EPM Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Matador Resources has a net margin of 9.43% compared to Evolution Petroleum's net margin of 28.87%. Evolution Petroleum's return on equity of 5.54% beat Matador Resources's return on equity of 20.48%.

Evolution Petroleum has a consensus price target of $7.63, signalling upside risk potential of 43.33%. On the other hand Matador Resources has an analysts' consensus of $74.88 which suggests that it could grow by 24.63%. Given that Evolution Petroleum has higher upside potential than Matador Resources, analysts believe Evolution Petroleum is more attractive than Matador Resources.

Evolution Petroleum has a beta of 0.880, which suggesting that the stock is 11.953% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Matador Resources has a beta of 3.245, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 224.547%.

Evolution Petroleum has a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share corresponding to a yield of 9.02%. Matador Resources offers a yield of 1.42% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. Evolution Petroleum pays 393.14% of its earnings as a dividend. Matador Resources pays out 9.12% of its earnings as a dividend. Matador Resources's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Evolution Petroleum's is not.

Evolution Petroleum quarterly revenues are $21.9M, which are smaller than Matador Resources quarterly revenues of $860.1M. Evolution Petroleum's net income of $2.1M is lower than Matador Resources's net income of $248.3M. Notably, Evolution Petroleum's price-to-earnings ratio is 38.00x while Matador Resources's PE ratio is 7.96x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Evolution Petroleum is 2.01x versus 2.21x for Matador Resources. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Murphy Oil has a net margin of 9.43% compared to Evolution Petroleum's net margin of 18.47%. Evolution Petroleum's return on equity of 5.54% beat Murphy Oil's return on equity of 8.61%.

Evolution Petroleum has a consensus price target of $7.63, signalling upside risk potential of 43.33%. On the other hand Murphy Oil has an analysts' consensus of $41.47 which suggests that it could grow by 26.55%. Given that Evolution Petroleum has higher upside potential than Murphy Oil, analysts believe Evolution Petroleum is more attractive than Murphy Oil.

Evolution Petroleum has a beta of 0.880, which suggesting that the stock is 11.953% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Murphy Oil has a beta of 2.172, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 117.165%.

Evolution Petroleum has a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share corresponding to a yield of 9.02%. Murphy Oil offers a yield of 3.66% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share. Evolution Petroleum pays 393.14% of its earnings as a dividend. Murphy Oil pays out 25.85% of its earnings as a dividend. Murphy Oil's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Evolution Petroleum's is not.

Evolution Petroleum quarterly revenues are $21.9M, which are smaller than Murphy Oil quarterly revenues of $753.2M. Evolution Petroleum's net income of $2.1M is lower than Murphy Oil's net income of $139.1M. Notably, Evolution Petroleum's price-to-earnings ratio is 38.00x while Murphy Oil's PE ratio is 10.57x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Evolution Petroleum is 2.01x versus 1.57x for Murphy Oil. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ring Energy has a net margin of 9.43% compared to Evolution Petroleum's net margin of 37.96%. Evolution Petroleum's return on equity of 5.54% beat Ring Energy's return on equity of 14.15%.

Evolution Petroleum has a consensus price target of $7.63, signalling upside risk potential of 43.33%. On the other hand Ring Energy has an analysts' consensus of $3.00 which suggests that it could grow by 102.7%. Given that Ring Energy has higher upside potential than Evolution Petroleum, analysts believe Ring Energy is more attractive than Evolution Petroleum.

Evolution Petroleum has a beta of 0.880, which suggesting that the stock is 11.953% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ring Energy has a beta of 1.577, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 57.729%.

Evolution Petroleum has a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share corresponding to a yield of 9.02%. Ring Energy offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Evolution Petroleum pays 393.14% of its earnings as a dividend. Ring Energy pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Evolution Petroleum quarterly revenues are $21.9M, which are smaller than Ring Energy quarterly revenues of $89.2M. Evolution Petroleum's net income of $2.1M is lower than Ring Energy's net income of $33.9M. Notably, Evolution Petroleum's price-to-earnings ratio is 38.00x while Ring Energy's PE ratio is 2.60x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Evolution Petroleum is 2.01x versus 0.77x for Ring Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SM Energy has a net margin of 9.43% compared to Evolution Petroleum's net margin of 37.44%. Evolution Petroleum's return on equity of 5.54% beat SM Energy's return on equity of 22.26%.

Evolution Petroleum has a consensus price target of $7.63, signalling upside risk potential of 43.33%. On the other hand SM Energy has an analysts' consensus of $53.20 which suggests that it could grow by 24.74%. Given that Evolution Petroleum has higher upside potential than SM Energy, analysts believe Evolution Petroleum is more attractive than SM Energy.

Evolution Petroleum has a beta of 0.880, which suggesting that the stock is 11.953% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SM Energy has a beta of 4.149, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 314.869%.

Evolution Petroleum has a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share corresponding to a yield of 9.02%. SM Energy offers a yield of 1.74% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share. Evolution Petroleum pays 393.14% of its earnings as a dividend. SM Energy pays out 8.76% of its earnings as a dividend. SM Energy's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Evolution Petroleum's is not.

Evolution Petroleum quarterly revenues are $21.9M, which are smaller than SM Energy quarterly revenues of $642.4M. Evolution Petroleum's net income of $2.1M is lower than SM Energy's net income of $240.5M. Notably, Evolution Petroleum's price-to-earnings ratio is 38.00x while SM Energy's PE ratio is 5.96x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Evolution Petroleum is 2.01x versus 2.02x for SM Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.