XIACY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Kingsoft Cloud Holdings has a net margin of 5.79% compared to Xiaomi's net margin of -8.82%. Xiaomi's return on equity of 10.33% beat Kingsoft Cloud Holdings's return on equity of -29.94%.

Xiaomi has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Kingsoft Cloud Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $17.45 which suggests that it could grow by 22.71%. Given that Kingsoft Cloud Holdings has higher upside potential than Xiaomi, analysts believe Kingsoft Cloud Holdings is more attractive than Xiaomi.

Xiaomi has a beta of 0.990, which suggesting that the stock is 1.03% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kingsoft Cloud Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Xiaomi has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Kingsoft Cloud Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Xiaomi pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Kingsoft Cloud Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Xiaomi quarterly revenues are $12.9B, which are larger than Kingsoft Cloud Holdings quarterly revenues of $310.2M. Xiaomi's net income of $747.5M is higher than Kingsoft Cloud Holdings's net income of -$27.4M. Notably, Xiaomi's price-to-earnings ratio is 57.65x while Kingsoft Cloud Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Xiaomi is 3.32x versus 3.20x for Kingsoft Cloud Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Baijiayun Group has a net margin of 5.79% compared to Xiaomi's net margin of --. Xiaomi's return on equity of 10.33% beat Baijiayun Group's return on equity of -137.67%.

Xiaomi has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Baijiayun Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 5672.01%. Given that Baijiayun Group has higher upside potential than Xiaomi, analysts believe Baijiayun Group is more attractive than Xiaomi.

Xiaomi has a beta of 0.990, which suggesting that the stock is 1.03% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Baijiayun Group has a beta of 1.059, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.931%.

Xiaomi has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Baijiayun Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Xiaomi pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Baijiayun Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Xiaomi quarterly revenues are $12.9B, which are larger than Baijiayun Group quarterly revenues of --. Xiaomi's net income of $747.5M is higher than Baijiayun Group's net income of --. Notably, Xiaomi's price-to-earnings ratio is 57.65x while Baijiayun Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Xiaomi is 3.32x versus 0.08x for Baijiayun Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

UTStarcom Holdings has a net margin of 5.79% compared to Xiaomi's net margin of --. Xiaomi's return on equity of 10.33% beat UTStarcom Holdings's return on equity of -9.04%.

Xiaomi has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand UTStarcom Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 331.04%. Given that UTStarcom Holdings has higher upside potential than Xiaomi, analysts believe UTStarcom Holdings is more attractive than Xiaomi.

Xiaomi has a beta of 0.990, which suggesting that the stock is 1.03% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison UTStarcom Holdings has a beta of 0.158, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 84.194%.

Xiaomi has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. UTStarcom Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Xiaomi pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. UTStarcom Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Xiaomi quarterly revenues are $12.9B, which are larger than UTStarcom Holdings quarterly revenues of --. Xiaomi's net income of $747.5M is higher than UTStarcom Holdings's net income of --. Notably, Xiaomi's price-to-earnings ratio is 57.65x while UTStarcom Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Xiaomi is 3.32x versus 1.95x for UTStarcom Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Full Truck Alliance has a net margin of 5.79% compared to Xiaomi's net margin of 17.59%. Xiaomi's return on equity of 10.33% beat Full Truck Alliance's return on equity of 8.41%.

Xiaomi has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Full Truck Alliance has an analysts' consensus of $16.30 which suggests that it could grow by 68.54%. Given that Full Truck Alliance has higher upside potential than Xiaomi, analysts believe Full Truck Alliance is more attractive than Xiaomi.

Xiaomi has a beta of 0.990, which suggesting that the stock is 1.03% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Full Truck Alliance has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Xiaomi has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Full Truck Alliance offers a yield of 0.99% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. Xiaomi pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Full Truck Alliance pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Xiaomi quarterly revenues are $12.9B, which are larger than Full Truck Alliance quarterly revenues of $441.2M. Xiaomi's net income of $747.5M is higher than Full Truck Alliance's net income of $77.6M. Notably, Xiaomi's price-to-earnings ratio is 57.65x while Full Truck Alliance's PE ratio is 23.13x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Xiaomi is 3.32x versus 6.45x for Full Truck Alliance. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.