MSTR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

CrowdStrike Holdings has a net margin of -293.07% compared to MicroStrategy's net margin of -1.67%. MicroStrategy's return on equity of -16.93% beat CrowdStrike Holdings's return on equity of 4.89%.

MicroStrategy has a consensus price target of $518.68, signalling upside risk potential of 56.12%. On the other hand CrowdStrike Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $376.13 which suggests that it could grow by 4.05%. Given that MicroStrategy has higher upside potential than CrowdStrike Holdings, analysts believe MicroStrategy is more attractive than CrowdStrike Holdings.

MicroStrategy has a beta of 3.175, which suggesting that the stock is 217.477% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CrowdStrike Holdings has a beta of 1.112, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.217%.

MicroStrategy has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. CrowdStrike Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. MicroStrategy pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CrowdStrike Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

MicroStrategy quarterly revenues are $116.1M, which are smaller than CrowdStrike Holdings quarterly revenues of $1B. MicroStrategy's net income of -$340.2M is lower than CrowdStrike Holdings's net income of -$16.8M. Notably, MicroStrategy's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while CrowdStrike Holdings's PE ratio is 708.82x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MicroStrategy is 137.78x versus 24.04x for CrowdStrike Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Intuit has a net margin of -293.07% compared to MicroStrategy's net margin of 6%. MicroStrategy's return on equity of -16.93% beat Intuit's return on equity of 16.36%.

MicroStrategy has a consensus price target of $518.68, signalling upside risk potential of 56.12%. On the other hand Intuit has an analysts' consensus of $728.08 which suggests that it could grow by 14.07%. Given that MicroStrategy has higher upside potential than Intuit, analysts believe MicroStrategy is more attractive than Intuit.

MicroStrategy has a beta of 3.175, which suggesting that the stock is 217.477% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Intuit has a beta of 1.245, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 24.516%.

MicroStrategy has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Intuit offers a yield of 0.59% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.04 per share. MicroStrategy pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Intuit pays out 34.9% of its earnings as a dividend. Intuit's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

MicroStrategy quarterly revenues are $116.1M, which are smaller than Intuit quarterly revenues of $3.3B. MicroStrategy's net income of -$340.2M is lower than Intuit's net income of $197M. Notably, MicroStrategy's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Intuit's PE ratio is 61.97x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MicroStrategy is 137.78x versus 10.92x for Intuit. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Microsoft has a net margin of -293.07% compared to MicroStrategy's net margin of 37.61%. MicroStrategy's return on equity of -16.93% beat Microsoft's return on equity of 35.68%.

MicroStrategy has a consensus price target of $518.68, signalling upside risk potential of 56.12%. On the other hand Microsoft has an analysts' consensus of $508.55 which suggests that it could grow by 16.84%. Given that MicroStrategy has higher upside potential than Microsoft, analysts believe MicroStrategy is more attractive than Microsoft.

MicroStrategy has a beta of 3.175, which suggesting that the stock is 217.477% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Microsoft has a beta of 0.899, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.139%.

MicroStrategy has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Microsoft offers a yield of 0.71% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share. MicroStrategy pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Microsoft pays out 24.7% of its earnings as a dividend. Microsoft's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

MicroStrategy quarterly revenues are $116.1M, which are smaller than Microsoft quarterly revenues of $65.6B. MicroStrategy's net income of -$340.2M is lower than Microsoft's net income of $24.7B. Notably, MicroStrategy's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Microsoft's PE ratio is 35.91x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MicroStrategy is 137.78x versus 12.79x for Microsoft. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Snowflake has a net margin of -293.07% compared to MicroStrategy's net margin of -34.42%. MicroStrategy's return on equity of -16.93% beat Snowflake's return on equity of -25.9%.

MicroStrategy has a consensus price target of $518.68, signalling upside risk potential of 56.12%. On the other hand Snowflake has an analysts' consensus of $184.12 which suggests that it could grow by 14.05%. Given that MicroStrategy has higher upside potential than Snowflake, analysts believe MicroStrategy is more attractive than Snowflake.

MicroStrategy has a beta of 3.175, which suggesting that the stock is 217.477% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Snowflake has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

MicroStrategy has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Snowflake offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. MicroStrategy pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Snowflake pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

MicroStrategy quarterly revenues are $116.1M, which are smaller than Snowflake quarterly revenues of $942.1M. MicroStrategy's net income of -$340.2M is lower than Snowflake's net income of -$324.3M. Notably, MicroStrategy's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Snowflake's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MicroStrategy is 137.78x versus 15.73x for Snowflake. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.