ADP Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Adobe has a net margin of 20.17% compared to Automatic Data Processing's net margin of 31.69%. Automatic Data Processing's return on equity of 82.22% beat Adobe's return on equity of 46.85%.

Automatic Data Processing has a consensus price target of $308.61, signalling upside risk potential of 4.92%. On the other hand Adobe has an analysts' consensus of $501.45 which suggests that it could grow by 45.69%. Given that Adobe has higher upside potential than Automatic Data Processing, analysts believe Adobe is more attractive than Automatic Data Processing.

Automatic Data Processing has a beta of 0.738, which suggesting that the stock is 26.191% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Adobe has a beta of 1.490, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 48.965%.

Automatic Data Processing has a quarterly dividend of $1.54 per share corresponding to a yield of 2%. Adobe offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Automatic Data Processing pays 58.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Adobe pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Automatic Data Processing's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Automatic Data Processing quarterly revenues are $4.8B, which are smaller than Adobe quarterly revenues of $5.7B. Automatic Data Processing's net income of $963.2M is lower than Adobe's net income of $1.8B. Notably, Automatic Data Processing's price-to-earnings ratio is 30.67x while Adobe's PE ratio is 22.67x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Automatic Data Processing is 6.42x versus 6.95x for Adobe. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Autodesk has a net margin of 20.17% compared to Automatic Data Processing's net margin of 18.49%. Automatic Data Processing's return on equity of 82.22% beat Autodesk's return on equity of 47.41%.

Automatic Data Processing has a consensus price target of $308.61, signalling upside risk potential of 4.92%. On the other hand Autodesk has an analysts' consensus of $321.15 which suggests that it could grow by 23.44%. Given that Autodesk has higher upside potential than Automatic Data Processing, analysts believe Autodesk is more attractive than Automatic Data Processing.

Automatic Data Processing has a beta of 0.738, which suggesting that the stock is 26.191% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Autodesk has a beta of 1.494, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 49.404%.

Automatic Data Processing has a quarterly dividend of $1.54 per share corresponding to a yield of 2%. Autodesk offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Automatic Data Processing pays 58.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Autodesk pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Automatic Data Processing's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Automatic Data Processing quarterly revenues are $4.8B, which are larger than Autodesk quarterly revenues of $1.6B. Automatic Data Processing's net income of $963.2M is higher than Autodesk's net income of $303M. Notably, Automatic Data Processing's price-to-earnings ratio is 30.67x while Autodesk's PE ratio is 50.71x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Automatic Data Processing is 6.42x versus 9.21x for Autodesk. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Inuvo has a net margin of 20.17% compared to Automatic Data Processing's net margin of 0.54%. Automatic Data Processing's return on equity of 82.22% beat Inuvo's return on equity of -40.29%.

Automatic Data Processing has a consensus price target of $308.61, signalling upside risk potential of 4.92%. On the other hand Inuvo has an analysts' consensus of $1.40 which suggests that it could grow by 274.33%. Given that Inuvo has higher upside potential than Automatic Data Processing, analysts believe Inuvo is more attractive than Automatic Data Processing.

Automatic Data Processing has a beta of 0.738, which suggesting that the stock is 26.191% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Inuvo has a beta of 0.912, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.768%.

Automatic Data Processing has a quarterly dividend of $1.54 per share corresponding to a yield of 2%. Inuvo offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Automatic Data Processing pays 58.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Inuvo pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Automatic Data Processing's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Automatic Data Processing quarterly revenues are $4.8B, which are larger than Inuvo quarterly revenues of $26.2M. Automatic Data Processing's net income of $963.2M is higher than Inuvo's net income of $141.3K. Notably, Automatic Data Processing's price-to-earnings ratio is 30.67x while Inuvo's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Automatic Data Processing is 6.42x versus 0.62x for Inuvo. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Microsoft has a net margin of 20.17% compared to Automatic Data Processing's net margin of 34.62%. Automatic Data Processing's return on equity of 82.22% beat Microsoft's return on equity of 34.34%.

Automatic Data Processing has a consensus price target of $308.61, signalling upside risk potential of 4.92%. On the other hand Microsoft has an analysts' consensus of $497.18 which suggests that it could grow by 33.79%. Given that Microsoft has higher upside potential than Automatic Data Processing, analysts believe Microsoft is more attractive than Automatic Data Processing.

Automatic Data Processing has a beta of 0.738, which suggesting that the stock is 26.191% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Microsoft has a beta of 1.003, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.29399999999999%.

Automatic Data Processing has a quarterly dividend of $1.54 per share corresponding to a yield of 2%. Microsoft offers a yield of 0.85% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share. Automatic Data Processing pays 58.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Microsoft pays out 24.7% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Automatic Data Processing quarterly revenues are $4.8B, which are smaller than Microsoft quarterly revenues of $69.6B. Automatic Data Processing's net income of $963.2M is lower than Microsoft's net income of $24.1B. Notably, Automatic Data Processing's price-to-earnings ratio is 30.67x while Microsoft's PE ratio is 29.92x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Automatic Data Processing is 6.42x versus 10.60x for Microsoft. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.