SSDOY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Kao has a net margin of 0.35% compared to Shiseido's net margin of 6.87%. Shiseido's return on equity of 0.28% beat Kao's return on equity of 7.86%.

Shiseido has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Kao has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Shiseido has higher upside potential than Kao, analysts believe Shiseido is more attractive than Kao.

Shiseido has a beta of 0.318, which suggesting that the stock is 68.242% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kao has a beta of 0.199, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 80.095%.

Shiseido has a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.72%. Kao offers a yield of 2.47% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. Shiseido pays -221.76% of its earnings as a dividend. Kao pays out 65.18% of its earnings as a dividend. Kao's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Shiseido quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are smaller than Kao quarterly revenues of $2.7B. Shiseido's net income of $5M is lower than Kao's net income of $185.9M. Notably, Shiseido's price-to-earnings ratio is 523.84x while Kao's PE ratio is 35.08x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Shiseido is 0.96x versus 1.82x for Kao. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Seven & i Holdings has a net margin of 0.35% compared to Shiseido's net margin of 0.38%. Shiseido's return on equity of 0.28% beat Seven & i Holdings's return on equity of 2.66%.

Shiseido has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Seven & i Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Shiseido has higher upside potential than Seven & i Holdings, analysts believe Shiseido is more attractive than Seven & i Holdings.

Shiseido has a beta of 0.318, which suggesting that the stock is 68.242% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Seven & i Holdings has a beta of 0.416, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 58.434%.

Shiseido has a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.72%. Seven & i Holdings offers a yield of 1.84% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. Shiseido pays -221.76% of its earnings as a dividend. Seven & i Holdings pays out 58.59% of its earnings as a dividend. Seven & i Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Shiseido quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are smaller than Seven & i Holdings quarterly revenues of $20.4B. Shiseido's net income of $5M is lower than Seven & i Holdings's net income of $76.6M. Notably, Shiseido's price-to-earnings ratio is 523.84x while Seven & i Holdings's PE ratio is 48.03x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Shiseido is 0.96x versus 0.45x for Seven & i Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Toyo Suisan Kaisha has a net margin of 0.35% compared to Shiseido's net margin of 13.65%. Shiseido's return on equity of 0.28% beat Toyo Suisan Kaisha's return on equity of 13.98%.

Shiseido has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Toyo Suisan Kaisha has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Shiseido has higher upside potential than Toyo Suisan Kaisha, analysts believe Shiseido is more attractive than Toyo Suisan Kaisha.

Shiseido has a beta of 0.318, which suggesting that the stock is 68.242% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Toyo Suisan Kaisha has a beta of 0.476, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 52.373%.

Shiseido has a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.72%. Toyo Suisan Kaisha offers a yield of 1.98% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.53 per share. Shiseido pays -221.76% of its earnings as a dividend. Toyo Suisan Kaisha pays out 22.01% of its earnings as a dividend. Toyo Suisan Kaisha's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Shiseido quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are larger than Toyo Suisan Kaisha quarterly revenues of $980.3M. Shiseido's net income of $5M is lower than Toyo Suisan Kaisha's net income of $133.8M. Notably, Shiseido's price-to-earnings ratio is 523.84x while Toyo Suisan Kaisha's PE ratio is 14.42x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Shiseido is 0.96x versus 1.78x for Toyo Suisan Kaisha. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Unicharm has a net margin of 0.35% compared to Shiseido's net margin of 8.5%. Shiseido's return on equity of 0.28% beat Unicharm's return on equity of 10.38%.

Shiseido has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Unicharm has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Shiseido has higher upside potential than Unicharm, analysts believe Shiseido is more attractive than Unicharm.

Shiseido has a beta of 0.318, which suggesting that the stock is 68.242% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Unicharm has a beta of 0.298, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 70.203%.

Shiseido has a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.72%. Unicharm offers a yield of 1.23% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share. Shiseido pays -221.76% of its earnings as a dividend. Unicharm pays out 30.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Unicharm's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Shiseido quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are smaller than Unicharm quarterly revenues of $1.6B. Shiseido's net income of $5M is lower than Unicharm's net income of $134.1M. Notably, Shiseido's price-to-earnings ratio is 523.84x while Unicharm's PE ratio is 25.76x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Shiseido is 0.96x versus 2.39x for Unicharm. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.