LW Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Conagra Brands has a net margin of -2.26% compared to Lamb Weston Holdings's net margin of 8.9%. Lamb Weston Holdings's return on equity of 21.14% beat Conagra Brands's return on equity of 5.56%.

Lamb Weston Holdings has a consensus price target of $69.79, signalling upside risk potential of 6.91%. On the other hand Conagra Brands has an analysts' consensus of $29.59 which suggests that it could grow by 7.41%. Given that Conagra Brands has higher upside potential than Lamb Weston Holdings, analysts believe Conagra Brands is more attractive than Lamb Weston Holdings.

Lamb Weston Holdings has a beta of 0.702, which suggesting that the stock is 29.79% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Conagra Brands has a beta of 0.311, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 68.91%.

Lamb Weston Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.36 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.21%. Conagra Brands offers a yield of 5.08% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share. Lamb Weston Holdings pays 23.98% of its earnings as a dividend. Conagra Brands pays out 189.89% of its earnings as a dividend. Lamb Weston Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Conagra Brands's is not.

Lamb Weston Holdings quarterly revenues are $1.6B, which are smaller than Conagra Brands quarterly revenues of $3.2B. Lamb Weston Holdings's net income of -$36.1M is lower than Conagra Brands's net income of $284.5M. Notably, Lamb Weston Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 25.80x while Conagra Brands's PE ratio is 27.01x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lamb Weston Holdings is 1.49x versus 1.11x for Conagra Brands. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

General Mills has a net margin of -2.26% compared to Lamb Weston Holdings's net margin of 15.19%. Lamb Weston Holdings's return on equity of 21.14% beat General Mills's return on equity of 27.15%.

Lamb Weston Holdings has a consensus price target of $69.79, signalling upside risk potential of 6.91%. On the other hand General Mills has an analysts' consensus of $71.06 which suggests that it could grow by 11.45%. Given that General Mills has higher upside potential than Lamb Weston Holdings, analysts believe General Mills is more attractive than Lamb Weston Holdings.

Lamb Weston Holdings has a beta of 0.702, which suggesting that the stock is 29.79% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison General Mills has a beta of 0.098, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 90.21%.

Lamb Weston Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.36 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.21%. General Mills offers a yield of 3.73% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.60 per share. Lamb Weston Holdings pays 23.98% of its earnings as a dividend. General Mills pays out 54.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lamb Weston Holdings quarterly revenues are $1.6B, which are smaller than General Mills quarterly revenues of $5.2B. Lamb Weston Holdings's net income of -$36.1M is lower than General Mills's net income of $795.7M. Notably, Lamb Weston Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 25.80x while General Mills's PE ratio is 13.86x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lamb Weston Holdings is 1.49x versus 1.82x for General Mills. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lancaster Colony has a net margin of -2.26% compared to Lamb Weston Holdings's net margin of 9.58%. Lamb Weston Holdings's return on equity of 21.14% beat Lancaster Colony's return on equity of 17.43%.

Lamb Weston Holdings has a consensus price target of $69.79, signalling upside risk potential of 6.91%. On the other hand Lancaster Colony has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 11.19%. Given that Lancaster Colony has higher upside potential than Lamb Weston Holdings, analysts believe Lancaster Colony is more attractive than Lamb Weston Holdings.

Lamb Weston Holdings has a beta of 0.702, which suggesting that the stock is 29.79% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lancaster Colony has a beta of 0.349, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 65.141%.

Lamb Weston Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.36 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.21%. Lancaster Colony offers a yield of 2.05% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.95 per share. Lamb Weston Holdings pays 23.98% of its earnings as a dividend. Lancaster Colony pays out 61.74% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lamb Weston Holdings quarterly revenues are $1.6B, which are larger than Lancaster Colony quarterly revenues of $466.6M. Lamb Weston Holdings's net income of -$36.1M is lower than Lancaster Colony's net income of $44.7M. Notably, Lamb Weston Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 25.80x while Lancaster Colony's PE ratio is 30.75x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lamb Weston Holdings is 1.49x versus 2.60x for Lancaster Colony. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

McCormick & has a net margin of -2.26% compared to Lamb Weston Holdings's net margin of 11.21%. Lamb Weston Holdings's return on equity of 21.14% beat McCormick &'s return on equity of 14.38%.

Lamb Weston Holdings has a consensus price target of $69.79, signalling upside risk potential of 6.91%. On the other hand McCormick & has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 9.09%. Given that McCormick & has higher upside potential than Lamb Weston Holdings, analysts believe McCormick & is more attractive than Lamb Weston Holdings.

Lamb Weston Holdings has a beta of 0.702, which suggesting that the stock is 29.79% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison McCormick & has a beta of 0.755, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 24.516%.

Lamb Weston Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.36 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.21%. McCormick & offers a yield of 2.16% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.42 per share. Lamb Weston Holdings pays 23.98% of its earnings as a dividend. McCormick & pays out 61.49% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lamb Weston Holdings quarterly revenues are $1.6B, which are smaller than McCormick & quarterly revenues of $1.6B. Lamb Weston Holdings's net income of -$36.1M is lower than McCormick &'s net income of $184.2M. Notably, Lamb Weston Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 25.80x while McCormick &'s PE ratio is 26.47x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lamb Weston Holdings is 1.49x versus 3.14x for McCormick &. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.