SJM Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

B&G Foods has a net margin of -1.08% compared to JM Smucker's net margin of 1.62%. JM Smucker's return on equity of 6.97% beat B&G Foods's return on equity of -3.3%.

JM Smucker has a consensus price target of $126.49, signalling upside risk potential of 14.35%. On the other hand B&G Foods has an analysts' consensus of $8.07 which suggests that it could grow by 13.84%. Given that JM Smucker has higher upside potential than B&G Foods, analysts believe JM Smucker is more attractive than B&G Foods.

JM Smucker has a beta of 0.263, which suggesting that the stock is 73.674% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison B&G Foods has a beta of 0.537, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 46.269%.

JM Smucker has a quarterly dividend of $1.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.87%. B&G Foods offers a yield of 10.72% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share. JM Smucker pays 58.8% of its earnings as a dividend. B&G Foods pays out -84.61% of its earnings as a dividend. JM Smucker's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

JM Smucker quarterly revenues are $2.3B, which are larger than B&G Foods quarterly revenues of $461.1M. JM Smucker's net income of -$24.5M is lower than B&G Foods's net income of $7.5M. Notably, JM Smucker's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.39x while B&G Foods's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for JM Smucker is 1.33x versus 0.29x for B&G Foods. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Conagra Brands has a net margin of -1.08% compared to JM Smucker's net margin of 8.9%. JM Smucker's return on equity of 6.97% beat Conagra Brands's return on equity of 5.56%.

JM Smucker has a consensus price target of $126.49, signalling upside risk potential of 14.35%. On the other hand Conagra Brands has an analysts' consensus of $29.59 which suggests that it could grow by 6.98%. Given that JM Smucker has higher upside potential than Conagra Brands, analysts believe JM Smucker is more attractive than Conagra Brands.

JM Smucker has a beta of 0.263, which suggesting that the stock is 73.674% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Conagra Brands has a beta of 0.311, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 68.91%.

JM Smucker has a quarterly dividend of $1.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.87%. Conagra Brands offers a yield of 5.06% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share. JM Smucker pays 58.8% of its earnings as a dividend. Conagra Brands pays out 189.89% of its earnings as a dividend. JM Smucker's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Conagra Brands's is not.

JM Smucker quarterly revenues are $2.3B, which are smaller than Conagra Brands quarterly revenues of $3.2B. JM Smucker's net income of -$24.5M is lower than Conagra Brands's net income of $284.5M. Notably, JM Smucker's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.39x while Conagra Brands's PE ratio is 27.12x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for JM Smucker is 1.33x versus 1.11x for Conagra Brands. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Campbell Soup has a net margin of -1.08% compared to JM Smucker's net margin of 7.86%. JM Smucker's return on equity of 6.97% beat Campbell Soup's return on equity of 14.38%.

JM Smucker has a consensus price target of $126.49, signalling upside risk potential of 14.35%. On the other hand Campbell Soup has an analysts' consensus of $49.11 which suggests that it could grow by 17.45%. Given that Campbell Soup has higher upside potential than JM Smucker, analysts believe Campbell Soup is more attractive than JM Smucker.

JM Smucker has a beta of 0.263, which suggesting that the stock is 73.674% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Campbell Soup has a beta of 0.180, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 82.005%.

JM Smucker has a quarterly dividend of $1.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.87%. Campbell Soup offers a yield of 3.54% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.37 per share. JM Smucker pays 58.8% of its earnings as a dividend. Campbell Soup pays out 78.48% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

JM Smucker quarterly revenues are $2.3B, which are smaller than Campbell Soup quarterly revenues of $2.8B. JM Smucker's net income of -$24.5M is lower than Campbell Soup's net income of $218M. Notably, JM Smucker's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.39x while Campbell Soup's PE ratio is 22.85x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for JM Smucker is 1.33x versus 1.27x for Campbell Soup. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Seneca Foods has a net margin of -1.08% compared to JM Smucker's net margin of 3.13%. JM Smucker's return on equity of 6.97% beat Seneca Foods's return on equity of 7.02%.

JM Smucker has a consensus price target of $126.49, signalling upside risk potential of 14.35%. On the other hand Seneca Foods has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that JM Smucker has higher upside potential than Seneca Foods, analysts believe JM Smucker is more attractive than Seneca Foods.

JM Smucker has a beta of 0.263, which suggesting that the stock is 73.674% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Seneca Foods has a beta of 0.290, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 71.018%.

JM Smucker has a quarterly dividend of $1.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.87%. Seneca Foods offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. JM Smucker pays 58.8% of its earnings as a dividend. Seneca Foods pays out 0.04% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

JM Smucker quarterly revenues are $2.3B, which are larger than Seneca Foods quarterly revenues of $425.5M. JM Smucker's net income of -$24.5M is lower than Seneca Foods's net income of $13.3M. Notably, JM Smucker's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.39x while Seneca Foods's PE ratio is 13.22x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for JM Smucker is 1.33x versus 0.37x for Seneca Foods. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.