NVDA Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Advanced Micro Devices has a net margin of 56.17% compared to NVIDIA's net margin of 6.29%. NVIDIA's return on equity of 123.32% beat Advanced Micro Devices's return on equity of 2.9%.

NVIDIA has a consensus price target of $171.01, signalling upside risk potential of 53.47%. On the other hand Advanced Micro Devices has an analysts' consensus of $146.53 which suggests that it could grow by 41.96%. Given that NVIDIA has higher upside potential than Advanced Micro Devices, analysts believe NVIDIA is more attractive than Advanced Micro Devices.

NVIDIA has a beta of 1.766, which suggesting that the stock is 76.633% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Advanced Micro Devices has a beta of 1.739, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 73.869%.

NVIDIA has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.04%. Advanced Micro Devices offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. NVIDIA pays 1.14% of its earnings as a dividend. Advanced Micro Devices pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. NVIDIA's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

NVIDIA quarterly revenues are $39.3B, which are larger than Advanced Micro Devices quarterly revenues of $7.7B. NVIDIA's net income of $22.1B is higher than Advanced Micro Devices's net income of $482M. Notably, NVIDIA's price-to-earnings ratio is 37.93x while Advanced Micro Devices's PE ratio is 104.26x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for NVIDIA is 21.18x versus 6.55x for Advanced Micro Devices. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Intel has a net margin of 56.17% compared to NVIDIA's net margin of -0.88%. NVIDIA's return on equity of 123.32% beat Intel's return on equity of -17.02%.

NVIDIA has a consensus price target of $171.01, signalling upside risk potential of 53.47%. On the other hand Intel has an analysts' consensus of $22.90 which suggests that it could fall by -3.06%. Given that NVIDIA has higher upside potential than Intel, analysts believe NVIDIA is more attractive than Intel.

NVIDIA has a beta of 1.766, which suggesting that the stock is 76.633% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Intel has a beta of 1.027, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.678%.

NVIDIA has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.04%. Intel offers a yield of 2.12% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. NVIDIA pays 1.14% of its earnings as a dividend. Intel pays out -8.53% of its earnings as a dividend. NVIDIA's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

NVIDIA quarterly revenues are $39.3B, which are larger than Intel quarterly revenues of $14.3B. NVIDIA's net income of $22.1B is higher than Intel's net income of -$126M. Notably, NVIDIA's price-to-earnings ratio is 37.93x while Intel's PE ratio is 95.83x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for NVIDIA is 21.18x versus 1.90x for Intel. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

KLA has a net margin of 56.17% compared to NVIDIA's net margin of 26.8%. NVIDIA's return on equity of 123.32% beat KLA's return on equity of 96.34%.

NVIDIA has a consensus price target of $171.01, signalling upside risk potential of 53.47%. On the other hand KLA has an analysts' consensus of $819.68 which suggests that it could grow by 17.1%. Given that NVIDIA has higher upside potential than KLA, analysts believe NVIDIA is more attractive than KLA.

NVIDIA has a beta of 1.766, which suggesting that the stock is 76.633% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison KLA has a beta of 1.298, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.786%.

NVIDIA has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.04%. KLA offers a yield of 0.9% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.70 per share. NVIDIA pays 1.14% of its earnings as a dividend. KLA pays out 27.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

NVIDIA quarterly revenues are $39.3B, which are larger than KLA quarterly revenues of $3.1B. NVIDIA's net income of $22.1B is higher than KLA's net income of $824.5M. Notably, NVIDIA's price-to-earnings ratio is 37.93x while KLA's PE ratio is 29.44x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for NVIDIA is 21.18x versus 8.71x for KLA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Monolithic Power Systems has a net margin of 56.17% compared to NVIDIA's net margin of 23.29%. NVIDIA's return on equity of 123.32% beat Monolithic Power Systems's return on equity of 75.35%.

NVIDIA has a consensus price target of $171.01, signalling upside risk potential of 53.47%. On the other hand Monolithic Power Systems has an analysts' consensus of $817.74 which suggests that it could grow by 35.96%. Given that NVIDIA has higher upside potential than Monolithic Power Systems, analysts believe NVIDIA is more attractive than Monolithic Power Systems.

NVIDIA has a beta of 1.766, which suggesting that the stock is 76.633% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Monolithic Power Systems has a beta of 1.034, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.379%.

NVIDIA has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.04%. Monolithic Power Systems offers a yield of 0.83% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.25 per share. NVIDIA pays 1.14% of its earnings as a dividend. Monolithic Power Systems pays out 13.47% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

NVIDIA quarterly revenues are $39.3B, which are larger than Monolithic Power Systems quarterly revenues of $621.7M. NVIDIA's net income of $22.1B is higher than Monolithic Power Systems's net income of $1.4B. Notably, NVIDIA's price-to-earnings ratio is 37.93x while Monolithic Power Systems's PE ratio is 16.36x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for NVIDIA is 21.18x versus 13.31x for Monolithic Power Systems. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.