HPQ Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Dell Technologies has a net margin of 4.18% compared to HP's net margin of 6.91%. HP's return on equity of -- beat Dell Technologies's return on equity of --.

HP has a consensus price target of $34.39, signalling upside risk potential of 46.71%. On the other hand Dell Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $130.63 which suggests that it could grow by 59.44%. Given that Dell Technologies has higher upside potential than HP, analysts believe Dell Technologies is more attractive than HP.

HP has a beta of 1.092, which suggesting that the stock is 9.205% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Dell Technologies has a beta of 0.939, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.074%.

HP has a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.82%. Dell Technologies offers a yield of 2.17% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share. HP pays 38.74% of its earnings as a dividend. Dell Technologies pays out 27.77% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

HP quarterly revenues are $13.5B, which are smaller than Dell Technologies quarterly revenues of $23.9B. HP's net income of $565M is lower than Dell Technologies's net income of $1.7B. Notably, HP's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.43x while Dell Technologies's PE ratio is 13.17x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for HP is 0.43x versus 0.62x for Dell Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Intel has a net margin of 4.18% compared to HP's net margin of -0.88%. HP's return on equity of -- beat Intel's return on equity of -17.02%.

HP has a consensus price target of $34.39, signalling upside risk potential of 46.71%. On the other hand Intel has an analysts' consensus of $22.90 which suggests that it could grow by 15.99%. Given that HP has higher upside potential than Intel, analysts believe HP is more attractive than Intel.

HP has a beta of 1.092, which suggesting that the stock is 9.205% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Intel has a beta of 1.129, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.94%.

HP has a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.82%. Intel offers a yield of 2.53% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. HP pays 38.74% of its earnings as a dividend. Intel pays out -8.53% of its earnings as a dividend. HP's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

HP quarterly revenues are $13.5B, which are smaller than Intel quarterly revenues of $14.3B. HP's net income of $565M is higher than Intel's net income of -$126M. Notably, HP's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.43x while Intel's PE ratio is 95.83x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for HP is 0.43x versus 1.59x for Intel. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NVIDIA has a net margin of 4.18% compared to HP's net margin of 56.17%. HP's return on equity of -- beat NVIDIA's return on equity of 123.32%.

HP has a consensus price target of $34.39, signalling upside risk potential of 46.71%. On the other hand NVIDIA has an analysts' consensus of $168.01 which suggests that it could grow by 56.19%. Given that NVIDIA has higher upside potential than HP, analysts believe NVIDIA is more attractive than HP.

HP has a beta of 1.092, which suggesting that the stock is 9.205% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NVIDIA has a beta of 1.959, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 95.871%.

HP has a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.82%. NVIDIA offers a yield of 0.04% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. HP pays 38.74% of its earnings as a dividend. NVIDIA pays out 1.14% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

HP quarterly revenues are $13.5B, which are smaller than NVIDIA quarterly revenues of $39.3B. HP's net income of $565M is lower than NVIDIA's net income of $22.1B. Notably, HP's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.43x while NVIDIA's PE ratio is 36.61x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for HP is 0.43x versus 20.45x for NVIDIA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Super Micro Computer has a net margin of 4.18% compared to HP's net margin of 5.65%. HP's return on equity of -- beat Super Micro Computer's return on equity of 28.1%.

HP has a consensus price target of $34.39, signalling upside risk potential of 46.71%. On the other hand Super Micro Computer has an analysts' consensus of $52.19 which suggests that it could grow by 54.97%. Given that Super Micro Computer has higher upside potential than HP, analysts believe Super Micro Computer is more attractive than HP.

HP has a beta of 1.092, which suggesting that the stock is 9.205% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Super Micro Computer has a beta of 1.224, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 22.435%.

HP has a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.82%. Super Micro Computer offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. HP pays 38.74% of its earnings as a dividend. Super Micro Computer pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. HP's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

HP quarterly revenues are $13.5B, which are larger than Super Micro Computer quarterly revenues of $5.7B. HP's net income of $565M is higher than Super Micro Computer's net income of $320.6M. Notably, HP's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.43x while Super Micro Computer's PE ratio is 14.11x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for HP is 0.43x versus 1.02x for Super Micro Computer. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.