XTKG Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Canaan has a net margin of -- compared to X3 Holdings's net margin of -104.66%. X3 Holdings's return on equity of -45.67% beat Canaan's return on equity of -72.6%.

X3 Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 3651760.01%. On the other hand Canaan has an analysts' consensus of $4.01 which suggests that it could grow by 495.18%. Given that X3 Holdings has higher upside potential than Canaan, analysts believe X3 Holdings is more attractive than Canaan.

X3 Holdings has a beta of 1.416, which suggesting that the stock is 41.628% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Canaan has a beta of 3.476, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 247.598%.

X3 Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Canaan offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. X3 Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Canaan pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

X3 Holdings quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Canaan quarterly revenues of $88.8M. X3 Holdings's net income of -- is lower than Canaan's net income of -$92.9M. Notably, X3 Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Canaan's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for X3 Holdings is 0.61x versus 0.68x for Canaan. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ryde Group has a net margin of -- compared to X3 Holdings's net margin of --. X3 Holdings's return on equity of -45.67% beat Ryde Group's return on equity of --.

X3 Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 3651760.01%. On the other hand Ryde Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 782.36%. Given that X3 Holdings has higher upside potential than Ryde Group, analysts believe X3 Holdings is more attractive than Ryde Group.

X3 Holdings has a beta of 1.416, which suggesting that the stock is 41.628% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ryde Group has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

X3 Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Ryde Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. X3 Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ryde Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

X3 Holdings quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Ryde Group quarterly revenues of --. X3 Holdings's net income of -- is lower than Ryde Group's net income of --. Notably, X3 Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Ryde Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for X3 Holdings is 0.61x versus 0.83x for Ryde Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Seagate Technology Holdings PLC has a net margin of -- compared to X3 Holdings's net margin of 14.45%. X3 Holdings's return on equity of -45.67% beat Seagate Technology Holdings PLC's return on equity of --.

X3 Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 3651760.01%. On the other hand Seagate Technology Holdings PLC has an analysts' consensus of $112.67 which suggests that it could grow by 60.61%. Given that X3 Holdings has higher upside potential than Seagate Technology Holdings PLC, analysts believe X3 Holdings is more attractive than Seagate Technology Holdings PLC.

X3 Holdings has a beta of 1.416, which suggesting that the stock is 41.628% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Seagate Technology Holdings PLC has a beta of 1.212, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 21.198%.

X3 Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Seagate Technology Holdings PLC offers a yield of 4.05% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.72 per share. X3 Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Seagate Technology Holdings PLC pays out 174.63% of its earnings as a dividend.

X3 Holdings quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Seagate Technology Holdings PLC quarterly revenues of $2.3B. X3 Holdings's net income of -- is lower than Seagate Technology Holdings PLC's net income of $336M. Notably, X3 Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Seagate Technology Holdings PLC's PE ratio is 12.82x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for X3 Holdings is 0.61x versus 1.89x for Seagate Technology Holdings PLC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Trio-Tech International has a net margin of -- compared to X3 Holdings's net margin of 5.88%. X3 Holdings's return on equity of -45.67% beat Trio-Tech International's return on equity of 1.82%.

X3 Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 3651760.01%. On the other hand Trio-Tech International has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that X3 Holdings has higher upside potential than Trio-Tech International, analysts believe X3 Holdings is more attractive than Trio-Tech International.

X3 Holdings has a beta of 1.416, which suggesting that the stock is 41.628% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Trio-Tech International has a beta of 0.873, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.726%.

X3 Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Trio-Tech International offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. X3 Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Trio-Tech International pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

X3 Holdings quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Trio-Tech International quarterly revenues of $8.6M. X3 Holdings's net income of -- is lower than Trio-Tech International's net income of $507K. Notably, X3 Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Trio-Tech International's PE ratio is 42.15x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for X3 Holdings is 0.61x versus 0.62x for Trio-Tech International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.