KLAC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Advanced Micro Devices has a net margin of 33.29% compared to KLA's net margin of 11.31%. KLA's return on equity of 92.37% beat Advanced Micro Devices's return on equity of 3.25%.

KLA has a consensus price target of $789.80, signalling upside risk potential of 21.89%. On the other hand Advanced Micro Devices has an analysts' consensus of $183.16 which suggests that it could grow by 47%. Given that Advanced Micro Devices has higher upside potential than KLA, analysts believe Advanced Micro Devices is more attractive than KLA.

KLA has a beta of 1.275, which suggesting that the stock is 27.48% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Advanced Micro Devices has a beta of 1.653, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 65.343%.

KLA has a quarterly dividend of $1.70 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.93%. Advanced Micro Devices offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. KLA pays 27.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Advanced Micro Devices pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. KLA's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

KLA quarterly revenues are $2.8B, which are smaller than Advanced Micro Devices quarterly revenues of $6.8B. KLA's net income of $945.9M is higher than Advanced Micro Devices's net income of $771M. Notably, KLA's price-to-earnings ratio is 29.59x while Advanced Micro Devices's PE ratio is 112.25x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for KLA is 8.57x versus 8.38x for Advanced Micro Devices. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lam Research has a net margin of 33.29% compared to KLA's net margin of 26.79%. KLA's return on equity of 92.37% beat Lam Research's return on equity of 49.11%.

KLA has a consensus price target of $789.80, signalling upside risk potential of 21.89%. On the other hand Lam Research has an analysts' consensus of $92.82 which suggests that it could grow by 25.77%. Given that Lam Research has higher upside potential than KLA, analysts believe Lam Research is more attractive than KLA.

KLA has a beta of 1.275, which suggesting that the stock is 27.48% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lam Research has a beta of 1.463, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 46.279%.

KLA has a quarterly dividend of $1.70 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.93%. Lam Research offers a yield of 1.17% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share. KLA pays 27.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Lam Research pays out 26.62% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

KLA quarterly revenues are $2.8B, which are smaller than Lam Research quarterly revenues of $4.2B. KLA's net income of $945.9M is lower than Lam Research's net income of $1.1B. Notably, KLA's price-to-earnings ratio is 29.59x while Lam Research's PE ratio is 23.85x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for KLA is 8.57x versus 6.22x for Lam Research. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Micron Technology has a net margin of 33.29% compared to KLA's net margin of 21.47%. KLA's return on equity of 92.37% beat Micron Technology's return on equity of 8.71%.

KLA has a consensus price target of $789.80, signalling upside risk potential of 21.89%. On the other hand Micron Technology has an analysts' consensus of $132.01 which suggests that it could grow by 47.13%. Given that Micron Technology has higher upside potential than KLA, analysts believe Micron Technology is more attractive than KLA.

KLA has a beta of 1.275, which suggesting that the stock is 27.48% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Micron Technology has a beta of 1.160, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 16.005%.

KLA has a quarterly dividend of $1.70 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.93%. Micron Technology offers a yield of 0.51% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share. KLA pays 27.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Micron Technology pays out 65.94% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

KLA quarterly revenues are $2.8B, which are smaller than Micron Technology quarterly revenues of $8.7B. KLA's net income of $945.9M is lower than Micron Technology's net income of $1.9B. Notably, KLA's price-to-earnings ratio is 29.59x while Micron Technology's PE ratio is 25.86x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for KLA is 8.57x versus 3.48x for Micron Technology. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NVIDIA has a net margin of 33.29% compared to KLA's net margin of 55.04%. KLA's return on equity of 92.37% beat NVIDIA's return on equity of 126.43%.

KLA has a consensus price target of $789.80, signalling upside risk potential of 21.89%. On the other hand NVIDIA has an analysts' consensus of $172.80 which suggests that it could grow by 23.72%. Given that NVIDIA has higher upside potential than KLA, analysts believe NVIDIA is more attractive than KLA.

KLA has a beta of 1.275, which suggesting that the stock is 27.48% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NVIDIA has a beta of 1.635, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 63.477%.

KLA has a quarterly dividend of $1.70 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.93%. NVIDIA offers a yield of 0.02% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. KLA pays 27.99% of its earnings as a dividend. NVIDIA pays out 1.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

KLA quarterly revenues are $2.8B, which are smaller than NVIDIA quarterly revenues of $35.1B. KLA's net income of $945.9M is lower than NVIDIA's net income of $19.3B. Notably, KLA's price-to-earnings ratio is 29.59x while NVIDIA's PE ratio is 54.97x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for KLA is 8.57x versus 30.66x for NVIDIA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.