UBER Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Salesforce has a net margin of 23.35% compared to Uber Technologies's net margin of 16.17%. Uber Technologies's return on equity of 33.34% beat Salesforce's return on equity of 10.11%.

Uber Technologies has a consensus price target of $90.05, signalling upside risk potential of 48.29%. On the other hand Salesforce has an analysts' consensus of $394.98 which suggests that it could grow by 14.94%. Given that Uber Technologies has higher upside potential than Salesforce, analysts believe Uber Technologies is more attractive than Salesforce.

Uber Technologies has a beta of 1.330, which suggesting that the stock is 33.034% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Salesforce has a beta of 1.304, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 30.388%.

Uber Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Salesforce offers a yield of 0.47% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. Uber Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Salesforce pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Uber Technologies quarterly revenues are $11.2B, which are larger than Salesforce quarterly revenues of $9.4B. Uber Technologies's net income of $2.6B is higher than Salesforce's net income of $1.5B. Notably, Uber Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is 30.21x while Salesforce's PE ratio is 56.52x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Uber Technologies is 3.08x versus 9.02x for Salesforce. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Microsoft has a net margin of 23.35% compared to Uber Technologies's net margin of 37.61%. Uber Technologies's return on equity of 33.34% beat Microsoft's return on equity of 35.68%.

Uber Technologies has a consensus price target of $90.05, signalling upside risk potential of 48.29%. On the other hand Microsoft has an analysts' consensus of $507.50 which suggests that it could grow by 16.24%. Given that Uber Technologies has higher upside potential than Microsoft, analysts believe Uber Technologies is more attractive than Microsoft.

Uber Technologies has a beta of 1.330, which suggesting that the stock is 33.034% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Microsoft has a beta of 0.899, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.139%.

Uber Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Microsoft offers a yield of 0.71% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share. Uber Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Microsoft pays out 24.7% of its earnings as a dividend. Microsoft's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Uber Technologies quarterly revenues are $11.2B, which are smaller than Microsoft quarterly revenues of $65.6B. Uber Technologies's net income of $2.6B is lower than Microsoft's net income of $24.7B. Notably, Uber Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is 30.21x while Microsoft's PE ratio is 36.02x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Uber Technologies is 3.08x versus 12.83x for Microsoft. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Oracle has a net margin of 23.35% compared to Uber Technologies's net margin of 22.41%. Uber Technologies's return on equity of 33.34% beat Oracle's return on equity of 128.3%.

Uber Technologies has a consensus price target of $90.05, signalling upside risk potential of 48.29%. On the other hand Oracle has an analysts' consensus of $196.55 which suggests that it could grow by 15.85%. Given that Uber Technologies has higher upside potential than Oracle, analysts believe Uber Technologies is more attractive than Oracle.

Uber Technologies has a beta of 1.330, which suggesting that the stock is 33.034% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Oracle has a beta of 1.029, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.915%.

Uber Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Oracle offers a yield of 0.94% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. Uber Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Oracle pays out 41.95% of its earnings as a dividend. Oracle's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Uber Technologies quarterly revenues are $11.2B, which are smaller than Oracle quarterly revenues of $14.1B. Uber Technologies's net income of $2.6B is lower than Oracle's net income of $3.2B. Notably, Uber Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is 30.21x while Oracle's PE ratio is 41.48x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Uber Technologies is 3.08x versus 8.78x for Oracle. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Synopsys has a net margin of 23.35% compared to Uber Technologies's net margin of 68.1%. Uber Technologies's return on equity of 33.34% beat Synopsys's return on equity of 30.71%.

Uber Technologies has a consensus price target of $90.05, signalling upside risk potential of 48.29%. On the other hand Synopsys has an analysts' consensus of $637.78 which suggests that it could grow by 29.58%. Given that Uber Technologies has higher upside potential than Synopsys, analysts believe Uber Technologies is more attractive than Synopsys.

Uber Technologies has a beta of 1.330, which suggesting that the stock is 33.034% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Synopsys has a beta of 1.083, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.289%.

Uber Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Synopsys offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Uber Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Synopsys pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Uber Technologies quarterly revenues are $11.2B, which are larger than Synopsys quarterly revenues of $1.6B. Uber Technologies's net income of $2.6B is higher than Synopsys's net income of $1.1B. Notably, Uber Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is 30.21x while Synopsys's PE ratio is 33.89x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Uber Technologies is 3.08x versus 12.24x for Synopsys. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.