoft Cloud Holdings3.16x -- $310.2M -$27.4M
-
Which has Higher Returns GDS or RTC?
Baijiayun Group has a net margin of -6.49% compared to GDS Holdings's net margin of --. GDS Holdings's return on equity of 15.3% beat Baijiayun Group's return on equity of -137.67%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital GDSGDS Holdings21.49% $3.12 $8B RTCBaijiayun Group-- -- $41.7M -
What do Analysts Say About GDS or RTC?
GDS Holdings has a consensus price target of $43.34, signalling upside risk potential of 112.44%. On the other hand Baijiayun Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 5165.47%. Given that Baijiayun Group has higher upside potential than GDS Holdings, analysts believe Baijiayun Group is more attractive than GDS Holdings.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings GDSGDS Holdings11 2 0 RTCBaijiayun Group0 0 0 -
Is GDS or RTC More Risky?
GDS Holdings has a beta of 0.234, which suggesting that the stock is 76.645% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Baijiayun Group has a beta of 1.059, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.931%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock GDS or RTC?
GDS Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Baijiayun Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. GDS Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Baijiayun Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios GDS or RTC?
GDS Holdings quarterly revenues are $374M, which are larger than Baijiayun Group quarterly revenues of --. GDS Holdings's net income of $582.2M is higher than Baijiayun Group's net income of --. Notably, GDS Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.09x while Baijiayun Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for GDS Holdings is 2.43x versus 0.09x for Baijiayun Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income GDSGDS Holdings2.43x 8.09x $374M $582.2M RTCBaijiayun Group0.09x -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns GDS or TAOP?
Taoping has a net margin of -6.49% compared to GDS Holdings's net margin of --. GDS Holdings's return on equity of 15.3% beat Taoping's return on equity of 13.4%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital GDSGDS Holdings21.49% $3.12 $8B TAOPTaoping-- -- $24.1M -
What do Analysts Say About GDS or TAOP?
GDS Holdings has a consensus price target of $43.34, signalling upside risk potential of 112.44%. On the other hand Taoping has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 29561.02%. Given that Taoping has higher upside potential than GDS Holdings, analysts believe Taoping is more attractive than GDS Holdings.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings GDSGDS Holdings11 2 0 TAOPTaoping0 0 0 -
Is GDS or TAOP More Risky?
GDS Holdings has a beta of 0.234, which suggesting that the stock is 76.645% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Taoping has a beta of 0.417, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 58.328%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock GDS or TAOP?
GDS Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Taoping offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. GDS Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Taoping pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios GDS or TAOP?
GDS Holdings quarterly revenues are $374M, which are larger than Taoping quarterly revenues of --. GDS Holdings's net income of $582.2M is higher than Taoping's net income of --. Notably, GDS Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.09x while Taoping's PE ratio is 0.41x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for GDS Holdings is 2.43x versus 0.01x for Taoping. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income GDSGDS Holdings2.43x 8.09x $374M $582.2M TAOPTaoping0.01x 0.41x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns GDS or UTSI?
UTStarcom Holdings has a net margin of -6.49% compared to GDS Holdings's net margin of --. GDS Holdings's return on equity of 15.3% beat UTStarcom Holdings's return on equity of -9.04%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital GDSGDS Holdings21.49% $3.12 $8B UTSIUTStarcom Holdings-- -- $45.2M -
What do Analysts Say About GDS or UTSI?
GDS Holdings has a consensus price target of $43.34, signalling upside risk potential of 112.44%. On the other hand UTStarcom Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 376.19%. Given that UTStarcom Holdings has higher upside potential than GDS Holdings, analysts believe UTStarcom Holdings is more attractive than GDS Holdings.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings GDSGDS Holdings11 2 0 UTSIUTStarcom Holdings0 0 0 -
Is GDS or UTSI More Risky?
GDS Holdings has a beta of 0.234, which suggesting that the stock is 76.645% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison UTStarcom Holdings has a beta of 0.158, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 84.194%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock GDS or UTSI?
GDS Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. UTStarcom Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. GDS Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. UTStarcom Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios GDS or UTSI?
GDS Holdings quarterly revenues are $374M, which are larger than UTStarcom Holdings quarterly revenues of --. GDS Holdings's net income of $582.2M is higher than UTStarcom Holdings's net income of --. Notably, GDS Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.09x while UTStarcom Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for GDS Holdings is 2.43x versus 1.77x for UTStarcom Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income GDSGDS Holdings2.43x 8.09x $374M $582.2M UTSIUTStarcom Holdings1.77x -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns GDS or VNET?
VNET Group has a net margin of -6.49% compared to GDS Holdings's net margin of -0.49%. GDS Holdings's return on equity of 15.3% beat VNET Group's return on equity of 2.74%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital GDSGDS Holdings21.49% $3.12 $8B VNETVNET Group22.47% -$0.01 $2.5B -
What do Analysts Say About GDS or VNET?
GDS Holdings has a consensus price target of $43.34, signalling upside risk potential of 112.44%. On the other hand VNET Group has an analysts' consensus of $14.85 which suggests that it could grow by 170.01%. Given that VNET Group has higher upside potential than GDS Holdings, analysts believe VNET Group is more attractive than GDS Holdings.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings GDSGDS Holdings11 2 0 VNETVNET Group7 0 0 -
Is GDS or VNET More Risky?
GDS Holdings has a beta of 0.234, which suggesting that the stock is 76.645% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison VNET Group has a beta of 0.147, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 85.27%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock GDS or VNET?
GDS Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. VNET Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. GDS Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. VNET Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios GDS or VNET?
GDS Holdings quarterly revenues are $374M, which are larger than VNET Group quarterly revenues of $312.2M. GDS Holdings's net income of $582.2M is higher than VNET Group's net income of -$1.5M. Notably, GDS Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.09x while VNET Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for GDS Holdings is 2.43x versus 1.30x for VNET Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income GDSGDS Holdings2.43x 8.09x $374M $582.2M VNETVNET Group1.30x -- $312.2M -$1.5M
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is Energy Transfer a Good Dividend Stock to Buy Now?
Energy Transfer (NYSE:ET) offers an impressive yield, to say the…
Did the Market Bottom Already?
The past few weeks have been among the most volatile…
Stock Ideas
Buy
53
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3T
P/E Ratio: 33x
Buy
54
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $2.9T
P/E Ratio: 33x
Buy
52
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $2.7T
P/E Ratio: 38x
Alerts
Buy
78
BMA alert for Apr 15
Banco Macro SA [BMA] is down 1.29% over the past day.
Buy
72
BKTI alert for Apr 15
BK Technologies [BKTI] is down 1.03% over the past day.
Buy
71
GGAL alert for Apr 15
Grupo Financiero Galicia SA [GGAL] is down 1.51% over the past day.
