META Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Alphabet has a net margin of 38.65% compared to Meta Platforms's net margin of 29.8%. Meta Platforms's return on equity of 36.21% beat Alphabet's return on equity of 32.19%.

Meta Platforms has a consensus price target of $658.65, signalling upside risk potential of 6.6%. On the other hand Alphabet has an analysts' consensus of $211.35 which suggests that it could grow by 8.12%. Given that Alphabet has higher upside potential than Meta Platforms, analysts believe Alphabet is more attractive than Meta Platforms.

Meta Platforms has a beta of 1.192, which suggesting that the stock is 19.168% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Alphabet has a beta of 0.980, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.965%.

Meta Platforms has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.32%. Alphabet offers a yield of 0.31% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share. Meta Platforms pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Alphabet pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Meta Platforms quarterly revenues are $40.6B, which are smaller than Alphabet quarterly revenues of $88.3B. Meta Platforms's net income of $15.7B is lower than Alphabet's net income of $26.3B. Notably, Meta Platforms's price-to-earnings ratio is 29.10x while Alphabet's PE ratio is 25.93x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Meta Platforms is 10.36x versus 7.32x for Alphabet. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Netflix has a net margin of 38.65% compared to Meta Platforms's net margin of 24.06%. Meta Platforms's return on equity of 36.21% beat Netflix's return on equity of 35.73%.

Meta Platforms has a consensus price target of $658.65, signalling upside risk potential of 6.6%. On the other hand Netflix has an analysts' consensus of $845.73 which suggests that it could fall by -3.81%. Given that Meta Platforms has higher upside potential than Netflix, analysts believe Meta Platforms is more attractive than Netflix.

Meta Platforms has a beta of 1.192, which suggesting that the stock is 19.168% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Netflix has a beta of 1.266, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.567%.

Meta Platforms has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.32%. Netflix offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Meta Platforms pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Netflix pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Meta Platforms quarterly revenues are $40.6B, which are larger than Netflix quarterly revenues of $9.8B. Meta Platforms's net income of $15.7B is higher than Netflix's net income of $2.4B. Notably, Meta Platforms's price-to-earnings ratio is 29.10x while Netflix's PE ratio is 49.76x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Meta Platforms is 10.36x versus 10.31x for Netflix. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Pinterest has a net margin of 38.65% compared to Meta Platforms's net margin of 3.4%. Meta Platforms's return on equity of 36.21% beat Pinterest's return on equity of 7.13%.

Meta Platforms has a consensus price target of $658.65, signalling upside risk potential of 6.6%. On the other hand Pinterest has an analysts' consensus of $39.64 which suggests that it could grow by 24.62%. Given that Pinterest has higher upside potential than Meta Platforms, analysts believe Pinterest is more attractive than Meta Platforms.

Meta Platforms has a beta of 1.192, which suggesting that the stock is 19.168% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Pinterest has a beta of 1.036, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.595%.

Meta Platforms has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.32%. Pinterest offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Meta Platforms pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Pinterest pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Meta Platforms quarterly revenues are $40.6B, which are larger than Pinterest quarterly revenues of $898.4M. Meta Platforms's net income of $15.7B is higher than Pinterest's net income of $30.6M. Notably, Meta Platforms's price-to-earnings ratio is 29.10x while Pinterest's PE ratio is 102.61x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Meta Platforms is 10.36x versus 6.31x for Pinterest. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Snap has a net margin of 38.65% compared to Meta Platforms's net margin of -11.17%. Meta Platforms's return on equity of 36.21% beat Snap's return on equity of -42.21%.

Meta Platforms has a consensus price target of $658.65, signalling upside risk potential of 6.6%. On the other hand Snap has an analysts' consensus of $13.18 which suggests that it could grow by 4.28%. Given that Meta Platforms has higher upside potential than Snap, analysts believe Meta Platforms is more attractive than Snap.

Meta Platforms has a beta of 1.192, which suggesting that the stock is 19.168% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Snap has a beta of 0.983, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.706%.

Meta Platforms has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.32%. Snap offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Meta Platforms pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Snap pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Meta Platforms quarterly revenues are $40.6B, which are larger than Snap quarterly revenues of $1.4B. Meta Platforms's net income of $15.7B is higher than Snap's net income of -$153.2M. Notably, Meta Platforms's price-to-earnings ratio is 29.10x while Snap's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Meta Platforms is 10.36x versus 4.01x for Snap. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.