FRPH Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Gaming and Leisure Properties has a net margin of 15.94% compared to FRP Holdings's net margin of 55.75%. FRP Holdings's return on equity of 1.4% beat Gaming and Leisure Properties's return on equity of 17.22%.

FRP Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Gaming and Leisure Properties has an analysts' consensus of $55.50 which suggests that it could grow by 16.4%. Given that Gaming and Leisure Properties has higher upside potential than FRP Holdings, analysts believe Gaming and Leisure Properties is more attractive than FRP Holdings.

FRP Holdings has a beta of 0.533, which suggesting that the stock is 46.691% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Gaming and Leisure Properties has a beta of 0.743, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.703%.

FRP Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Gaming and Leisure Properties offers a yield of 6.38% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.76 per share. FRP Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Gaming and Leisure Properties pays out 105.88% of its earnings as a dividend.

FRP Holdings quarterly revenues are $10.5M, which are smaller than Gaming and Leisure Properties quarterly revenues of $389.6M. FRP Holdings's net income of $1.7M is lower than Gaming and Leisure Properties's net income of $217.2M. Notably, FRP Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 78.29x while Gaming and Leisure Properties's PE ratio is 16.61x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for FRP Holdings is 12.08x versus 8.52x for Gaming and Leisure Properties. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Manhattan Bridge Capital has a net margin of 15.94% compared to FRP Holdings's net margin of 70.33%. FRP Holdings's return on equity of 1.4% beat Manhattan Bridge Capital's return on equity of 12.96%.

FRP Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Manhattan Bridge Capital has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 44.33%. Given that Manhattan Bridge Capital has higher upside potential than FRP Holdings, analysts believe Manhattan Bridge Capital is more attractive than FRP Holdings.

FRP Holdings has a beta of 0.533, which suggesting that the stock is 46.691% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Manhattan Bridge Capital has a beta of 0.260, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 74.032%.

FRP Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Manhattan Bridge Capital offers a yield of 9.49% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share. FRP Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Manhattan Bridge Capital pays out 93.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Manhattan Bridge Capital's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

FRP Holdings quarterly revenues are $10.5M, which are larger than Manhattan Bridge Capital quarterly revenues of $1.9M. FRP Holdings's net income of $1.7M is higher than Manhattan Bridge Capital's net income of $1.3M. Notably, FRP Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 78.29x while Manhattan Bridge Capital's PE ratio is 9.90x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for FRP Holdings is 12.08x versus 7.53x for Manhattan Bridge Capital. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SBA Communications has a net margin of 15.94% compared to FRP Holdings's net margin of 25.03%. FRP Holdings's return on equity of 1.4% beat SBA Communications's return on equity of --.

FRP Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand SBA Communications has an analysts' consensus of $249.41 which suggests that it could grow by 13.79%. Given that SBA Communications has higher upside potential than FRP Holdings, analysts believe SBA Communications is more attractive than FRP Holdings.

FRP Holdings has a beta of 0.533, which suggesting that the stock is 46.691% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SBA Communications has a beta of 0.831, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 16.905%.

FRP Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. SBA Communications offers a yield of 1.85% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.11 per share. FRP Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. SBA Communications pays out 56.59% of its earnings as a dividend. SBA Communications's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

FRP Holdings quarterly revenues are $10.5M, which are smaller than SBA Communications quarterly revenues of $693.7M. FRP Holdings's net income of $1.7M is lower than SBA Communications's net income of $173.6M. Notably, FRP Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 78.29x while SBA Communications's PE ratio is 31.58x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for FRP Holdings is 12.08x versus 8.84x for SBA Communications. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Uniti Group has a net margin of 15.94% compared to FRP Holdings's net margin of 7.35%. FRP Holdings's return on equity of 1.4% beat Uniti Group's return on equity of --.

FRP Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Uniti Group has an analysts' consensus of $5.92 which suggests that it could grow by 37.6%. Given that Uniti Group has higher upside potential than FRP Holdings, analysts believe Uniti Group is more attractive than FRP Holdings.

FRP Holdings has a beta of 0.533, which suggesting that the stock is 46.691% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Uniti Group has a beta of 1.575, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 57.497%.

FRP Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Uniti Group offers a yield of 13.95% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share. FRP Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Uniti Group pays out 116.11% of its earnings as a dividend.

FRP Holdings quarterly revenues are $10.5M, which are smaller than Uniti Group quarterly revenues of $293.3M. FRP Holdings's net income of $1.7M is lower than Uniti Group's net income of $21.6M. Notably, FRP Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 78.29x while Uniti Group's PE ratio is 11.62x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for FRP Holdings is 12.08x versus 0.93x for Uniti Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.