GLPI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

FRP Holdings has a net margin of 55.75% compared to Gaming and Leisure Properties's net margin of 15.94%. Gaming and Leisure Properties's return on equity of 17.22% beat FRP Holdings's return on equity of 1.4%.

Gaming and Leisure Properties has a consensus price target of $55.50, signalling upside risk potential of 13.13%. On the other hand FRP Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Gaming and Leisure Properties has higher upside potential than FRP Holdings, analysts believe Gaming and Leisure Properties is more attractive than FRP Holdings.

Gaming and Leisure Properties has a beta of 0.743, which suggesting that the stock is 25.703% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison FRP Holdings has a beta of 0.533, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 46.691%.

Gaming and Leisure Properties has a quarterly dividend of $0.76 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.2%. FRP Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Gaming and Leisure Properties pays 105.88% of its earnings as a dividend. FRP Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Gaming and Leisure Properties quarterly revenues are $389.6M, which are larger than FRP Holdings quarterly revenues of $10.5M. Gaming and Leisure Properties's net income of $217.2M is higher than FRP Holdings's net income of $1.7M. Notably, Gaming and Leisure Properties's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.09x while FRP Holdings's PE ratio is 79.01x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Gaming and Leisure Properties is 8.76x versus 12.19x for FRP Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Manhattan Bridge Capital has a net margin of 55.75% compared to Gaming and Leisure Properties's net margin of 70.33%. Gaming and Leisure Properties's return on equity of 17.22% beat Manhattan Bridge Capital's return on equity of 12.96%.

Gaming and Leisure Properties has a consensus price target of $55.50, signalling upside risk potential of 13.13%. On the other hand Manhattan Bridge Capital has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 32.08%. Given that Manhattan Bridge Capital has higher upside potential than Gaming and Leisure Properties, analysts believe Manhattan Bridge Capital is more attractive than Gaming and Leisure Properties.

Gaming and Leisure Properties has a beta of 0.743, which suggesting that the stock is 25.703% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Manhattan Bridge Capital has a beta of 0.260, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 74.032%.

Gaming and Leisure Properties has a quarterly dividend of $0.76 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.2%. Manhattan Bridge Capital offers a yield of 8.68% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share. Gaming and Leisure Properties pays 105.88% of its earnings as a dividend. Manhattan Bridge Capital pays out 93.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Manhattan Bridge Capital's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Gaming and Leisure Properties's is not.

Gaming and Leisure Properties quarterly revenues are $389.6M, which are larger than Manhattan Bridge Capital quarterly revenues of $1.9M. Gaming and Leisure Properties's net income of $217.2M is higher than Manhattan Bridge Capital's net income of $1.3M. Notably, Gaming and Leisure Properties's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.09x while Manhattan Bridge Capital's PE ratio is 10.82x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Gaming and Leisure Properties is 8.76x versus 8.23x for Manhattan Bridge Capital. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SBA Communications has a net margin of 55.75% compared to Gaming and Leisure Properties's net margin of 25.03%. Gaming and Leisure Properties's return on equity of 17.22% beat SBA Communications's return on equity of --.

Gaming and Leisure Properties has a consensus price target of $55.50, signalling upside risk potential of 13.13%. On the other hand SBA Communications has an analysts' consensus of $249.41 which suggests that it could grow by 10.52%. Given that Gaming and Leisure Properties has higher upside potential than SBA Communications, analysts believe Gaming and Leisure Properties is more attractive than SBA Communications.

Gaming and Leisure Properties has a beta of 0.743, which suggesting that the stock is 25.703% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SBA Communications has a beta of 0.831, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 16.905%.

Gaming and Leisure Properties has a quarterly dividend of $0.76 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.2%. SBA Communications offers a yield of 1.8% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.11 per share. Gaming and Leisure Properties pays 105.88% of its earnings as a dividend. SBA Communications pays out 56.59% of its earnings as a dividend. SBA Communications's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Gaming and Leisure Properties's is not.

Gaming and Leisure Properties quarterly revenues are $389.6M, which are smaller than SBA Communications quarterly revenues of $693.7M. Gaming and Leisure Properties's net income of $217.2M is higher than SBA Communications's net income of $173.6M. Notably, Gaming and Leisure Properties's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.09x while SBA Communications's PE ratio is 32.52x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Gaming and Leisure Properties is 8.76x versus 9.10x for SBA Communications. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Uniti Group has a net margin of 55.75% compared to Gaming and Leisure Properties's net margin of 7.35%. Gaming and Leisure Properties's return on equity of 17.22% beat Uniti Group's return on equity of --.

Gaming and Leisure Properties has a consensus price target of $55.50, signalling upside risk potential of 13.13%. On the other hand Uniti Group has an analysts' consensus of $5.92 which suggests that it could grow by 29.75%. Given that Uniti Group has higher upside potential than Gaming and Leisure Properties, analysts believe Uniti Group is more attractive than Gaming and Leisure Properties.

Gaming and Leisure Properties has a beta of 0.743, which suggesting that the stock is 25.703% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Uniti Group has a beta of 1.575, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 57.497%.

Gaming and Leisure Properties has a quarterly dividend of $0.76 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.2%. Uniti Group offers a yield of 13.16% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share. Gaming and Leisure Properties pays 105.88% of its earnings as a dividend. Uniti Group pays out 116.11% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Gaming and Leisure Properties quarterly revenues are $389.6M, which are larger than Uniti Group quarterly revenues of $293.3M. Gaming and Leisure Properties's net income of $217.2M is higher than Uniti Group's net income of $21.6M. Notably, Gaming and Leisure Properties's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.09x while Uniti Group's PE ratio is 12.32x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Gaming and Leisure Properties is 8.76x versus 0.98x for Uniti Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.