NTAP Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

NVIDIA has a net margin of 18.03% compared to NetApp's net margin of 55.04%. NetApp's return on equity of 121.65% beat NVIDIA's return on equity of 126.43%.

NetApp has a consensus price target of $138.88, signalling upside risk potential of 17.22%. On the other hand NVIDIA has an analysts' consensus of $172.80 which suggests that it could grow by 28.29%. Given that NVIDIA has higher upside potential than NetApp, analysts believe NVIDIA is more attractive than NetApp.

NetApp has a beta of 1.230, which suggesting that the stock is 23.045% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NVIDIA has a beta of 1.635, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 63.477%.

NetApp has a quarterly dividend of $0.52 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.72%. NVIDIA offers a yield of 0.03% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. NetApp pays 42.19% of its earnings as a dividend. NVIDIA pays out 1.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

NetApp quarterly revenues are $1.7B, which are smaller than NVIDIA quarterly revenues of $35.1B. NetApp's net income of $299M is lower than NVIDIA's net income of $19.3B. Notably, NetApp's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.78x while NVIDIA's PE ratio is 53.01x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for NetApp is 3.87x versus 29.57x for NVIDIA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Pure Storage has a net margin of 18.03% compared to NetApp's net margin of 7.66%. NetApp's return on equity of 121.65% beat Pure Storage's return on equity of 9.75%.

NetApp has a consensus price target of $138.88, signalling upside risk potential of 17.22%. On the other hand Pure Storage has an analysts' consensus of $71.78 which suggests that it could grow by 11.47%. Given that NetApp has higher upside potential than Pure Storage, analysts believe NetApp is more attractive than Pure Storage.

NetApp has a beta of 1.230, which suggesting that the stock is 23.045% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Pure Storage has a beta of 1.129, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.853%.

NetApp has a quarterly dividend of $0.52 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.72%. Pure Storage offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. NetApp pays 42.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Pure Storage pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. NetApp's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

NetApp quarterly revenues are $1.7B, which are larger than Pure Storage quarterly revenues of $831.1M. NetApp's net income of $299M is higher than Pure Storage's net income of $63.6M. Notably, NetApp's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.78x while Pure Storage's PE ratio is 169.47x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for NetApp is 3.87x versus 7.36x for Pure Storage. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Quantum has a net margin of 18.03% compared to NetApp's net margin of -19.2%. NetApp's return on equity of 121.65% beat Quantum's return on equity of --.

NetApp has a consensus price target of $138.88, signalling upside risk potential of 17.22%. On the other hand Quantum has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -89.02%. Given that NetApp has higher upside potential than Quantum, analysts believe NetApp is more attractive than Quantum.

NetApp has a beta of 1.230, which suggesting that the stock is 23.045% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Quantum has a beta of 3.580, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 257.987%.

NetApp has a quarterly dividend of $0.52 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.72%. Quantum offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. NetApp pays 42.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Quantum pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. NetApp's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

NetApp quarterly revenues are $1.7B, which are larger than Quantum quarterly revenues of $70.5M. NetApp's net income of $299M is higher than Quantum's net income of -$13.5M. Notably, NetApp's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.78x while Quantum's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for NetApp is 3.87x versus 0.76x for Quantum. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Super Micro Computer has a net margin of 18.03% compared to NetApp's net margin of 6.65%. NetApp's return on equity of 121.65% beat Super Micro Computer's return on equity of 33.98%.

NetApp has a consensus price target of $138.88, signalling upside risk potential of 17.22%. On the other hand Super Micro Computer has an analysts' consensus of $41.93 which suggests that it could grow by 32.73%. Given that Super Micro Computer has higher upside potential than NetApp, analysts believe Super Micro Computer is more attractive than NetApp.

NetApp has a beta of 1.230, which suggesting that the stock is 23.045% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Super Micro Computer has a beta of 1.291, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.097%.

NetApp has a quarterly dividend of $0.52 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.72%. Super Micro Computer offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. NetApp pays 42.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Super Micro Computer pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. NetApp's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

NetApp quarterly revenues are $1.7B, which are smaller than Super Micro Computer quarterly revenues of $5.3B. NetApp's net income of $299M is lower than Super Micro Computer's net income of $352.7M. Notably, NetApp's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.78x while Super Micro Computer's PE ratio is 15.86x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for NetApp is 3.87x versus 1.27x for Super Micro Computer. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.