ORCL Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Asana has a net margin of 20.78% compared to Oracle's net margin of -33.08%. Oracle's return on equity of 104.49% beat Asana's return on equity of -90.94%.

Oracle has a consensus price target of $184.41, signalling upside risk potential of 48.12%. On the other hand Asana has an analysts' consensus of $15.63 which suggests that it could grow by 13.35%. Given that Oracle has higher upside potential than Asana, analysts believe Oracle is more attractive than Asana.

Oracle has a beta of 1.225, which suggesting that the stock is 22.513% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Asana has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Oracle has a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.29%. Asana offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Oracle pays 41.95% of its earnings as a dividend. Asana pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Oracle's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Oracle quarterly revenues are $14.1B, which are larger than Asana quarterly revenues of $188.3M. Oracle's net income of $2.9B is higher than Asana's net income of -$62.3M. Notably, Oracle's price-to-earnings ratio is 29.23x while Asana's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Oracle is 6.38x versus 4.37x for Asana. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Salesforce has a net margin of 20.78% compared to Oracle's net margin of 17.09%. Oracle's return on equity of 104.49% beat Salesforce's return on equity of 10.45%.

Oracle has a consensus price target of $184.41, signalling upside risk potential of 48.12%. On the other hand Salesforce has an analysts' consensus of $375.05 which suggests that it could grow by 53.71%. Given that Salesforce has higher upside potential than Oracle, analysts believe Salesforce is more attractive than Oracle.

Oracle has a beta of 1.225, which suggesting that the stock is 22.513% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Salesforce has a beta of 1.379, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 37.885%.

Oracle has a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.29%. Salesforce offers a yield of 0.66% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. Oracle pays 41.95% of its earnings as a dividend. Salesforce pays out 24.8% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Oracle quarterly revenues are $14.1B, which are larger than Salesforce quarterly revenues of $10B. Oracle's net income of $2.9B is higher than Salesforce's net income of $1.7B. Notably, Oracle's price-to-earnings ratio is 29.23x while Salesforce's PE ratio is 38.36x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Oracle is 6.38x versus 6.27x for Salesforce. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Microsoft has a net margin of 20.78% compared to Oracle's net margin of 34.62%. Oracle's return on equity of 104.49% beat Microsoft's return on equity of 34.34%.

Oracle has a consensus price target of $184.41, signalling upside risk potential of 48.12%. On the other hand Microsoft has an analysts' consensus of $501.90 which suggests that it could grow by 41.56%. Given that Oracle has higher upside potential than Microsoft, analysts believe Oracle is more attractive than Microsoft.

Oracle has a beta of 1.225, which suggesting that the stock is 22.513% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Microsoft has a beta of 1.003, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.29399999999999%.

Oracle has a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.29%. Microsoft offers a yield of 0.89% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share. Oracle pays 41.95% of its earnings as a dividend. Microsoft pays out 24.7% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Oracle quarterly revenues are $14.1B, which are smaller than Microsoft quarterly revenues of $69.6B. Oracle's net income of $2.9B is lower than Microsoft's net income of $24.1B. Notably, Oracle's price-to-earnings ratio is 29.23x while Microsoft's PE ratio is 28.55x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Oracle is 6.38x versus 10.12x for Microsoft. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Workday has a net margin of 20.78% compared to Oracle's net margin of 4.25%. Oracle's return on equity of 104.49% beat Workday's return on equity of 6.23%.

Oracle has a consensus price target of $184.41, signalling upside risk potential of 48.12%. On the other hand Workday has an analysts' consensus of $311.19 which suggests that it could grow by 47.86%. Given that Oracle has higher upside potential than Workday, analysts believe Oracle is more attractive than Workday.

Oracle has a beta of 1.225, which suggesting that the stock is 22.513% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Workday has a beta of 1.323, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.275%.

Oracle has a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.29%. Workday offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Oracle pays 41.95% of its earnings as a dividend. Workday pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Oracle's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Oracle quarterly revenues are $14.1B, which are larger than Workday quarterly revenues of $2.2B. Oracle's net income of $2.9B is higher than Workday's net income of $94M. Notably, Oracle's price-to-earnings ratio is 29.23x while Workday's PE ratio is 107.38x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Oracle is 6.38x versus 6.71x for Workday. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.