STX Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

International Business Machines has a net margin of 14.45% compared to Seagate Technology Holdings PLC's net margin of 16.6%. Seagate Technology Holdings PLC's return on equity of -- beat International Business Machines's return on equity of 24.69%.

Seagate Technology Holdings PLC has a consensus price target of $112.67, signalling upside risk potential of 60.61%. On the other hand International Business Machines has an analysts' consensus of $254.04 which suggests that it could grow by 7.88%. Given that Seagate Technology Holdings PLC has higher upside potential than International Business Machines, analysts believe Seagate Technology Holdings PLC is more attractive than International Business Machines.

Seagate Technology Holdings PLC has a beta of 1.212, which suggesting that the stock is 21.198% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison International Business Machines has a beta of 0.672, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.796%.

Seagate Technology Holdings PLC has a quarterly dividend of $0.72 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.05%. International Business Machines offers a yield of 2.84% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.67 per share. Seagate Technology Holdings PLC pays 174.63% of its earnings as a dividend. International Business Machines pays out 102.06% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Seagate Technology Holdings PLC quarterly revenues are $2.3B, which are smaller than International Business Machines quarterly revenues of $17.6B. Seagate Technology Holdings PLC's net income of $336M is lower than International Business Machines's net income of $2.9B. Notably, Seagate Technology Holdings PLC's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.82x while International Business Machines's PE ratio is 36.74x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Seagate Technology Holdings PLC is 1.89x versus 3.50x for International Business Machines. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ryde Group has a net margin of 14.45% compared to Seagate Technology Holdings PLC's net margin of --. Seagate Technology Holdings PLC's return on equity of -- beat Ryde Group's return on equity of --.

Seagate Technology Holdings PLC has a consensus price target of $112.67, signalling upside risk potential of 60.61%. On the other hand Ryde Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 782.36%. Given that Ryde Group has higher upside potential than Seagate Technology Holdings PLC, analysts believe Ryde Group is more attractive than Seagate Technology Holdings PLC.

Seagate Technology Holdings PLC has a beta of 1.212, which suggesting that the stock is 21.198% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ryde Group has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Seagate Technology Holdings PLC has a quarterly dividend of $0.72 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.05%. Ryde Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Seagate Technology Holdings PLC pays 174.63% of its earnings as a dividend. Ryde Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Seagate Technology Holdings PLC quarterly revenues are $2.3B, which are larger than Ryde Group quarterly revenues of --. Seagate Technology Holdings PLC's net income of $336M is higher than Ryde Group's net income of --. Notably, Seagate Technology Holdings PLC's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.82x while Ryde Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Seagate Technology Holdings PLC is 1.89x versus 0.83x for Ryde Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Trio-Tech International has a net margin of 14.45% compared to Seagate Technology Holdings PLC's net margin of 5.88%. Seagate Technology Holdings PLC's return on equity of -- beat Trio-Tech International's return on equity of 1.82%.

Seagate Technology Holdings PLC has a consensus price target of $112.67, signalling upside risk potential of 60.61%. On the other hand Trio-Tech International has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Seagate Technology Holdings PLC has higher upside potential than Trio-Tech International, analysts believe Seagate Technology Holdings PLC is more attractive than Trio-Tech International.

Seagate Technology Holdings PLC has a beta of 1.212, which suggesting that the stock is 21.198% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Trio-Tech International has a beta of 0.873, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.726%.

Seagate Technology Holdings PLC has a quarterly dividend of $0.72 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.05%. Trio-Tech International offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Seagate Technology Holdings PLC pays 174.63% of its earnings as a dividend. Trio-Tech International pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Seagate Technology Holdings PLC quarterly revenues are $2.3B, which are larger than Trio-Tech International quarterly revenues of $8.6M. Seagate Technology Holdings PLC's net income of $336M is higher than Trio-Tech International's net income of $507K. Notably, Seagate Technology Holdings PLC's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.82x while Trio-Tech International's PE ratio is 42.15x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Seagate Technology Holdings PLC is 1.89x versus 0.62x for Trio-Tech International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Western Digital has a net margin of 14.45% compared to Seagate Technology Holdings PLC's net margin of 13.86%. Seagate Technology Holdings PLC's return on equity of -- beat Western Digital's return on equity of 11.02%.

Seagate Technology Holdings PLC has a consensus price target of $112.67, signalling upside risk potential of 60.61%. On the other hand Western Digital has an analysts' consensus of $68.42 which suggests that it could grow by 98.88%. Given that Western Digital has higher upside potential than Seagate Technology Holdings PLC, analysts believe Western Digital is more attractive than Seagate Technology Holdings PLC.

Seagate Technology Holdings PLC has a beta of 1.212, which suggesting that the stock is 21.198% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Western Digital has a beta of 1.450, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 44.958%.

Seagate Technology Holdings PLC has a quarterly dividend of $0.72 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.05%. Western Digital offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Seagate Technology Holdings PLC pays 174.63% of its earnings as a dividend. Western Digital pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Seagate Technology Holdings PLC quarterly revenues are $2.3B, which are smaller than Western Digital quarterly revenues of $4.3B. Seagate Technology Holdings PLC's net income of $336M is lower than Western Digital's net income of $594M. Notably, Seagate Technology Holdings PLC's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.82x while Western Digital's PE ratio is 8.19x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Seagate Technology Holdings PLC is 1.89x versus 0.76x for Western Digital. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.