OSK Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Cummins has a net margin of 5.89% compared to Oshkosh's net margin of 4.95%. Oshkosh's return on equity of 17.29% beat Cummins's return on equity of 37.07%.

Oshkosh has a consensus price target of $129.01, signalling upside risk potential of 34.71%. On the other hand Cummins has an analysts' consensus of $389.74 which suggests that it could grow by 21.15%. Given that Oshkosh has higher upside potential than Cummins, analysts believe Oshkosh is more attractive than Cummins.

Oshkosh has a beta of 1.211, which suggesting that the stock is 21.053% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cummins has a beta of 1.012, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.2%.

Oshkosh has a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.97%. Cummins offers a yield of 2.22% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.82 per share. Oshkosh pays 17.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Cummins pays out 24.56% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Oshkosh quarterly revenues are $2.6B, which are smaller than Cummins quarterly revenues of $8.4B. Oshkosh's net income of $153.1M is lower than Cummins's net income of $418M. Notably, Oshkosh's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.25x while Cummins's PE ratio is 11.42x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Oshkosh is 0.59x versus 1.31x for Cummins. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

PACCAR has a net margin of 5.89% compared to Oshkosh's net margin of 11.03%. Oshkosh's return on equity of 17.29% beat PACCAR's return on equity of 24.02%.

Oshkosh has a consensus price target of $129.01, signalling upside risk potential of 34.71%. On the other hand PACCAR has an analysts' consensus of $114.83 which suggests that it could grow by 15.74%. Given that Oshkosh has higher upside potential than PACCAR, analysts believe Oshkosh is more attractive than PACCAR.

Oshkosh has a beta of 1.211, which suggesting that the stock is 21.053% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PACCAR has a beta of 0.913, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.71%.

Oshkosh has a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.97%. PACCAR offers a yield of 1.24% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.33 per share. Oshkosh pays 17.61% of its earnings as a dividend. PACCAR pays out 54.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Oshkosh quarterly revenues are $2.6B, which are smaller than PACCAR quarterly revenues of $7.9B. Oshkosh's net income of $153.1M is lower than PACCAR's net income of $872M. Notably, Oshkosh's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.25x while PACCAR's PE ratio is 12.54x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Oshkosh is 0.59x versus 1.55x for PACCAR. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The Shyft Group has a net margin of 5.89% compared to Oshkosh's net margin of -1.69%. Oshkosh's return on equity of 17.29% beat The Shyft Group's return on equity of -1.12%.

Oshkosh has a consensus price target of $129.01, signalling upside risk potential of 34.71%. On the other hand The Shyft Group has an analysts' consensus of $15.50 which suggests that it could grow by 68.3%. Given that The Shyft Group has higher upside potential than Oshkosh, analysts believe The Shyft Group is more attractive than Oshkosh.

Oshkosh has a beta of 1.211, which suggesting that the stock is 21.053% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Shyft Group has a beta of 1.690, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 69.01%.

Oshkosh has a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.97%. The Shyft Group offers a yield of 2.17% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. Oshkosh pays 17.61% of its earnings as a dividend. The Shyft Group pays out -249.59% of its earnings as a dividend. Oshkosh's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Oshkosh quarterly revenues are $2.6B, which are larger than The Shyft Group quarterly revenues of $201.4M. Oshkosh's net income of $153.1M is higher than The Shyft Group's net income of -$3.4M. Notably, Oshkosh's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.25x while The Shyft Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Oshkosh is 0.59x versus 0.40x for The Shyft Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Xos has a net margin of 5.89% compared to Oshkosh's net margin of -66.57%. Oshkosh's return on equity of 17.29% beat Xos's return on equity of -80.19%.

Oshkosh has a consensus price target of $129.01, signalling upside risk potential of 34.71%. On the other hand Xos has an analysts' consensus of $10.00 which suggests that it could grow by 164.9%. Given that Xos has higher upside potential than Oshkosh, analysts believe Xos is more attractive than Oshkosh.

Oshkosh has a beta of 1.211, which suggesting that the stock is 21.053% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Xos has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Oshkosh has a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.97%. Xos offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Oshkosh pays 17.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Xos pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Oshkosh's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Oshkosh quarterly revenues are $2.6B, which are larger than Xos quarterly revenues of $15.8M. Oshkosh's net income of $153.1M is higher than Xos's net income of -$10.5M. Notably, Oshkosh's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.25x while Xos's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Oshkosh is 0.59x versus 0.42x for Xos. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.