CAG Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

General Mills has a net margin of 8.9% compared to Conagra Brands's net margin of 15.19%. Conagra Brands's return on equity of 5.56% beat General Mills's return on equity of 27.15%.

Conagra Brands has a consensus price target of $29.59, signalling upside risk potential of 7.41%. On the other hand General Mills has an analysts' consensus of $71.06 which suggests that it could grow by 11.45%. Given that General Mills has higher upside potential than Conagra Brands, analysts believe General Mills is more attractive than Conagra Brands.

Conagra Brands has a beta of 0.311, which suggesting that the stock is 68.91% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison General Mills has a beta of 0.098, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 90.21%.

Conagra Brands has a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.08%. General Mills offers a yield of 3.73% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.60 per share. Conagra Brands pays 189.89% of its earnings as a dividend. General Mills pays out 54.61% of its earnings as a dividend. General Mills's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Conagra Brands's is not.

Conagra Brands quarterly revenues are $3.2B, which are smaller than General Mills quarterly revenues of $5.2B. Conagra Brands's net income of $284.5M is lower than General Mills's net income of $795.7M. Notably, Conagra Brands's price-to-earnings ratio is 27.01x while General Mills's PE ratio is 13.86x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Conagra Brands is 1.11x versus 1.82x for General Mills. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lamb Weston Holdings has a net margin of 8.9% compared to Conagra Brands's net margin of -2.26%. Conagra Brands's return on equity of 5.56% beat Lamb Weston Holdings's return on equity of 21.14%.

Conagra Brands has a consensus price target of $29.59, signalling upside risk potential of 7.41%. On the other hand Lamb Weston Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $69.79 which suggests that it could grow by 6.91%. Given that Conagra Brands has higher upside potential than Lamb Weston Holdings, analysts believe Conagra Brands is more attractive than Lamb Weston Holdings.

Conagra Brands has a beta of 0.311, which suggesting that the stock is 68.91% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lamb Weston Holdings has a beta of 0.702, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.79%.

Conagra Brands has a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.08%. Lamb Weston Holdings offers a yield of 2.21% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.36 per share. Conagra Brands pays 189.89% of its earnings as a dividend. Lamb Weston Holdings pays out 23.98% of its earnings as a dividend. Lamb Weston Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Conagra Brands's is not.

Conagra Brands quarterly revenues are $3.2B, which are larger than Lamb Weston Holdings quarterly revenues of $1.6B. Conagra Brands's net income of $284.5M is higher than Lamb Weston Holdings's net income of -$36.1M. Notably, Conagra Brands's price-to-earnings ratio is 27.01x while Lamb Weston Holdings's PE ratio is 25.80x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Conagra Brands is 1.11x versus 1.49x for Lamb Weston Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

McCormick & has a net margin of 8.9% compared to Conagra Brands's net margin of 11.21%. Conagra Brands's return on equity of 5.56% beat McCormick &'s return on equity of 14.38%.

Conagra Brands has a consensus price target of $29.59, signalling upside risk potential of 7.41%. On the other hand McCormick & has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 9.09%. Given that McCormick & has higher upside potential than Conagra Brands, analysts believe McCormick & is more attractive than Conagra Brands.

Conagra Brands has a beta of 0.311, which suggesting that the stock is 68.91% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison McCormick & has a beta of 0.755, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 24.516%.

Conagra Brands has a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.08%. McCormick & offers a yield of 2.16% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.42 per share. Conagra Brands pays 189.89% of its earnings as a dividend. McCormick & pays out 61.49% of its earnings as a dividend. McCormick &'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Conagra Brands's is not.

Conagra Brands quarterly revenues are $3.2B, which are larger than McCormick & quarterly revenues of $1.6B. Conagra Brands's net income of $284.5M is higher than McCormick &'s net income of $184.2M. Notably, Conagra Brands's price-to-earnings ratio is 27.01x while McCormick &'s PE ratio is 26.47x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Conagra Brands is 1.11x versus 3.14x for McCormick &. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Constellation Brands has a net margin of 8.9% compared to Conagra Brands's net margin of 32.95%. Conagra Brands's return on equity of 5.56% beat Constellation Brands's return on equity of 25.15%.

Conagra Brands has a consensus price target of $29.59, signalling upside risk potential of 7.41%. On the other hand Constellation Brands has an analysts' consensus of $289.20 which suggests that it could grow by 28.31%. Given that Constellation Brands has higher upside potential than Conagra Brands, analysts believe Constellation Brands is more attractive than Conagra Brands.

Conagra Brands has a beta of 0.311, which suggesting that the stock is 68.91% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Constellation Brands has a beta of 0.902, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.805%.

Conagra Brands has a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.08%. Constellation Brands offers a yield of 1.74% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.01 per share. Conagra Brands pays 189.89% of its earnings as a dividend. Constellation Brands pays out 37.85% of its earnings as a dividend. Constellation Brands's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Conagra Brands's is not.

Conagra Brands quarterly revenues are $3.2B, which are larger than Constellation Brands quarterly revenues of $2.7B. Conagra Brands's net income of $284.5M is lower than Constellation Brands's net income of $877M. Notably, Conagra Brands's price-to-earnings ratio is 27.01x while Constellation Brands's PE ratio is 72.95x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Conagra Brands is 1.11x versus 4.05x for Constellation Brands. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.