KAOOY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Shiseido has a net margin of 6.87% compared to Kao's net margin of 0.35%. Kao's return on equity of 7.86% beat Shiseido's return on equity of 0.28%.

Kao has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Shiseido has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Kao has higher upside potential than Shiseido, analysts believe Kao is more attractive than Shiseido.

Kao has a beta of 0.199, which suggesting that the stock is 80.095% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Shiseido has a beta of 0.318, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 68.242%.

Kao has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.47%. Shiseido offers a yield of 1.72% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share. Kao pays 65.18% of its earnings as a dividend. Shiseido pays out -221.76% of its earnings as a dividend. Kao's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Kao quarterly revenues are $2.7B, which are larger than Shiseido quarterly revenues of $1.4B. Kao's net income of $185.9M is higher than Shiseido's net income of $5M. Notably, Kao's price-to-earnings ratio is 35.08x while Shiseido's PE ratio is 523.84x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kao is 1.82x versus 0.96x for Shiseido. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Seven & i Holdings has a net margin of 6.87% compared to Kao's net margin of 0.38%. Kao's return on equity of 7.86% beat Seven & i Holdings's return on equity of 2.66%.

Kao has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Seven & i Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Kao has higher upside potential than Seven & i Holdings, analysts believe Kao is more attractive than Seven & i Holdings.

Kao has a beta of 0.199, which suggesting that the stock is 80.095% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Seven & i Holdings has a beta of 0.416, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 58.434%.

Kao has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.47%. Seven & i Holdings offers a yield of 1.84% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. Kao pays 65.18% of its earnings as a dividend. Seven & i Holdings pays out 58.59% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Kao quarterly revenues are $2.7B, which are smaller than Seven & i Holdings quarterly revenues of $20.4B. Kao's net income of $185.9M is higher than Seven & i Holdings's net income of $76.6M. Notably, Kao's price-to-earnings ratio is 35.08x while Seven & i Holdings's PE ratio is 48.03x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kao is 1.82x versus 0.45x for Seven & i Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Toyo Suisan Kaisha has a net margin of 6.87% compared to Kao's net margin of 13.65%. Kao's return on equity of 7.86% beat Toyo Suisan Kaisha's return on equity of 13.98%.

Kao has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Toyo Suisan Kaisha has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Kao has higher upside potential than Toyo Suisan Kaisha, analysts believe Kao is more attractive than Toyo Suisan Kaisha.

Kao has a beta of 0.199, which suggesting that the stock is 80.095% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Toyo Suisan Kaisha has a beta of 0.476, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 52.373%.

Kao has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.47%. Toyo Suisan Kaisha offers a yield of 1.98% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.53 per share. Kao pays 65.18% of its earnings as a dividend. Toyo Suisan Kaisha pays out 22.01% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Kao quarterly revenues are $2.7B, which are larger than Toyo Suisan Kaisha quarterly revenues of $980.3M. Kao's net income of $185.9M is higher than Toyo Suisan Kaisha's net income of $133.8M. Notably, Kao's price-to-earnings ratio is 35.08x while Toyo Suisan Kaisha's PE ratio is 14.42x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kao is 1.82x versus 1.78x for Toyo Suisan Kaisha. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Unicharm has a net margin of 6.87% compared to Kao's net margin of 8.5%. Kao's return on equity of 7.86% beat Unicharm's return on equity of 10.38%.

Kao has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Unicharm has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Kao has higher upside potential than Unicharm, analysts believe Kao is more attractive than Unicharm.

Kao has a beta of 0.199, which suggesting that the stock is 80.095% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Unicharm has a beta of 0.298, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 70.203%.

Kao has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.47%. Unicharm offers a yield of 1.23% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share. Kao pays 65.18% of its earnings as a dividend. Unicharm pays out 30.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Kao quarterly revenues are $2.7B, which are larger than Unicharm quarterly revenues of $1.6B. Kao's net income of $185.9M is higher than Unicharm's net income of $134.1M. Notably, Kao's price-to-earnings ratio is 35.08x while Unicharm's PE ratio is 25.76x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kao is 1.82x versus 2.39x for Unicharm. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.