SMRT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Autodesk has a net margin of -24.5% compared to SmartRent's net margin of 17.52%. SmartRent's return on equity of -7.72% beat Autodesk's return on equity of 51.52%.

SmartRent has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 43.08%. On the other hand Autodesk has an analysts' consensus of $328.59 which suggests that it could grow by 15.31%. Given that SmartRent has higher upside potential than Autodesk, analysts believe SmartRent is more attractive than Autodesk.

SmartRent has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Autodesk has a beta of 1.422, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 42.199%.

SmartRent has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Autodesk offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. SmartRent pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Autodesk pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

SmartRent quarterly revenues are $40.5M, which are smaller than Autodesk quarterly revenues of $1.6B. SmartRent's net income of -$9.9M is lower than Autodesk's net income of $275M. Notably, SmartRent's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Autodesk's PE ratio is 56.54x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SmartRent is 1.61x versus 10.36x for Autodesk. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Agilysys has a net margin of -24.5% compared to SmartRent's net margin of 2%. SmartRent's return on equity of -7.72% beat Agilysys's return on equity of 42.17%.

SmartRent has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 43.08%. On the other hand Agilysys has an analysts' consensus of $151.50 which suggests that it could grow by 18.29%. Given that SmartRent has higher upside potential than Agilysys, analysts believe SmartRent is more attractive than Agilysys.

SmartRent has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Agilysys has a beta of 0.940, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.952%.

SmartRent has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Agilysys offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. SmartRent pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Agilysys pays out 1.93% of its earnings as a dividend. Agilysys's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

SmartRent quarterly revenues are $40.5M, which are smaller than Agilysys quarterly revenues of $68.3M. SmartRent's net income of -$9.9M is lower than Agilysys's net income of $1.4M. Notably, SmartRent's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Agilysys's PE ratio is 36.49x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SmartRent is 1.61x versus 14.00x for Agilysys. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Inuvo has a net margin of -24.5% compared to SmartRent's net margin of -9.14%. SmartRent's return on equity of -7.72% beat Inuvo's return on equity of -54%.

SmartRent has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 43.08%. On the other hand Inuvo has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 70.25%. Given that Inuvo has higher upside potential than SmartRent, analysts believe Inuvo is more attractive than SmartRent.

SmartRent has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Inuvo has a beta of 0.937, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.269%.

SmartRent has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Inuvo offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. SmartRent pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Inuvo pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

SmartRent quarterly revenues are $40.5M, which are larger than Inuvo quarterly revenues of $22.4M. SmartRent's net income of -$9.9M is lower than Inuvo's net income of -$2M. Notably, SmartRent's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Inuvo's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SmartRent is 1.61x versus 0.99x for Inuvo. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Issuer Direct has a net margin of -24.5% compared to SmartRent's net margin of -6.7%. SmartRent's return on equity of -7.72% beat Issuer Direct's return on equity of -3.74%.

SmartRent has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 43.08%. On the other hand Issuer Direct has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 56.44%. Given that Issuer Direct has higher upside potential than SmartRent, analysts believe Issuer Direct is more attractive than SmartRent.

SmartRent has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Issuer Direct has a beta of 0.769, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.119%.

SmartRent has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Issuer Direct offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. SmartRent pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Issuer Direct pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

SmartRent quarterly revenues are $40.5M, which are larger than Issuer Direct quarterly revenues of $7M. SmartRent's net income of -$9.9M is lower than Issuer Direct's net income of -$466K. Notably, SmartRent's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Issuer Direct's PE ratio is 59.85x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SmartRent is 1.61x versus 1.09x for Issuer Direct. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.