AMAT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Intel has a net margin of 16.54% compared to Applied Materials's net margin of -0.88%. Applied Materials's return on equity of 34.44% beat Intel's return on equity of -17.02%.

Applied Materials has a consensus price target of $206.3200, signalling upside risk potential of 39.64%. On the other hand Intel has an analysts' consensus of $22.90 which suggests that it could grow by 4.18%. Given that Applied Materials has higher upside potential than Intel, analysts believe Applied Materials is more attractive than Intel.

Applied Materials has a beta of 1.609, which suggesting that the stock is 60.887% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Intel has a beta of 1.129, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.94%.

Applied Materials has a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.08%. Intel offers a yield of 2.28% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. Applied Materials pays 16.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Intel pays out -8.53% of its earnings as a dividend. Applied Materials's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Applied Materials quarterly revenues are $7.2B, which are smaller than Intel quarterly revenues of $14.3B. Applied Materials's net income of $1.2B is higher than Intel's net income of -$126M. Notably, Applied Materials's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.31x while Intel's PE ratio is 95.83x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Applied Materials is 4.44x versus 1.77x for Intel. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

KLA has a net margin of 16.54% compared to Applied Materials's net margin of 26.8%. Applied Materials's return on equity of 34.44% beat KLA's return on equity of 96.34%.

Applied Materials has a consensus price target of $206.3200, signalling upside risk potential of 39.64%. On the other hand KLA has an analysts' consensus of $820.53 which suggests that it could grow by 19.58%. Given that Applied Materials has higher upside potential than KLA, analysts believe Applied Materials is more attractive than KLA.

Applied Materials has a beta of 1.609, which suggesting that the stock is 60.887% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison KLA has a beta of 1.370, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 36.998%.

Applied Materials has a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.08%. KLA offers a yield of 0.92% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.70 per share. Applied Materials pays 16.61% of its earnings as a dividend. KLA pays out 27.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Applied Materials quarterly revenues are $7.2B, which are larger than KLA quarterly revenues of $3.1B. Applied Materials's net income of $1.2B is higher than KLA's net income of $824.5M. Notably, Applied Materials's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.31x while KLA's PE ratio is 28.86x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Applied Materials is 4.44x versus 8.54x for KLA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Micron Technology has a net margin of 16.54% compared to Applied Materials's net margin of 19.66%. Applied Materials's return on equity of 34.44% beat Micron Technology's return on equity of 10.22%.

Applied Materials has a consensus price target of $206.3200, signalling upside risk potential of 39.64%. On the other hand Micron Technology has an analysts' consensus of $129.08 which suggests that it could grow by 45.68%. Given that Micron Technology has higher upside potential than Applied Materials, analysts believe Micron Technology is more attractive than Applied Materials.

Applied Materials has a beta of 1.609, which suggesting that the stock is 60.887% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Micron Technology has a beta of 1.180, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 18.023%.

Applied Materials has a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.08%. Micron Technology offers a yield of 0.52% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share. Applied Materials pays 16.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Micron Technology pays out 65.94% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Applied Materials quarterly revenues are $7.2B, which are smaller than Micron Technology quarterly revenues of $8.1B. Applied Materials's net income of $1.2B is lower than Micron Technology's net income of $1.6B. Notably, Applied Materials's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.31x while Micron Technology's PE ratio is 21.25x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Applied Materials is 4.44x versus 3.20x for Micron Technology. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NVIDIA has a net margin of 16.54% compared to Applied Materials's net margin of 56.17%. Applied Materials's return on equity of 34.44% beat NVIDIA's return on equity of 123.32%.

Applied Materials has a consensus price target of $206.3200, signalling upside risk potential of 39.64%. On the other hand NVIDIA has an analysts' consensus of $171.01 which suggests that it could grow by 54.88%. Given that NVIDIA has higher upside potential than Applied Materials, analysts believe NVIDIA is more attractive than Applied Materials.

Applied Materials has a beta of 1.609, which suggesting that the stock is 60.887% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NVIDIA has a beta of 1.959, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 95.871%.

Applied Materials has a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.08%. NVIDIA offers a yield of 0.04% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Applied Materials pays 16.61% of its earnings as a dividend. NVIDIA pays out 1.14% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Applied Materials quarterly revenues are $7.2B, which are smaller than NVIDIA quarterly revenues of $39.3B. Applied Materials's net income of $1.2B is lower than NVIDIA's net income of $22.1B. Notably, Applied Materials's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.31x while NVIDIA's PE ratio is 37.58x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Applied Materials is 4.44x versus 20.99x for NVIDIA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.