XOS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Chicago Rivet & Machine has a net margin of -66.57% compared to Xos's net margin of -20.76%. Xos's return on equity of -80.19% beat Chicago Rivet & Machine's return on equity of -13.89%.

Xos has a consensus price target of $10.00, signalling upside risk potential of 164.9%. On the other hand Chicago Rivet & Machine has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Xos has higher upside potential than Chicago Rivet & Machine, analysts believe Xos is more attractive than Chicago Rivet & Machine.

Xos has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Chicago Rivet & Machine has a beta of 0.100, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 89.973%.

Xos has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Chicago Rivet & Machine offers a yield of 1.84% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share. Xos pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Chicago Rivet & Machine pays out -14.05% of its earnings as a dividend.

Xos quarterly revenues are $15.8M, which are larger than Chicago Rivet & Machine quarterly revenues of $7M. Xos's net income of -$10.5M is lower than Chicago Rivet & Machine's net income of -$1.4M. Notably, Xos's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Chicago Rivet & Machine's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Xos is 0.42x versus 0.46x for Chicago Rivet & Machine. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Oshkosh has a net margin of -66.57% compared to Xos's net margin of 5.89%. Xos's return on equity of -80.19% beat Oshkosh's return on equity of 17.29%.

Xos has a consensus price target of $10.00, signalling upside risk potential of 164.9%. On the other hand Oshkosh has an analysts' consensus of $129.01 which suggests that it could grow by 33.05%. Given that Xos has higher upside potential than Oshkosh, analysts believe Xos is more attractive than Oshkosh.

Xos has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Oshkosh has a beta of 1.211, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 21.053%.

Xos has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Oshkosh offers a yield of 1.95% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share. Xos pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Oshkosh pays out 17.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Oshkosh's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Xos quarterly revenues are $15.8M, which are smaller than Oshkosh quarterly revenues of $2.6B. Xos's net income of -$10.5M is lower than Oshkosh's net income of $153.1M. Notably, Xos's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Oshkosh's PE ratio is 9.37x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Xos is 0.42x versus 0.59x for Oshkosh. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

PACCAR has a net margin of -66.57% compared to Xos's net margin of 11.03%. Xos's return on equity of -80.19% beat PACCAR's return on equity of 24.02%.

Xos has a consensus price target of $10.00, signalling upside risk potential of 164.9%. On the other hand PACCAR has an analysts' consensus of $113.94 which suggests that it could grow by 13.5%. Given that Xos has higher upside potential than PACCAR, analysts believe Xos is more attractive than PACCAR.

Xos has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PACCAR has a beta of 0.913, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.71%.

Xos has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. PACCAR offers a yield of 1.22% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.33 per share. Xos pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. PACCAR pays out 54.99% of its earnings as a dividend. PACCAR's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Xos quarterly revenues are $15.8M, which are smaller than PACCAR quarterly revenues of $7.9B. Xos's net income of -$10.5M is lower than PACCAR's net income of $872M. Notably, Xos's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while PACCAR's PE ratio is 12.79x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Xos is 0.42x versus 1.58x for PACCAR. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The Shyft Group has a net margin of -66.57% compared to Xos's net margin of -1.69%. Xos's return on equity of -80.19% beat The Shyft Group's return on equity of -1.12%.

Xos has a consensus price target of $10.00, signalling upside risk potential of 164.9%. On the other hand The Shyft Group has an analysts' consensus of $15.50 which suggests that it could grow by 64.02%. Given that Xos has higher upside potential than The Shyft Group, analysts believe Xos is more attractive than The Shyft Group.

Xos has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Shyft Group has a beta of 1.690, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 69.01%.

Xos has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. The Shyft Group offers a yield of 2.12% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. Xos pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. The Shyft Group pays out -249.59% of its earnings as a dividend.

Xos quarterly revenues are $15.8M, which are smaller than The Shyft Group quarterly revenues of $201.4M. Xos's net income of -$10.5M is lower than The Shyft Group's net income of -$3.4M. Notably, Xos's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while The Shyft Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Xos is 0.42x versus 0.41x for The Shyft Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.