VZ Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Alphabet has a net margin of 9.92% compared to Verizon Communications's net margin of 29.8%. Verizon Communications's return on equity of 10.12% beat Alphabet's return on equity of 32.19%.

Verizon Communications has a consensus price target of $47.50, signalling upside risk potential of 22.04%. On the other hand Alphabet has an analysts' consensus of $211.35 which suggests that it could grow by 8.12%. Given that Verizon Communications has higher upside potential than Alphabet, analysts believe Verizon Communications is more attractive than Alphabet.

Verizon Communications has a beta of 0.456, which suggesting that the stock is 54.357% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Alphabet has a beta of 0.980, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.965%.

Verizon Communications has a quarterly dividend of $0.68 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.87%. Alphabet offers a yield of 0.31% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share. Verizon Communications pays 94.93% of its earnings as a dividend. Alphabet pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Verizon Communications's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Verizon Communications quarterly revenues are $33.3B, which are smaller than Alphabet quarterly revenues of $88.3B. Verizon Communications's net income of $3.3B is lower than Alphabet's net income of $26.3B. Notably, Verizon Communications's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.78x while Alphabet's PE ratio is 25.93x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Verizon Communications is 1.22x versus 7.32x for Alphabet. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lumen Technologies has a net margin of 9.92% compared to Verizon Communications's net margin of -4.6%. Verizon Communications's return on equity of 10.12% beat Lumen Technologies's return on equity of -270.39%.

Verizon Communications has a consensus price target of $47.50, signalling upside risk potential of 22.04%. On the other hand Lumen Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $1.57 which suggests that it could fall by -5.08%. Given that Verizon Communications has higher upside potential than Lumen Technologies, analysts believe Verizon Communications is more attractive than Lumen Technologies.

Verizon Communications has a beta of 0.456, which suggesting that the stock is 54.357% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lumen Technologies has a beta of 1.288, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 28.811%.

Verizon Communications has a quarterly dividend of $0.68 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.87%. Lumen Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Verizon Communications pays 94.93% of its earnings as a dividend. Lumen Technologies pays out -0.11% of its earnings as a dividend. Verizon Communications's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Verizon Communications quarterly revenues are $33.3B, which are larger than Lumen Technologies quarterly revenues of $3.2B. Verizon Communications's net income of $3.3B is higher than Lumen Technologies's net income of -$148M. Notably, Verizon Communications's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.78x while Lumen Technologies's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Verizon Communications is 1.22x versus 0.41x for Lumen Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Meta Platforms has a net margin of 9.92% compared to Verizon Communications's net margin of 38.65%. Verizon Communications's return on equity of 10.12% beat Meta Platforms's return on equity of 36.21%.

Verizon Communications has a consensus price target of $47.50, signalling upside risk potential of 22.04%. On the other hand Meta Platforms has an analysts' consensus of $658.65 which suggests that it could grow by 6.6%. Given that Verizon Communications has higher upside potential than Meta Platforms, analysts believe Verizon Communications is more attractive than Meta Platforms.

Verizon Communications has a beta of 0.456, which suggesting that the stock is 54.357% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Meta Platforms has a beta of 1.192, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 19.168%.

Verizon Communications has a quarterly dividend of $0.68 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.87%. Meta Platforms offers a yield of 0.32% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. Verizon Communications pays 94.93% of its earnings as a dividend. Meta Platforms pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Verizon Communications's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Verizon Communications quarterly revenues are $33.3B, which are smaller than Meta Platforms quarterly revenues of $40.6B. Verizon Communications's net income of $3.3B is lower than Meta Platforms's net income of $15.7B. Notably, Verizon Communications's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.78x while Meta Platforms's PE ratio is 29.10x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Verizon Communications is 1.22x versus 10.36x for Meta Platforms. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Netflix has a net margin of 9.92% compared to Verizon Communications's net margin of 24.06%. Verizon Communications's return on equity of 10.12% beat Netflix's return on equity of 35.73%.

Verizon Communications has a consensus price target of $47.50, signalling upside risk potential of 22.04%. On the other hand Netflix has an analysts' consensus of $845.73 which suggests that it could fall by -3.81%. Given that Verizon Communications has higher upside potential than Netflix, analysts believe Verizon Communications is more attractive than Netflix.

Verizon Communications has a beta of 0.456, which suggesting that the stock is 54.357% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Netflix has a beta of 1.266, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.567%.

Verizon Communications has a quarterly dividend of $0.68 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.87%. Netflix offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Verizon Communications pays 94.93% of its earnings as a dividend. Netflix pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Verizon Communications's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Verizon Communications quarterly revenues are $33.3B, which are larger than Netflix quarterly revenues of $9.8B. Verizon Communications's net income of $3.3B is higher than Netflix's net income of $2.4B. Notably, Verizon Communications's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.78x while Netflix's PE ratio is 49.76x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Verizon Communications is 1.22x versus 10.31x for Netflix. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.