CRK Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Gulfport Energy has a net margin of -9.49% compared to Comstock Resources's net margin of -6.47%. Comstock Resources's return on equity of -2.66% beat Gulfport Energy's return on equity of 12.01%.

Comstock Resources has a consensus price target of $11.63, signalling downside risk potential of -40.75%. On the other hand Gulfport Energy has an analysts' consensus of $192.70 which suggests that it could grow by 3.56%. Given that Gulfport Energy has higher upside potential than Comstock Resources, analysts believe Gulfport Energy is more attractive than Comstock Resources.

Comstock Resources has a beta of 0.510, which suggesting that the stock is 48.967% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Gulfport Energy has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Comstock Resources has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Gulfport Energy offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Comstock Resources pays 65.59% of its earnings as a dividend. Gulfport Energy pays out 0.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Comstock Resources quarterly revenues are $304.5M, which are larger than Gulfport Energy quarterly revenues of $215.9M. Comstock Resources's net income of -$28.9M is lower than Gulfport Energy's net income of -$14M. Notably, Comstock Resources's price-to-earnings ratio is 44.41x while Gulfport Energy's PE ratio is 16.72x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Comstock Resources is 4.29x versus 3.78x for Gulfport Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

PrimeEnergy Resources has a net margin of -9.49% compared to Comstock Resources's net margin of 33.12%. Comstock Resources's return on equity of -2.66% beat PrimeEnergy Resources's return on equity of 33.66%.

Comstock Resources has a consensus price target of $11.63, signalling downside risk potential of -40.75%. On the other hand PrimeEnergy Resources has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Comstock Resources has higher upside potential than PrimeEnergy Resources, analysts believe Comstock Resources is more attractive than PrimeEnergy Resources.

Comstock Resources has a beta of 0.510, which suggesting that the stock is 48.967% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PrimeEnergy Resources has a beta of 0.540, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 46.039%.

Comstock Resources has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. PrimeEnergy Resources offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Comstock Resources pays 65.59% of its earnings as a dividend. PrimeEnergy Resources pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Comstock Resources's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Comstock Resources quarterly revenues are $304.5M, which are larger than PrimeEnergy Resources quarterly revenues of $66.7M. Comstock Resources's net income of -$28.9M is lower than PrimeEnergy Resources's net income of $22.1M. Notably, Comstock Resources's price-to-earnings ratio is 44.41x while PrimeEnergy Resources's PE ratio is 8.74x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Comstock Resources is 4.29x versus 2.47x for PrimeEnergy Resources. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Range Resources has a net margin of -9.49% compared to Comstock Resources's net margin of 8.92%. Comstock Resources's return on equity of -2.66% beat Range Resources's return on equity of 12.83%.

Comstock Resources has a consensus price target of $11.63, signalling downside risk potential of -40.75%. On the other hand Range Resources has an analysts' consensus of $35.60 which suggests that it could fall by -3.21%. Given that Comstock Resources has more downside risk than Range Resources, analysts believe Range Resources is more attractive than Comstock Resources.

Comstock Resources has a beta of 0.510, which suggesting that the stock is 48.967% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Range Resources has a beta of 1.815, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 81.5%.

Comstock Resources has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Range Resources offers a yield of 0.87% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. Comstock Resources pays 65.59% of its earnings as a dividend. Range Resources pays out 8.87% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Comstock Resources quarterly revenues are $304.5M, which are smaller than Range Resources quarterly revenues of $567.9M. Comstock Resources's net income of -$28.9M is lower than Range Resources's net income of $50.7M. Notably, Comstock Resources's price-to-earnings ratio is 44.41x while Range Resources's PE ratio is 18.30x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Comstock Resources is 4.29x versus 3.79x for Range Resources. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SM Energy has a net margin of -9.49% compared to Comstock Resources's net margin of 37.44%. Comstock Resources's return on equity of -2.66% beat SM Energy's return on equity of 22.26%.

Comstock Resources has a consensus price target of $11.63, signalling downside risk potential of -40.75%. On the other hand SM Energy has an analysts' consensus of $53.07 which suggests that it could grow by 24.34%. Given that SM Energy has higher upside potential than Comstock Resources, analysts believe SM Energy is more attractive than Comstock Resources.

Comstock Resources has a beta of 0.510, which suggesting that the stock is 48.967% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SM Energy has a beta of 4.149, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 314.869%.

Comstock Resources has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. SM Energy offers a yield of 1.73% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share. Comstock Resources pays 65.59% of its earnings as a dividend. SM Energy pays out 8.76% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Comstock Resources quarterly revenues are $304.5M, which are smaller than SM Energy quarterly revenues of $642.4M. Comstock Resources's net income of -$28.9M is lower than SM Energy's net income of $240.5M. Notably, Comstock Resources's price-to-earnings ratio is 44.41x while SM Energy's PE ratio is 5.96x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Comstock Resources is 4.29x versus 2.03x for SM Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.