ADP Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Microsoft has a net margin of 20.88% compared to Automatic Data Processing's net margin of 37.61%. Automatic Data Processing's return on equity of 86.24% beat Microsoft's return on equity of 35.68%.

Automatic Data Processing has a consensus price target of $273.98, signalling upside risk potential of 0.97%. On the other hand Microsoft has an analysts' consensus of $507.50 which suggests that it could grow by 16.24%. Given that Microsoft has higher upside potential than Automatic Data Processing, analysts believe Microsoft is more attractive than Automatic Data Processing.

Automatic Data Processing has a beta of 0.786, which suggesting that the stock is 21.393% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Microsoft has a beta of 0.899, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.139%.

Automatic Data Processing has a quarterly dividend of $1.54 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.95%. Microsoft offers a yield of 0.71% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share. Automatic Data Processing pays 58.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Microsoft pays out 24.7% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Automatic Data Processing quarterly revenues are $4.6B, which are smaller than Microsoft quarterly revenues of $65.6B. Automatic Data Processing's net income of $956.3M is lower than Microsoft's net income of $24.7B. Notably, Automatic Data Processing's price-to-earnings ratio is 31.38x while Microsoft's PE ratio is 36.02x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Automatic Data Processing is 6.55x versus 12.83x for Microsoft. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Paychex has a net margin of 20.88% compared to Automatic Data Processing's net margin of 31.39%. Automatic Data Processing's return on equity of 86.24% beat Paychex's return on equity of 45.61%.

Automatic Data Processing has a consensus price target of $273.98, signalling upside risk potential of 0.97%. On the other hand Paychex has an analysts' consensus of $136.63 which suggests that it could fall by -2.08%. Given that Automatic Data Processing has higher upside potential than Paychex, analysts believe Automatic Data Processing is more attractive than Paychex.

Automatic Data Processing has a beta of 0.786, which suggesting that the stock is 21.393% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Paychex has a beta of 0.991, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.909%.

Automatic Data Processing has a quarterly dividend of $1.54 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.95%. Paychex offers a yield of 2.75% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.98 per share. Automatic Data Processing pays 58.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Paychex pays out 77.81% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Automatic Data Processing quarterly revenues are $4.6B, which are larger than Paychex quarterly revenues of $1.3B. Automatic Data Processing's net income of $956.3M is higher than Paychex's net income of $413.4M. Notably, Automatic Data Processing's price-to-earnings ratio is 31.38x while Paychex's PE ratio is 29.38x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Automatic Data Processing is 6.55x versus 9.40x for Paychex. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Synopsys has a net margin of 20.88% compared to Automatic Data Processing's net margin of 68.1%. Automatic Data Processing's return on equity of 86.24% beat Synopsys's return on equity of 30.71%.

Automatic Data Processing has a consensus price target of $273.98, signalling upside risk potential of 0.97%. On the other hand Synopsys has an analysts' consensus of $637.78 which suggests that it could grow by 29.58%. Given that Synopsys has higher upside potential than Automatic Data Processing, analysts believe Synopsys is more attractive than Automatic Data Processing.

Automatic Data Processing has a beta of 0.786, which suggesting that the stock is 21.393% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Synopsys has a beta of 1.083, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.289%.

Automatic Data Processing has a quarterly dividend of $1.54 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.95%. Synopsys offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Automatic Data Processing pays 58.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Synopsys pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Automatic Data Processing's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Automatic Data Processing quarterly revenues are $4.6B, which are larger than Synopsys quarterly revenues of $1.6B. Automatic Data Processing's net income of $956.3M is lower than Synopsys's net income of $1.1B. Notably, Automatic Data Processing's price-to-earnings ratio is 31.38x while Synopsys's PE ratio is 33.89x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Automatic Data Processing is 6.55x versus 12.24x for Synopsys. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Uber Technologies has a net margin of 20.88% compared to Automatic Data Processing's net margin of 23.35%. Automatic Data Processing's return on equity of 86.24% beat Uber Technologies's return on equity of 33.34%.

Automatic Data Processing has a consensus price target of $273.98, signalling upside risk potential of 0.97%. On the other hand Uber Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $90.05 which suggests that it could grow by 48.29%. Given that Uber Technologies has higher upside potential than Automatic Data Processing, analysts believe Uber Technologies is more attractive than Automatic Data Processing.

Automatic Data Processing has a beta of 0.786, which suggesting that the stock is 21.393% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Uber Technologies has a beta of 1.330, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 33.034%.

Automatic Data Processing has a quarterly dividend of $1.54 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.95%. Uber Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Automatic Data Processing pays 58.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Uber Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Automatic Data Processing's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Automatic Data Processing quarterly revenues are $4.6B, which are smaller than Uber Technologies quarterly revenues of $11.2B. Automatic Data Processing's net income of $956.3M is lower than Uber Technologies's net income of $2.6B. Notably, Automatic Data Processing's price-to-earnings ratio is 31.38x while Uber Technologies's PE ratio is 30.21x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Automatic Data Processing is 6.55x versus 3.08x for Uber Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.