META Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Alphabet has a net margin of 43.07% compared to Meta Platforms's net margin of 27.51%. Meta Platforms's return on equity of 38.66% beat Alphabet's return on equity of 33.02%.

Meta Platforms has a consensus price target of $729.26, signalling upside risk potential of 45.18%. On the other hand Alphabet has an analysts' consensus of $206.82 which suggests that it could grow by 34.89%. Given that Meta Platforms has higher upside potential than Alphabet, analysts believe Meta Platforms is more attractive than Alphabet.

Meta Platforms has a beta of 1.279, which suggesting that the stock is 27.917% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Alphabet has a beta of 1.032, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.196%.

Meta Platforms has a quarterly dividend of $0.53 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.4%. Alphabet offers a yield of 0.52% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share. Meta Platforms pays 8.13% of its earnings as a dividend. Alphabet pays out 7.35% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Meta Platforms quarterly revenues are $48.4B, which are smaller than Alphabet quarterly revenues of $96.5B. Meta Platforms's net income of $20.8B is lower than Alphabet's net income of $26.5B. Notably, Meta Platforms's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.00x while Alphabet's PE ratio is 19.05x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Meta Platforms is 7.97x versus 5.55x for Alphabet. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Pinterest has a net margin of 43.07% compared to Meta Platforms's net margin of 3.4%. Meta Platforms's return on equity of 38.66% beat Pinterest's return on equity of 54.52%.

Meta Platforms has a consensus price target of $729.26, signalling upside risk potential of 45.18%. On the other hand Pinterest has an analysts' consensus of $42.04 which suggests that it could grow by 66.69%. Given that Pinterest has higher upside potential than Meta Platforms, analysts believe Pinterest is more attractive than Meta Platforms.

Meta Platforms has a beta of 1.279, which suggesting that the stock is 27.917% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Pinterest has a beta of 0.986, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.376%.

Meta Platforms has a quarterly dividend of $0.53 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.4%. Pinterest offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Meta Platforms pays 8.13% of its earnings as a dividend. Pinterest pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Meta Platforms's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Meta Platforms quarterly revenues are $48.4B, which are larger than Pinterest quarterly revenues of $1.2B. Meta Platforms's net income of $20.8B is higher than Pinterest's net income of $1.8B. Notably, Meta Platforms's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.00x while Pinterest's PE ratio is 9.46x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Meta Platforms is 7.97x versus 4.83x for Pinterest. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Rumble has a net margin of 43.07% compared to Meta Platforms's net margin of -783.22%. Meta Platforms's return on equity of 38.66% beat Rumble's return on equity of -223.19%.

Meta Platforms has a consensus price target of $729.26, signalling upside risk potential of 45.18%. On the other hand Rumble has an analysts' consensus of $14.00 which suggests that it could grow by 97.74%. Given that Rumble has higher upside potential than Meta Platforms, analysts believe Rumble is more attractive than Meta Platforms.

Meta Platforms has a beta of 1.279, which suggesting that the stock is 27.917% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Rumble has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Meta Platforms has a quarterly dividend of $0.53 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.4%. Rumble offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Meta Platforms pays 8.13% of its earnings as a dividend. Rumble pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Meta Platforms's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Meta Platforms quarterly revenues are $48.4B, which are larger than Rumble quarterly revenues of $30.2M. Meta Platforms's net income of $20.8B is higher than Rumble's net income of -$236.8M. Notably, Meta Platforms's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.00x while Rumble's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Meta Platforms is 7.97x versus 15.13x for Rumble. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Snap has a net margin of 43.07% compared to Meta Platforms's net margin of 0.58%. Meta Platforms's return on equity of 38.66% beat Snap's return on equity of -30.95%.

Meta Platforms has a consensus price target of $729.26, signalling upside risk potential of 45.18%. On the other hand Snap has an analysts' consensus of $11.75 which suggests that it could grow by 52.52%. Given that Snap has higher upside potential than Meta Platforms, analysts believe Snap is more attractive than Meta Platforms.

Meta Platforms has a beta of 1.279, which suggesting that the stock is 27.917% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Snap has a beta of 0.921, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.946%.

Meta Platforms has a quarterly dividend of $0.53 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.4%. Snap offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Meta Platforms pays 8.13% of its earnings as a dividend. Snap pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Meta Platforms's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Meta Platforms quarterly revenues are $48.4B, which are larger than Snap quarterly revenues of $1.6B. Meta Platforms's net income of $20.8B is higher than Snap's net income of $9.1M. Notably, Meta Platforms's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.00x while Snap's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Meta Platforms is 7.97x versus 2.40x for Snap. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.