PSTG Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

IonQ has a net margin of 4.82% compared to Pure Storage's net margin of -1725%. Pure Storage's return on equity of 7.83% beat IonQ's return on equity of -73.78%.

Pure Storage has a consensus price target of $67.81, signalling upside risk potential of 64.38%. On the other hand IonQ has an analysts' consensus of $41.60 which suggests that it could grow by 64.1%. Given that Pure Storage has higher upside potential than IonQ, analysts believe Pure Storage is more attractive than IonQ.

Pure Storage has a beta of 1.076, which suggesting that the stock is 7.593% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison IonQ has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Pure Storage has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. IonQ offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Pure Storage pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. IonQ pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Pure Storage quarterly revenues are $879.8M, which are larger than IonQ quarterly revenues of $11.7M. Pure Storage's net income of $42.4M is higher than IonQ's net income of -$202M. Notably, Pure Storage's price-to-earnings ratio is 137.50x while IonQ's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Pure Storage is 4.40x versus 125.37x for IonQ. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NetApp has a net margin of 4.82% compared to Pure Storage's net margin of 18.22%. Pure Storage's return on equity of 7.83% beat NetApp's return on equity of 114.71%.

Pure Storage has a consensus price target of $67.81, signalling upside risk potential of 64.38%. On the other hand NetApp has an analysts' consensus of $117.40 which suggests that it could grow by 40.97%. Given that Pure Storage has higher upside potential than NetApp, analysts believe Pure Storage is more attractive than NetApp.

Pure Storage has a beta of 1.076, which suggesting that the stock is 7.593% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NetApp has a beta of 1.311, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 31.087%.

Pure Storage has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. NetApp offers a yield of 2.5% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.52 per share. Pure Storage pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. NetApp pays out 42.19% of its earnings as a dividend. NetApp's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Pure Storage quarterly revenues are $879.8M, which are smaller than NetApp quarterly revenues of $1.6B. Pure Storage's net income of $42.4M is lower than NetApp's net income of $299M. Notably, Pure Storage's price-to-earnings ratio is 137.50x while NetApp's PE ratio is 15.42x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Pure Storage is 4.40x versus 2.70x for NetApp. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NVIDIA has a net margin of 4.82% compared to Pure Storage's net margin of 56.17%. Pure Storage's return on equity of 7.83% beat NVIDIA's return on equity of 123.32%.

Pure Storage has a consensus price target of $67.81, signalling upside risk potential of 64.38%. On the other hand NVIDIA has an analysts' consensus of $167.69 which suggests that it could grow by 51.46%. Given that Pure Storage has higher upside potential than NVIDIA, analysts believe Pure Storage is more attractive than NVIDIA.

Pure Storage has a beta of 1.076, which suggesting that the stock is 7.593% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NVIDIA has a beta of 1.959, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 95.871%.

Pure Storage has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. NVIDIA offers a yield of 0.04% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Pure Storage pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. NVIDIA pays out 1.14% of its earnings as a dividend. NVIDIA's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Pure Storage quarterly revenues are $879.8M, which are smaller than NVIDIA quarterly revenues of $39.3B. Pure Storage's net income of $42.4M is lower than NVIDIA's net income of $22.1B. Notably, Pure Storage's price-to-earnings ratio is 137.50x while NVIDIA's PE ratio is 37.68x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Pure Storage is 4.40x versus 21.04x for NVIDIA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Western Digital has a net margin of 4.82% compared to Pure Storage's net margin of 13.86%. Pure Storage's return on equity of 7.83% beat Western Digital's return on equity of 11.02%.

Pure Storage has a consensus price target of $67.81, signalling upside risk potential of 64.38%. On the other hand Western Digital has an analysts' consensus of $67.62 which suggests that it could grow by 88.77%. Given that Western Digital has higher upside potential than Pure Storage, analysts believe Western Digital is more attractive than Pure Storage.

Pure Storage has a beta of 1.076, which suggesting that the stock is 7.593% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Western Digital has a beta of 1.450, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 44.958%.

Pure Storage has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Western Digital offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Pure Storage pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Western Digital pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Pure Storage quarterly revenues are $879.8M, which are smaller than Western Digital quarterly revenues of $4.3B. Pure Storage's net income of $42.4M is lower than Western Digital's net income of $594M. Notably, Pure Storage's price-to-earnings ratio is 137.50x while Western Digital's PE ratio is 8.53x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Pure Storage is 4.40x versus 0.79x for Western Digital. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.