HAL Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Kosmos Energy has a net margin of 10.02% compared to Halliburton's net margin of 11.03%. Halliburton's return on equity of 26.15% beat Kosmos Energy's return on equity of 20.04%.

Halliburton has a consensus price target of $37.06, signalling upside risk potential of 33.55%. On the other hand Kosmos Energy has an analysts' consensus of $6.58 which suggests that it could grow by 68.59%. Given that Kosmos Energy has higher upside potential than Halliburton, analysts believe Kosmos Energy is more attractive than Halliburton.

Halliburton has a beta of 1.912, which suggesting that the stock is 91.19% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kosmos Energy has a beta of 2.442, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 144.17%.

Halliburton has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.45%. Kosmos Energy offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Halliburton pays 21.84% of its earnings as a dividend. Kosmos Energy pays out 0.08% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Halliburton quarterly revenues are $5.7B, which are larger than Kosmos Energy quarterly revenues of $407.8M. Halliburton's net income of $571M is higher than Kosmos Energy's net income of $45M. Notably, Halliburton's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.67x while Kosmos Energy's PE ratio is 8.86x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Halliburton is 1.07x versus 1.05x for Kosmos Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Schlumberger has a net margin of 10.02% compared to Halliburton's net margin of 12.95%. Halliburton's return on equity of 26.15% beat Schlumberger's return on equity of 20.73%.

Halliburton has a consensus price target of $37.06, signalling upside risk potential of 33.55%. On the other hand Schlumberger has an analysts' consensus of $55.49 which suggests that it could grow by 40.96%. Given that Schlumberger has higher upside potential than Halliburton, analysts believe Schlumberger is more attractive than Halliburton.

Halliburton has a beta of 1.912, which suggesting that the stock is 91.19% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Schlumberger has a beta of 1.524, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 52.415%.

Halliburton has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.45%. Schlumberger offers a yield of 2.79% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share. Halliburton pays 21.84% of its earnings as a dividend. Schlumberger pays out 31.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Halliburton quarterly revenues are $5.7B, which are smaller than Schlumberger quarterly revenues of $9.2B. Halliburton's net income of $571M is lower than Schlumberger's net income of $1.2B. Notably, Halliburton's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.67x while Schlumberger's PE ratio is 12.66x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Halliburton is 1.07x versus 1.58x for Schlumberger. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Targa Resources has a net margin of 10.02% compared to Halliburton's net margin of 10.06%. Halliburton's return on equity of 26.15% beat Targa Resources's return on equity of 28.18%.

Halliburton has a consensus price target of $37.06, signalling upside risk potential of 33.55%. On the other hand Targa Resources has an analysts' consensus of $194.75 which suggests that it could grow by 5.64%. Given that Halliburton has higher upside potential than Targa Resources, analysts believe Halliburton is more attractive than Targa Resources.

Halliburton has a beta of 1.912, which suggesting that the stock is 91.19% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Targa Resources has a beta of 2.299, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 129.914%.

Halliburton has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.45%. Targa Resources offers a yield of 1.46% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.75 per share. Halliburton pays 21.84% of its earnings as a dividend. Targa Resources pays out 31.75% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Halliburton quarterly revenues are $5.7B, which are larger than Targa Resources quarterly revenues of $3.9B. Halliburton's net income of $571M is higher than Targa Resources's net income of $387.4M. Notably, Halliburton's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.67x while Targa Resources's PE ratio is 33.96x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Halliburton is 1.07x versus 2.58x for Targa Resources. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Weatherford International PLC has a net margin of 10.02% compared to Halliburton's net margin of 11.14%. Halliburton's return on equity of 26.15% beat Weatherford International PLC's return on equity of 49.62%.

Halliburton has a consensus price target of $37.06, signalling upside risk potential of 33.55%. On the other hand Weatherford International PLC has an analysts' consensus of $107.89 which suggests that it could grow by 44.24%. Given that Weatherford International PLC has higher upside potential than Halliburton, analysts believe Weatherford International PLC is more attractive than Halliburton.

Halliburton has a beta of 1.912, which suggesting that the stock is 91.19% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Weatherford International PLC has a beta of 1.763, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 76.271%.

Halliburton has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.45%. Weatherford International PLC offers a yield of 0.67% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. Halliburton pays 21.84% of its earnings as a dividend. Weatherford International PLC pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Halliburton's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Halliburton quarterly revenues are $5.7B, which are larger than Weatherford International PLC quarterly revenues of $1.4B. Halliburton's net income of $571M is higher than Weatherford International PLC's net income of $157M. Notably, Halliburton's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.67x while Weatherford International PLC's PE ratio is 10.51x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Halliburton is 1.07x versus 1.02x for Weatherford International PLC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.