MSTR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Cloudflare has a net margin of -555.78% compared to Strategy's net margin of -2.79%. Strategy's return on equity of -19.84% beat Cloudflare's return on equity of -8.83%.

Strategy has a consensus price target of $514.09, signalling upside risk potential of 71.38%. On the other hand Cloudflare has an analysts' consensus of $140.22 which suggests that it could grow by 31.97%. Given that Strategy has higher upside potential than Cloudflare, analysts believe Strategy is more attractive than Cloudflare.

Strategy has a beta of 3.460, which suggesting that the stock is 246.014% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cloudflare has a beta of 1.593, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 59.303%.

Strategy has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Cloudflare offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Strategy pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Cloudflare pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Strategy quarterly revenues are $120.7M, which are smaller than Cloudflare quarterly revenues of $459.9M. Strategy's net income of -$670.8M is lower than Cloudflare's net income of -$12.8M. Notably, Strategy's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Cloudflare's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Strategy is 124.59x versus 21.73x for Cloudflare. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Oracle has a net margin of -555.78% compared to Strategy's net margin of 20.78%. Strategy's return on equity of -19.84% beat Oracle's return on equity of 104.49%.

Strategy has a consensus price target of $514.09, signalling upside risk potential of 71.38%. On the other hand Oracle has an analysts' consensus of $184.26 which suggests that it could grow by 39.23%. Given that Strategy has higher upside potential than Oracle, analysts believe Strategy is more attractive than Oracle.

Strategy has a beta of 3.460, which suggesting that the stock is 246.014% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Oracle has a beta of 1.225, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 22.513%.

Strategy has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Oracle offers a yield of 1.29% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. Strategy pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Oracle pays out 41.95% of its earnings as a dividend. Oracle's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Strategy quarterly revenues are $120.7M, which are smaller than Oracle quarterly revenues of $14.1B. Strategy's net income of -$670.8M is lower than Oracle's net income of $2.9B. Notably, Strategy's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Oracle's PE ratio is 31.07x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Strategy is 124.59x versus 6.78x for Oracle. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Uber Technologies has a net margin of -555.78% compared to Strategy's net margin of 57.56%. Strategy's return on equity of -19.84% beat Uber Technologies's return on equity of 63.2%.

Strategy has a consensus price target of $514.09, signalling upside risk potential of 71.38%. On the other hand Uber Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $88.78 which suggests that it could grow by 22.83%. Given that Strategy has higher upside potential than Uber Technologies, analysts believe Strategy is more attractive than Uber Technologies.

Strategy has a beta of 3.460, which suggesting that the stock is 246.014% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Uber Technologies has a beta of 1.368, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 36.765%.

Strategy has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Uber Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Strategy pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Uber Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Strategy quarterly revenues are $120.7M, which are smaller than Uber Technologies quarterly revenues of $12B. Strategy's net income of -$670.8M is lower than Uber Technologies's net income of $6.9B. Notably, Strategy's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Uber Technologies's PE ratio is 15.85x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Strategy is 124.59x versus 3.50x for Uber Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Clear Secure has a net margin of -555.78% compared to Strategy's net margin of 50.07%. Strategy's return on equity of -19.84% beat Clear Secure's return on equity of 65.98%.

Strategy has a consensus price target of $514.09, signalling upside risk potential of 71.38%. On the other hand Clear Secure has an analysts' consensus of $30.50 which suggests that it could grow by 12.88%. Given that Strategy has higher upside potential than Clear Secure, analysts believe Strategy is more attractive than Clear Secure.

Strategy has a beta of 3.460, which suggesting that the stock is 246.014% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Clear Secure has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Strategy has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Clear Secure offers a yield of 1.67% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. Strategy pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Clear Secure pays out 55.03% of its earnings as a dividend. Clear Secure's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Strategy quarterly revenues are $120.7M, which are smaller than Clear Secure quarterly revenues of $206.3M. Strategy's net income of -$670.8M is lower than Clear Secure's net income of $103.3M. Notably, Strategy's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Clear Secure's PE ratio is 17.55x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Strategy is 124.59x versus 3.32x for Clear Secure. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.