LOAN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

FRP Holdings has a net margin of 70.33% compared to Manhattan Bridge Capital's net margin of 15.94%. Manhattan Bridge Capital's return on equity of 12.96% beat FRP Holdings's return on equity of 1.4%.

Manhattan Bridge Capital has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 32.08%. On the other hand FRP Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Manhattan Bridge Capital has higher upside potential than FRP Holdings, analysts believe Manhattan Bridge Capital is more attractive than FRP Holdings.

Manhattan Bridge Capital has a beta of 0.260, which suggesting that the stock is 74.032% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison FRP Holdings has a beta of 0.533, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 46.691%.

Manhattan Bridge Capital has a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share corresponding to a yield of 8.68%. FRP Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Manhattan Bridge Capital pays 93.61% of its earnings as a dividend. FRP Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Manhattan Bridge Capital's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Manhattan Bridge Capital quarterly revenues are $1.9M, which are smaller than FRP Holdings quarterly revenues of $10.5M. Manhattan Bridge Capital's net income of $1.3M is lower than FRP Holdings's net income of $1.7M. Notably, Manhattan Bridge Capital's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.82x while FRP Holdings's PE ratio is 79.01x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Manhattan Bridge Capital is 8.23x versus 12.19x for FRP Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Gaming and Leisure Properties has a net margin of 70.33% compared to Manhattan Bridge Capital's net margin of 55.75%. Manhattan Bridge Capital's return on equity of 12.96% beat Gaming and Leisure Properties's return on equity of 17.22%.

Manhattan Bridge Capital has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 32.08%. On the other hand Gaming and Leisure Properties has an analysts' consensus of $55.50 which suggests that it could grow by 13.13%. Given that Manhattan Bridge Capital has higher upside potential than Gaming and Leisure Properties, analysts believe Manhattan Bridge Capital is more attractive than Gaming and Leisure Properties.

Manhattan Bridge Capital has a beta of 0.260, which suggesting that the stock is 74.032% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Gaming and Leisure Properties has a beta of 0.743, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.703%.

Manhattan Bridge Capital has a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share corresponding to a yield of 8.68%. Gaming and Leisure Properties offers a yield of 6.2% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.76 per share. Manhattan Bridge Capital pays 93.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Gaming and Leisure Properties pays out 105.88% of its earnings as a dividend. Manhattan Bridge Capital's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Gaming and Leisure Properties's is not.

Manhattan Bridge Capital quarterly revenues are $1.9M, which are smaller than Gaming and Leisure Properties quarterly revenues of $389.6M. Manhattan Bridge Capital's net income of $1.3M is lower than Gaming and Leisure Properties's net income of $217.2M. Notably, Manhattan Bridge Capital's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.82x while Gaming and Leisure Properties's PE ratio is 17.09x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Manhattan Bridge Capital is 8.23x versus 8.76x for Gaming and Leisure Properties. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SBA Communications has a net margin of 70.33% compared to Manhattan Bridge Capital's net margin of 25.03%. Manhattan Bridge Capital's return on equity of 12.96% beat SBA Communications's return on equity of --.

Manhattan Bridge Capital has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 32.08%. On the other hand SBA Communications has an analysts' consensus of $249.41 which suggests that it could grow by 10.52%. Given that Manhattan Bridge Capital has higher upside potential than SBA Communications, analysts believe Manhattan Bridge Capital is more attractive than SBA Communications.

Manhattan Bridge Capital has a beta of 0.260, which suggesting that the stock is 74.032% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SBA Communications has a beta of 0.831, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 16.905%.

Manhattan Bridge Capital has a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share corresponding to a yield of 8.68%. SBA Communications offers a yield of 1.8% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.11 per share. Manhattan Bridge Capital pays 93.61% of its earnings as a dividend. SBA Communications pays out 56.59% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Manhattan Bridge Capital quarterly revenues are $1.9M, which are smaller than SBA Communications quarterly revenues of $693.7M. Manhattan Bridge Capital's net income of $1.3M is lower than SBA Communications's net income of $173.6M. Notably, Manhattan Bridge Capital's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.82x while SBA Communications's PE ratio is 32.52x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Manhattan Bridge Capital is 8.23x versus 9.10x for SBA Communications. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Uniti Group has a net margin of 70.33% compared to Manhattan Bridge Capital's net margin of 7.35%. Manhattan Bridge Capital's return on equity of 12.96% beat Uniti Group's return on equity of --.

Manhattan Bridge Capital has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 32.08%. On the other hand Uniti Group has an analysts' consensus of $5.92 which suggests that it could grow by 29.75%. Given that Manhattan Bridge Capital has higher upside potential than Uniti Group, analysts believe Manhattan Bridge Capital is more attractive than Uniti Group.

Manhattan Bridge Capital has a beta of 0.260, which suggesting that the stock is 74.032% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Uniti Group has a beta of 1.575, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 57.497%.

Manhattan Bridge Capital has a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share corresponding to a yield of 8.68%. Uniti Group offers a yield of 13.16% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share. Manhattan Bridge Capital pays 93.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Uniti Group pays out 116.11% of its earnings as a dividend. Manhattan Bridge Capital's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Uniti Group's is not.

Manhattan Bridge Capital quarterly revenues are $1.9M, which are smaller than Uniti Group quarterly revenues of $293.3M. Manhattan Bridge Capital's net income of $1.3M is lower than Uniti Group's net income of $21.6M. Notably, Manhattan Bridge Capital's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.82x while Uniti Group's PE ratio is 12.32x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Manhattan Bridge Capital is 8.23x versus 0.98x for Uniti Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.