BKR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Core Laboratories has a net margin of 11.09% compared to Baker Hughes's net margin of 8.74%. Baker Hughes's return on equity of 14.26% beat Core Laboratories's return on equity of 10.93%.

Baker Hughes has a consensus price target of $46.75, signalling upside risk potential of 7.73%. On the other hand Core Laboratories has an analysts' consensus of $20.71 which suggests that it could grow by 4.45%. Given that Baker Hughes has higher upside potential than Core Laboratories, analysts believe Baker Hughes is more attractive than Core Laboratories.

Baker Hughes has a beta of 1.396, which suggesting that the stock is 39.619% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Core Laboratories has a beta of 2.388, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 138.847%.

Baker Hughes has a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.94%. Core Laboratories offers a yield of 0.22% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Baker Hughes pays 40.45% of its earnings as a dividend. Core Laboratories pays out 5.09% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Baker Hughes quarterly revenues are $6.9B, which are larger than Core Laboratories quarterly revenues of $134.4M. Baker Hughes's net income of $766M is higher than Core Laboratories's net income of $11.7M. Notably, Baker Hughes's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.46x while Core Laboratories's PE ratio is 33.65x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Baker Hughes is 1.60x versus 1.69x for Core Laboratories. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

EOG Resources has a net margin of 11.09% compared to Baker Hughes's net margin of 28.53%. Baker Hughes's return on equity of 14.26% beat EOG Resources's return on equity of 24.93%.

Baker Hughes has a consensus price target of $46.75, signalling upside risk potential of 7.73%. On the other hand EOG Resources has an analysts' consensus of $145.13 which suggests that it could grow by 13.78%. Given that EOG Resources has higher upside potential than Baker Hughes, analysts believe EOG Resources is more attractive than Baker Hughes.

Baker Hughes has a beta of 1.396, which suggesting that the stock is 39.619% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison EOG Resources has a beta of 1.291, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.116%.

Baker Hughes has a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.94%. EOG Resources offers a yield of 2.85% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.91 per share. Baker Hughes pays 40.45% of its earnings as a dividend. EOG Resources pays out 44.59% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Baker Hughes quarterly revenues are $6.9B, which are larger than EOG Resources quarterly revenues of $5.9B. Baker Hughes's net income of $766M is lower than EOG Resources's net income of $1.7B. Notably, Baker Hughes's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.46x while EOG Resources's PE ratio is 10.27x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Baker Hughes is 1.60x versus 3.09x for EOG Resources. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Halliburton has a net margin of 11.09% compared to Baker Hughes's net margin of 10.02%. Baker Hughes's return on equity of 14.26% beat Halliburton's return on equity of 26.15%.

Baker Hughes has a consensus price target of $46.75, signalling upside risk potential of 7.73%. On the other hand Halliburton has an analysts' consensus of $37.06 which suggests that it could grow by 33.55%. Given that Halliburton has higher upside potential than Baker Hughes, analysts believe Halliburton is more attractive than Baker Hughes.

Baker Hughes has a beta of 1.396, which suggesting that the stock is 39.619% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Halliburton has a beta of 1.912, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 91.19%.

Baker Hughes has a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.94%. Halliburton offers a yield of 2.45% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share. Baker Hughes pays 40.45% of its earnings as a dividend. Halliburton pays out 21.84% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Baker Hughes quarterly revenues are $6.9B, which are larger than Halliburton quarterly revenues of $5.7B. Baker Hughes's net income of $766M is higher than Halliburton's net income of $571M. Notably, Baker Hughes's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.46x while Halliburton's PE ratio is 9.67x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Baker Hughes is 1.60x versus 1.07x for Halliburton. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

MPLX LP has a net margin of 11.09% compared to Baker Hughes's net margin of 37.36%. Baker Hughes's return on equity of 14.26% beat MPLX LP's return on equity of 31.81%.

Baker Hughes has a consensus price target of $46.75, signalling upside risk potential of 7.73%. On the other hand MPLX LP has an analysts' consensus of $51.25 which suggests that it could grow by 7.04%. Given that Baker Hughes has higher upside potential than MPLX LP, analysts believe Baker Hughes is more attractive than MPLX LP.

Baker Hughes has a beta of 1.396, which suggesting that the stock is 39.619% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MPLX LP has a beta of 1.435, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 43.455%.

Baker Hughes has a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.94%. MPLX LP offers a yield of 7.32% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.96 per share. Baker Hughes pays 40.45% of its earnings as a dividend. MPLX LP pays out 83.91% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Baker Hughes quarterly revenues are $6.9B, which are larger than MPLX LP quarterly revenues of $2.8B. Baker Hughes's net income of $766M is lower than MPLX LP's net income of $1B. Notably, Baker Hughes's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.46x while MPLX LP's PE ratio is 11.29x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Baker Hughes is 1.60x versus 4.52x for MPLX LP. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.