QMCO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Everspin Technologies has a net margin of -19.2% compared to Quantum's net margin of 9.17%. Quantum's return on equity of -- beat Everspin Technologies's return on equity of 1.36%.

Quantum has a consensus price target of $19.00, signalling upside risk potential of 80.61%. On the other hand Everspin Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $9.00 which suggests that it could grow by 104.55%. Given that Everspin Technologies has higher upside potential than Quantum, analysts believe Everspin Technologies is more attractive than Quantum.

Quantum has a beta of 2.815, which suggesting that the stock is 181.458% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Everspin Technologies has a beta of 0.618, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 38.236%.

Quantum has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Everspin Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Quantum pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Everspin Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Quantum quarterly revenues are $70.5M, which are larger than Everspin Technologies quarterly revenues of $13.2M. Quantum's net income of -$13.5M is lower than Everspin Technologies's net income of $1.2M. Notably, Quantum's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Everspin Technologies's PE ratio is 146.67x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Quantum is 0.18x versus 1.94x for Everspin Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NetApp has a net margin of -19.2% compared to Quantum's net margin of 18.22%. Quantum's return on equity of -- beat NetApp's return on equity of 114.71%.

Quantum has a consensus price target of $19.00, signalling upside risk potential of 80.61%. On the other hand NetApp has an analysts' consensus of $118.65 which suggests that it could grow by 55.83%. Given that Quantum has higher upside potential than NetApp, analysts believe Quantum is more attractive than NetApp.

Quantum has a beta of 2.815, which suggesting that the stock is 181.458% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NetApp has a beta of 1.311, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 31.087%.

Quantum has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. NetApp offers a yield of 2.73% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.52 per share. Quantum pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. NetApp pays out 42.19% of its earnings as a dividend. NetApp's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Quantum quarterly revenues are $70.5M, which are smaller than NetApp quarterly revenues of $1.6B. Quantum's net income of -$13.5M is lower than NetApp's net income of $299M. Notably, Quantum's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while NetApp's PE ratio is 14.10x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Quantum is 0.18x versus 2.47x for NetApp. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Pure Storage has a net margin of -19.2% compared to Quantum's net margin of 4.82%. Quantum's return on equity of -- beat Pure Storage's return on equity of 7.83%.

Quantum has a consensus price target of $19.00, signalling upside risk potential of 80.61%. On the other hand Pure Storage has an analysts' consensus of $70.06 which suggests that it could grow by 81.07%. Given that Pure Storage has higher upside potential than Quantum, analysts believe Pure Storage is more attractive than Quantum.

Quantum has a beta of 2.815, which suggesting that the stock is 181.458% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Pure Storage has a beta of 1.076, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.593%.

Quantum has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Pure Storage offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Quantum pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Pure Storage pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Quantum quarterly revenues are $70.5M, which are smaller than Pure Storage quarterly revenues of $879.8M. Quantum's net income of -$13.5M is lower than Pure Storage's net income of $42.4M. Notably, Quantum's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Pure Storage's PE ratio is 128.97x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Quantum is 0.18x versus 4.13x for Pure Storage. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Western Digital has a net margin of -19.2% compared to Quantum's net margin of 13.86%. Quantum's return on equity of -- beat Western Digital's return on equity of 11.02%.

Quantum has a consensus price target of $19.00, signalling upside risk potential of 80.61%. On the other hand Western Digital has an analysts' consensus of $73.62 which suggests that it could grow by 133.19%. Given that Western Digital has higher upside potential than Quantum, analysts believe Western Digital is more attractive than Quantum.

Quantum has a beta of 2.815, which suggesting that the stock is 181.458% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Western Digital has a beta of 1.450, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 44.958%.

Quantum has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Western Digital offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Quantum pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Western Digital pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Quantum quarterly revenues are $70.5M, which are smaller than Western Digital quarterly revenues of $4.3B. Quantum's net income of -$13.5M is lower than Western Digital's net income of $594M. Notably, Quantum's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Western Digital's PE ratio is 7.52x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Quantum is 0.18x versus 0.70x for Western Digital. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.