KLXE Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Baker Hughes has a net margin of -8.82% compared to KLX Energy Services Holdings's net margin of 6.26%. KLX Energy Services Holdings's return on equity of -460.87% beat Baker Hughes's return on equity of 17.87%.

KLX Energy Services Holdings has a consensus price target of $8.00, signalling upside risk potential of 286.47%. On the other hand Baker Hughes has an analysts' consensus of $47.47 which suggests that it could grow by 30.54%. Given that KLX Energy Services Holdings has higher upside potential than Baker Hughes, analysts believe KLX Energy Services Holdings is more attractive than Baker Hughes.

KLX Energy Services Holdings has a beta of 1.589, which suggesting that the stock is 58.925% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Baker Hughes has a beta of 1.083, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.262%.

KLX Energy Services Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Baker Hughes offers a yield of 2.36% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share. KLX Energy Services Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Baker Hughes pays out 28.06% of its earnings as a dividend. Baker Hughes's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

KLX Energy Services Holdings quarterly revenues are $165.5M, which are smaller than Baker Hughes quarterly revenues of $6.4B. KLX Energy Services Holdings's net income of -$14.6M is lower than Baker Hughes's net income of $402M. Notably, KLX Energy Services Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Baker Hughes's PE ratio is 12.44x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for KLX Energy Services Holdings is 0.05x versus 1.31x for Baker Hughes. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Halliburton has a net margin of -8.82% compared to KLX Energy Services Holdings's net margin of 3.77%. KLX Energy Services Holdings's return on equity of -460.87% beat Halliburton's return on equity of 20.56%.

KLX Energy Services Holdings has a consensus price target of $8.00, signalling upside risk potential of 286.47%. On the other hand Halliburton has an analysts' consensus of $30.04 which suggests that it could grow by 44.1%. Given that KLX Energy Services Holdings has higher upside potential than Halliburton, analysts believe KLX Energy Services Holdings is more attractive than Halliburton.

KLX Energy Services Holdings has a beta of 1.589, which suggesting that the stock is 58.925% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Halliburton has a beta of 1.453, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 45.349%.

KLX Energy Services Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Halliburton offers a yield of 3.26% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share. KLX Energy Services Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Halliburton pays out 23.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Halliburton's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

KLX Energy Services Holdings quarterly revenues are $165.5M, which are smaller than Halliburton quarterly revenues of $5.4B. KLX Energy Services Holdings's net income of -$14.6M is lower than Halliburton's net income of $204M. Notably, KLX Energy Services Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Halliburton's PE ratio is 8.72x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for KLX Energy Services Holdings is 0.05x versus 0.81x for Halliburton. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NextDecade has a net margin of -8.82% compared to KLX Energy Services Holdings's net margin of --. KLX Energy Services Holdings's return on equity of -460.87% beat NextDecade's return on equity of --.

KLX Energy Services Holdings has a consensus price target of $8.00, signalling upside risk potential of 286.47%. On the other hand NextDecade has an analysts' consensus of $11.33 which suggests that it could grow by 53.78%. Given that KLX Energy Services Holdings has higher upside potential than NextDecade, analysts believe KLX Energy Services Holdings is more attractive than NextDecade.

KLX Energy Services Holdings has a beta of 1.589, which suggesting that the stock is 58.925% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NextDecade has a beta of 0.800, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 20.047%.

KLX Energy Services Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. NextDecade offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. KLX Energy Services Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. NextDecade pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

KLX Energy Services Holdings quarterly revenues are $165.5M, which are larger than NextDecade quarterly revenues of --. KLX Energy Services Holdings's net income of -$14.6M is lower than NextDecade's net income of $65.7M. Notably, KLX Energy Services Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while NextDecade's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for KLX Energy Services Holdings is 0.05x versus -- for NextDecade. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Schlumberger has a net margin of -8.82% compared to KLX Energy Services Holdings's net margin of 11.8%. KLX Energy Services Holdings's return on equity of -460.87% beat Schlumberger's return on equity of 20.16%.

KLX Energy Services Holdings has a consensus price target of $8.00, signalling upside risk potential of 286.47%. On the other hand Schlumberger has an analysts' consensus of $49.39 which suggests that it could grow by 43.48%. Given that KLX Energy Services Holdings has higher upside potential than Schlumberger, analysts believe KLX Energy Services Holdings is more attractive than Schlumberger.

KLX Energy Services Holdings has a beta of 1.589, which suggesting that the stock is 58.925% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Schlumberger has a beta of 1.108, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.846%.

KLX Energy Services Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Schlumberger offers a yield of 3.22% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share. KLX Energy Services Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Schlumberger pays out 34.37% of its earnings as a dividend. Schlumberger's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

KLX Energy Services Holdings quarterly revenues are $165.5M, which are smaller than Schlumberger quarterly revenues of $9.3B. KLX Energy Services Holdings's net income of -$14.6M is lower than Schlumberger's net income of $1.1B. Notably, KLX Energy Services Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Schlumberger's PE ratio is 11.10x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for KLX Energy Services Holdings is 0.05x versus 1.37x for Schlumberger. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.