DQJCY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Shiseido has a net margin of 3.72% compared to Pan Pacific International Holdings's net margin of 0.35%. Pan Pacific International Holdings's return on equity of 15.96% beat Shiseido's return on equity of 0.28%.

Pan Pacific International Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Shiseido has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Pan Pacific International Holdings has higher upside potential than Shiseido, analysts believe Pan Pacific International Holdings is more attractive than Shiseido.

Pan Pacific International Holdings has a beta of 0.092, which suggesting that the stock is 90.76% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Shiseido has a beta of 0.318, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 68.242%.

Pan Pacific International Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.76%. Shiseido offers a yield of 1.72% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share. Pan Pacific International Holdings pays 14.13% of its earnings as a dividend. Shiseido pays out -221.76% of its earnings as a dividend. Pan Pacific International Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Pan Pacific International Holdings quarterly revenues are $3.7B, which are larger than Shiseido quarterly revenues of $1.4B. Pan Pacific International Holdings's net income of $137.8M is higher than Shiseido's net income of $5M. Notably, Pan Pacific International Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 29.39x while Shiseido's PE ratio is 523.84x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Pan Pacific International Holdings is 1.30x versus 0.96x for Shiseido. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Seven & i Holdings has a net margin of 3.72% compared to Pan Pacific International Holdings's net margin of 0.38%. Pan Pacific International Holdings's return on equity of 15.96% beat Seven & i Holdings's return on equity of 2.66%.

Pan Pacific International Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Seven & i Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Pan Pacific International Holdings has higher upside potential than Seven & i Holdings, analysts believe Pan Pacific International Holdings is more attractive than Seven & i Holdings.

Pan Pacific International Holdings has a beta of 0.092, which suggesting that the stock is 90.76% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Seven & i Holdings has a beta of 0.416, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 58.434%.

Pan Pacific International Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.76%. Seven & i Holdings offers a yield of 1.84% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. Pan Pacific International Holdings pays 14.13% of its earnings as a dividend. Seven & i Holdings pays out 58.59% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Pan Pacific International Holdings quarterly revenues are $3.7B, which are smaller than Seven & i Holdings quarterly revenues of $20.4B. Pan Pacific International Holdings's net income of $137.8M is higher than Seven & i Holdings's net income of $76.6M. Notably, Pan Pacific International Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 29.39x while Seven & i Holdings's PE ratio is 48.03x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Pan Pacific International Holdings is 1.30x versus 0.45x for Seven & i Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Toyo Suisan Kaisha has a net margin of 3.72% compared to Pan Pacific International Holdings's net margin of 13.65%. Pan Pacific International Holdings's return on equity of 15.96% beat Toyo Suisan Kaisha's return on equity of 13.98%.

Pan Pacific International Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Toyo Suisan Kaisha has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Pan Pacific International Holdings has higher upside potential than Toyo Suisan Kaisha, analysts believe Pan Pacific International Holdings is more attractive than Toyo Suisan Kaisha.

Pan Pacific International Holdings has a beta of 0.092, which suggesting that the stock is 90.76% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Toyo Suisan Kaisha has a beta of 0.476, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 52.373%.

Pan Pacific International Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.76%. Toyo Suisan Kaisha offers a yield of 1.98% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.53 per share. Pan Pacific International Holdings pays 14.13% of its earnings as a dividend. Toyo Suisan Kaisha pays out 22.01% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Pan Pacific International Holdings quarterly revenues are $3.7B, which are larger than Toyo Suisan Kaisha quarterly revenues of $980.3M. Pan Pacific International Holdings's net income of $137.8M is higher than Toyo Suisan Kaisha's net income of $133.8M. Notably, Pan Pacific International Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 29.39x while Toyo Suisan Kaisha's PE ratio is 14.42x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Pan Pacific International Holdings is 1.30x versus 1.78x for Toyo Suisan Kaisha. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Unicharm has a net margin of 3.72% compared to Pan Pacific International Holdings's net margin of 8.5%. Pan Pacific International Holdings's return on equity of 15.96% beat Unicharm's return on equity of 10.38%.

Pan Pacific International Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Unicharm has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Pan Pacific International Holdings has higher upside potential than Unicharm, analysts believe Pan Pacific International Holdings is more attractive than Unicharm.

Pan Pacific International Holdings has a beta of 0.092, which suggesting that the stock is 90.76% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Unicharm has a beta of 0.298, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 70.203%.

Pan Pacific International Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.76%. Unicharm offers a yield of 1.23% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share. Pan Pacific International Holdings pays 14.13% of its earnings as a dividend. Unicharm pays out 30.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Pan Pacific International Holdings quarterly revenues are $3.7B, which are larger than Unicharm quarterly revenues of $1.6B. Pan Pacific International Holdings's net income of $137.8M is higher than Unicharm's net income of $134.1M. Notably, Pan Pacific International Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 29.39x while Unicharm's PE ratio is 25.76x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Pan Pacific International Holdings is 1.30x versus 2.39x for Unicharm. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.