BLBD Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Greenbrier Companies has a net margin of 9.15% compared to Blue Bird's net margin of 6.31%. Blue Bird's return on equity of 82.17% beat Greenbrier Companies's return on equity of 11.9%.

Blue Bird has a consensus price target of $53.00, signalling upside risk potential of 54.7%. On the other hand Greenbrier Companies has an analysts' consensus of $68.50 which suggests that it could grow by 24.77%. Given that Blue Bird has higher upside potential than Greenbrier Companies, analysts believe Blue Bird is more attractive than Greenbrier Companies.

Blue Bird has a beta of 1.577, which suggesting that the stock is 57.707% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Greenbrier Companies has a beta of 1.628, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 62.752%.

Blue Bird has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Greenbrier Companies offers a yield of 2.19% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share. Blue Bird pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Greenbrier Companies pays out 23.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Greenbrier Companies's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Blue Bird quarterly revenues are $313.9M, which are smaller than Greenbrier Companies quarterly revenues of $875.9M. Blue Bird's net income of $28.7M is lower than Greenbrier Companies's net income of $55.3M. Notably, Blue Bird's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.61x while Greenbrier Companies's PE ratio is 9.60x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Blue Bird is 0.85x versus 0.49x for Greenbrier Companies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Oshkosh has a net margin of 9.15% compared to Blue Bird's net margin of 5.89%. Blue Bird's return on equity of 82.17% beat Oshkosh's return on equity of 17.29%.

Blue Bird has a consensus price target of $53.00, signalling upside risk potential of 54.7%. On the other hand Oshkosh has an analysts' consensus of $129.01 which suggests that it could grow by 34.71%. Given that Blue Bird has higher upside potential than Oshkosh, analysts believe Blue Bird is more attractive than Oshkosh.

Blue Bird has a beta of 1.577, which suggesting that the stock is 57.707% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Oshkosh has a beta of 1.211, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 21.053%.

Blue Bird has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Oshkosh offers a yield of 1.97% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share. Blue Bird pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Oshkosh pays out 17.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Oshkosh's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Blue Bird quarterly revenues are $313.9M, which are smaller than Oshkosh quarterly revenues of $2.6B. Blue Bird's net income of $28.7M is lower than Oshkosh's net income of $153.1M. Notably, Blue Bird's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.61x while Oshkosh's PE ratio is 9.25x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Blue Bird is 0.85x versus 0.59x for Oshkosh. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The Shyft Group has a net margin of 9.15% compared to Blue Bird's net margin of -1.69%. Blue Bird's return on equity of 82.17% beat The Shyft Group's return on equity of -1.12%.

Blue Bird has a consensus price target of $53.00, signalling upside risk potential of 54.7%. On the other hand The Shyft Group has an analysts' consensus of $15.50 which suggests that it could grow by 68.3%. Given that The Shyft Group has higher upside potential than Blue Bird, analysts believe The Shyft Group is more attractive than Blue Bird.

Blue Bird has a beta of 1.577, which suggesting that the stock is 57.707% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Shyft Group has a beta of 1.690, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 69.01%.

Blue Bird has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. The Shyft Group offers a yield of 2.17% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. Blue Bird pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. The Shyft Group pays out -249.59% of its earnings as a dividend.

Blue Bird quarterly revenues are $313.9M, which are larger than The Shyft Group quarterly revenues of $201.4M. Blue Bird's net income of $28.7M is higher than The Shyft Group's net income of -$3.4M. Notably, Blue Bird's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.61x while The Shyft Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Blue Bird is 0.85x versus 0.40x for The Shyft Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Wabash National has a net margin of 9.15% compared to Blue Bird's net margin of -0.25%. Blue Bird's return on equity of 82.17% beat Wabash National's return on equity of -69.69%.

Blue Bird has a consensus price target of $53.00, signalling upside risk potential of 54.7%. On the other hand Wabash National has an analysts' consensus of $18.50 which suggests that it could grow by 67.27%. Given that Wabash National has higher upside potential than Blue Bird, analysts believe Wabash National is more attractive than Blue Bird.

Blue Bird has a beta of 1.577, which suggesting that the stock is 57.707% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Wabash National has a beta of 1.641, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 64.094%.

Blue Bird has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Wabash National offers a yield of 3.62% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. Blue Bird pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Wabash National pays out -5.2% of its earnings as a dividend.

Blue Bird quarterly revenues are $313.9M, which are smaller than Wabash National quarterly revenues of $416.8M. Blue Bird's net income of $28.7M is higher than Wabash National's net income of -$1M. Notably, Blue Bird's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.61x while Wabash National's PE ratio is 5.97x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Blue Bird is 0.85x versus 0.25x for Wabash National. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.