RYDE Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Canaan has a net margin of -- compared to Ryde Group's net margin of -104.66%. Ryde Group's return on equity of -- beat Canaan's return on equity of -72.6%.

Ryde Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 782.36%. On the other hand Canaan has an analysts' consensus of $4.01 which suggests that it could grow by 495.18%. Given that Ryde Group has higher upside potential than Canaan, analysts believe Ryde Group is more attractive than Canaan.

Ryde Group has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Canaan has a beta of 3.476, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 247.598%.

Ryde Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Canaan offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Ryde Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Canaan pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Ryde Group quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Canaan quarterly revenues of $88.8M. Ryde Group's net income of -- is lower than Canaan's net income of -$92.9M. Notably, Ryde Group's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Canaan's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ryde Group is 0.83x versus 0.68x for Canaan. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Seagate Technology Holdings PLC has a net margin of -- compared to Ryde Group's net margin of 14.45%. Ryde Group's return on equity of -- beat Seagate Technology Holdings PLC's return on equity of --.

Ryde Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 782.36%. On the other hand Seagate Technology Holdings PLC has an analysts' consensus of $112.67 which suggests that it could grow by 60.61%. Given that Ryde Group has higher upside potential than Seagate Technology Holdings PLC, analysts believe Ryde Group is more attractive than Seagate Technology Holdings PLC.

Ryde Group has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Seagate Technology Holdings PLC has a beta of 1.212, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 21.198%.

Ryde Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Seagate Technology Holdings PLC offers a yield of 4.05% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.72 per share. Ryde Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Seagate Technology Holdings PLC pays out 174.63% of its earnings as a dividend.

Ryde Group quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Seagate Technology Holdings PLC quarterly revenues of $2.3B. Ryde Group's net income of -- is lower than Seagate Technology Holdings PLC's net income of $336M. Notably, Ryde Group's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Seagate Technology Holdings PLC's PE ratio is 12.82x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ryde Group is 0.83x versus 1.89x for Seagate Technology Holdings PLC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Trio-Tech International has a net margin of -- compared to Ryde Group's net margin of 5.88%. Ryde Group's return on equity of -- beat Trio-Tech International's return on equity of 1.82%.

Ryde Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 782.36%. On the other hand Trio-Tech International has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Ryde Group has higher upside potential than Trio-Tech International, analysts believe Ryde Group is more attractive than Trio-Tech International.

Ryde Group has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Trio-Tech International has a beta of 0.873, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.726%.

Ryde Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Trio-Tech International offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Ryde Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Trio-Tech International pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Ryde Group quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Trio-Tech International quarterly revenues of $8.6M. Ryde Group's net income of -- is lower than Trio-Tech International's net income of $507K. Notably, Ryde Group's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Trio-Tech International's PE ratio is 42.15x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ryde Group is 0.83x versus 0.62x for Trio-Tech International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

X3 Holdings has a net margin of -- compared to Ryde Group's net margin of --. Ryde Group's return on equity of -- beat X3 Holdings's return on equity of -45.67%.

Ryde Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 782.36%. On the other hand X3 Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 3696476.67%. Given that X3 Holdings has higher upside potential than Ryde Group, analysts believe X3 Holdings is more attractive than Ryde Group.

Ryde Group has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison X3 Holdings has a beta of 1.416, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 41.628%.

Ryde Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. X3 Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Ryde Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. X3 Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Ryde Group quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than X3 Holdings quarterly revenues of --. Ryde Group's net income of -- is lower than X3 Holdings's net income of --. Notably, Ryde Group's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while X3 Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ryde Group is 0.83x versus 0.61x for X3 Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.