Financhill
Sell
47

SM Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Last price:
$42.63
Seasonality move :
7.59%
Day range:
$40.92 - $42.69
52-week range:
$34.76 - $53.26
Dividend yield:
1.73%
P/E ratio:
5.96x
P/S ratio:
2.03x
P/B ratio:
1.20x
Volume:
2.1M
Avg. volume:
1.3M
1-year change:
11.58%
Market cap:
$4.9B
Revenue:
$2.4B
EPS (TTM):
$7.16

Price Performance History

Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Competitors

Company Revenue Forecast Earnings Forecast Revenue Growth Forecast Earnings Growth Forecast Analyst Price Target Median
SM
SM Energy
$865.7M $1.95 42.66% -7.91% $53.07
CRK
Comstock Resources
$371.3M $0.03 -5.65% -97.75% $11.54
CTRA
Coterra Energy
$1.4B $0.43 -12.65% -23.22% $33.19
DVN
Devon Energy
$4.1B $0.99 0.02% -45.63% $49.94
EPM
Evolution Petroleum
$22.7M $0.02 8.1% -33.33% $7.63
GPOR
Gulfport Energy
$338.6M $4.40 28.71% 131.75% $192.70
Company Price Analyst Target Market Cap P/E Ratio Dividend per Share Dividend Yield Price / LTM Sales
SM
SM Energy
$42.68 $53.07 $4.9B 5.96x $0.20 1.73% 2.03x
CRK
Comstock Resources
$18.79 $11.54 $5.5B 44.41x $0.13 0% 4.11x
CTRA
Coterra Energy
$26.36 $33.19 $19.4B 15.98x $0.21 3.19% 3.49x
DVN
Devon Energy
$34.69 $49.94 $22.8B 6.44x $0.22 4.18% 1.39x
EPM
Evolution Petroleum
$5.33 $7.63 $179.1M 38.07x $0.12 9.01% 2.01x
GPOR
Gulfport Energy
$186.07 $192.70 $3.3B 16.72x $0.00 0% 3.78x
Company Total Debt / Total Capital Beta Debt to Equity Quick Ratio
SM
SM Energy
39.99% 1.444 59.18% 3.38x
CRK
Comstock Resources
56.23% 0.889 88.84% 0.37x
CTRA
Coterra Energy
13.68% 1.044 11.72% 1.49x
DVN
Devon Energy
38.36% 0.546 34.23% 0.84x
EPM
Evolution Petroleum
33.16% 1.913 22.13% 1.43x
GPOR
Gulfport Energy
24.85% 1.633 25.33% 0.33x
Company Gross Profit Operating Income Return on Invested Capital Return on Common Equity EBIT Margin Free Cash Flow
SM
SM Energy
$291.1M $244.7M 15% 22.26% 54.23% $149.3M
CRK
Comstock Resources
-$52.3M -$62.2M -1.24% -2.66% 4.63% -$131.1M
CTRA
Coterra Energy
$476M $324M 8.09% 9.54% 25.53% $359M
DVN
Devon Energy
$1.3B $1.2B 17.54% 26.79% 28.88% -$2.8B
EPM
Evolution Petroleum
$4.4M $1.9M 4.3% 5.54% 16.94% $4.6M
GPOR
Gulfport Energy
$114.9M $7.1M 9.17% 12.01% -1.37% $57.6M

SM Energy vs. Competitors

  • Which has Higher Returns SM or CRK?

    Comstock Resources has a net margin of 37.44% compared to SM Energy's net margin of -9.49%. SM Energy's return on equity of 22.26% beat Comstock Resources's return on equity of -2.66%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    SM
    SM Energy
    45.31% $2.09 $6.8B
    CRK
    Comstock Resources
    -17.19% -$0.09 $5.3B
  • What do Analysts Say About SM or CRK?

    SM Energy has a consensus price target of $53.07, signalling upside risk potential of 24.34%. On the other hand Comstock Resources has an analysts' consensus of $11.54 which suggests that it could fall by -38.58%. Given that SM Energy has higher upside potential than Comstock Resources, analysts believe SM Energy is more attractive than Comstock Resources.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    SM
    SM Energy
    7 6 0
    CRK
    Comstock Resources
    1 9 2
  • Is SM or CRK More Risky?

    SM Energy has a beta of 4.149, which suggesting that the stock is 314.869% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Comstock Resources has a beta of 0.510, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 48.967%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock SM or CRK?

    SM Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.73%. Comstock Resources offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. SM Energy pays 8.76% of its earnings as a dividend. Comstock Resources pays out 65.59% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios SM or CRK?

    SM Energy quarterly revenues are $642.4M, which are larger than Comstock Resources quarterly revenues of $304.5M. SM Energy's net income of $240.5M is higher than Comstock Resources's net income of -$28.9M. Notably, SM Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 5.96x while Comstock Resources's PE ratio is 44.41x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SM Energy is 2.03x versus 4.11x for Comstock Resources. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    SM
    SM Energy
    2.03x 5.96x $642.4M $240.5M
    CRK
    Comstock Resources
    4.11x 44.41x $304.5M -$28.9M
  • Which has Higher Returns SM or CTRA?

    Coterra Energy has a net margin of 37.44% compared to SM Energy's net margin of 18.54%. SM Energy's return on equity of 22.26% beat Coterra Energy's return on equity of 9.54%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    SM
    SM Energy
    45.31% $2.09 $6.8B
    CTRA
    Coterra Energy
    35.03% $0.34 $15.1B
  • What do Analysts Say About SM or CTRA?

    SM Energy has a consensus price target of $53.07, signalling upside risk potential of 24.34%. On the other hand Coterra Energy has an analysts' consensus of $33.19 which suggests that it could grow by 25.93%. Given that Coterra Energy has higher upside potential than SM Energy, analysts believe Coterra Energy is more attractive than SM Energy.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    SM
    SM Energy
    7 6 0
    CTRA
    Coterra Energy
    11 4 0
  • Is SM or CTRA More Risky?

    SM Energy has a beta of 4.149, which suggesting that the stock is 314.869% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Coterra Energy has a beta of 0.270, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 73.012%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock SM or CTRA?

    SM Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.73%. Coterra Energy offers a yield of 3.19% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share. SM Energy pays 8.76% of its earnings as a dividend. Coterra Energy pays out 54.77% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios SM or CTRA?

    SM Energy quarterly revenues are $642.4M, which are smaller than Coterra Energy quarterly revenues of $1.4B. SM Energy's net income of $240.5M is lower than Coterra Energy's net income of $252M. Notably, SM Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 5.96x while Coterra Energy's PE ratio is 15.98x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SM Energy is 2.03x versus 3.49x for Coterra Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    SM
    SM Energy
    2.03x 5.96x $642.4M $240.5M
    CTRA
    Coterra Energy
    3.49x 15.98x $1.4B $252M
  • Which has Higher Returns SM or DVN?

    Devon Energy has a net margin of 37.44% compared to SM Energy's net margin of 20.18%. SM Energy's return on equity of 22.26% beat Devon Energy's return on equity of 26.79%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    SM
    SM Energy
    45.31% $2.09 $6.8B
    DVN
    Devon Energy
    32.75% $1.30 $23.4B
  • What do Analysts Say About SM or DVN?

    SM Energy has a consensus price target of $53.07, signalling upside risk potential of 24.34%. On the other hand Devon Energy has an analysts' consensus of $49.94 which suggests that it could grow by 43.96%. Given that Devon Energy has higher upside potential than SM Energy, analysts believe Devon Energy is more attractive than SM Energy.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    SM
    SM Energy
    7 6 0
    DVN
    Devon Energy
    12 11 0
  • Is SM or DVN More Risky?

    SM Energy has a beta of 4.149, which suggesting that the stock is 314.869% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Devon Energy has a beta of 2.014, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 101.442%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock SM or DVN?

    SM Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.73%. Devon Energy offers a yield of 4.18% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share. SM Energy pays 8.76% of its earnings as a dividend. Devon Energy pays out 49.59% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios SM or DVN?

    SM Energy quarterly revenues are $642.4M, which are smaller than Devon Energy quarterly revenues of $4B. SM Energy's net income of $240.5M is lower than Devon Energy's net income of $812M. Notably, SM Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 5.96x while Devon Energy's PE ratio is 6.44x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SM Energy is 2.03x versus 1.39x for Devon Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    SM
    SM Energy
    2.03x 5.96x $642.4M $240.5M
    DVN
    Devon Energy
    1.39x 6.44x $4B $812M
  • Which has Higher Returns SM or EPM?

    Evolution Petroleum has a net margin of 37.44% compared to SM Energy's net margin of 9.43%. SM Energy's return on equity of 22.26% beat Evolution Petroleum's return on equity of 5.54%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    SM
    SM Energy
    45.31% $2.09 $6.8B
    EPM
    Evolution Petroleum
    20.01% $0.06 $119.1M
  • What do Analysts Say About SM or EPM?

    SM Energy has a consensus price target of $53.07, signalling upside risk potential of 24.34%. On the other hand Evolution Petroleum has an analysts' consensus of $7.63 which suggests that it could grow by 43.06%. Given that Evolution Petroleum has higher upside potential than SM Energy, analysts believe Evolution Petroleum is more attractive than SM Energy.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    SM
    SM Energy
    7 6 0
    EPM
    Evolution Petroleum
    1 0 0
  • Is SM or EPM More Risky?

    SM Energy has a beta of 4.149, which suggesting that the stock is 314.869% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Evolution Petroleum has a beta of 0.880, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.953%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock SM or EPM?

    SM Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.73%. Evolution Petroleum offers a yield of 9.01% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share. SM Energy pays 8.76% of its earnings as a dividend. Evolution Petroleum pays out 393.14% of its earnings as a dividend. SM Energy's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Evolution Petroleum's is not.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios SM or EPM?

    SM Energy quarterly revenues are $642.4M, which are larger than Evolution Petroleum quarterly revenues of $21.9M. SM Energy's net income of $240.5M is higher than Evolution Petroleum's net income of $2.1M. Notably, SM Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 5.96x while Evolution Petroleum's PE ratio is 38.07x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SM Energy is 2.03x versus 2.01x for Evolution Petroleum. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    SM
    SM Energy
    2.03x 5.96x $642.4M $240.5M
    EPM
    Evolution Petroleum
    2.01x 38.07x $21.9M $2.1M
  • Which has Higher Returns SM or GPOR?

    Gulfport Energy has a net margin of 37.44% compared to SM Energy's net margin of -6.47%. SM Energy's return on equity of 22.26% beat Gulfport Energy's return on equity of 12.01%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    SM
    SM Energy
    45.31% $2.09 $6.8B
    GPOR
    Gulfport Energy
    53.21% -$0.83 $2.8B
  • What do Analysts Say About SM or GPOR?

    SM Energy has a consensus price target of $53.07, signalling upside risk potential of 24.34%. On the other hand Gulfport Energy has an analysts' consensus of $192.70 which suggests that it could grow by 3.56%. Given that SM Energy has higher upside potential than Gulfport Energy, analysts believe SM Energy is more attractive than Gulfport Energy.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    SM
    SM Energy
    7 6 0
    GPOR
    Gulfport Energy
    6 3 0
  • Is SM or GPOR More Risky?

    SM Energy has a beta of 4.149, which suggesting that the stock is 314.869% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Gulfport Energy has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock SM or GPOR?

    SM Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.73%. Gulfport Energy offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. SM Energy pays 8.76% of its earnings as a dividend. Gulfport Energy pays out 0.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios SM or GPOR?

    SM Energy quarterly revenues are $642.4M, which are larger than Gulfport Energy quarterly revenues of $215.9M. SM Energy's net income of $240.5M is higher than Gulfport Energy's net income of -$14M. Notably, SM Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 5.96x while Gulfport Energy's PE ratio is 16.72x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SM Energy is 2.03x versus 3.78x for Gulfport Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    SM
    SM Energy
    2.03x 5.96x $642.4M $240.5M
    GPOR
    Gulfport Energy
    3.78x 16.72x $215.9M -$14M

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Popular

Where Will Cisco Systems Stock Be in 10 Years?
Where Will Cisco Systems Stock Be in 10 Years?

Cisco Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ:CSCO) has enjoyed its position as a…

Disney vs Estée Lauder Stock, Which Is Best?
Disney vs Estée Lauder Stock, Which Is Best?

Inflation has eaten away at a lot of the money…

Is SCHD a Good ETF to Buy?
Is SCHD a Good ETF to Buy?

With around $65.7 billion in net assets, Schwab’s US Dividend…

Stock Ideas

Sell
40
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.7T
P/E Ratio: 40x

Buy
52
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.4T
P/E Ratio: 117x

Sell
43
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.1T
P/E Ratio: 36x

Alerts

Buy
57
NARI alert for Jan 8

Inari Medical [NARI] is down 0.23% over the past day.

Buy
69
UNF alert for Jan 8

UniFirst [UNF] is up 4.97% over the past day.

Sell
31
APOG alert for Jan 8

Apogee Enterprises [APOG] is down 8.78% over the past day.

THE #1 STOCK ANALYSIS TOOL
TO MAKE SMARTER BUY AND SELL DECISIONS

Show me the best stock