UNM Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Allstate has a net margin of 10.88% compared to Unum Group's net margin of 11.68%. Unum Group's return on equity of 17.03% beat Allstate's return on equity of 24.09%.

Unum Group has a consensus price target of $91.85, signalling upside risk potential of 16.51%. On the other hand Allstate has an analysts' consensus of $225.06 which suggests that it could grow by 8.47%. Given that Unum Group has higher upside potential than Allstate, analysts believe Unum Group is more attractive than Allstate.

Unum Group has a beta of 0.745, which suggesting that the stock is 25.503% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Allstate has a beta of 0.472, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 52.839%.

Unum Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.42 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.06%. Allstate offers a yield of 1.81% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.00 per share. Unum Group pays 16.67% of its earnings as a dividend. Allstate pays out 23.12% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Unum Group quarterly revenues are $3.2B, which are smaller than Allstate quarterly revenues of $16.5B. Unum Group's net income of $348.7M is lower than Allstate's net income of $1.9B. Notably, Unum Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.32x while Allstate's PE ratio is 12.21x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Unum Group is 1.16x versus 0.87x for Allstate. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

CNO Financial Group has a net margin of 10.88% compared to Unum Group's net margin of 15.14%. Unum Group's return on equity of 17.03% beat CNO Financial Group's return on equity of 16.56%.

Unum Group has a consensus price target of $91.85, signalling upside risk potential of 16.51%. On the other hand CNO Financial Group has an analysts' consensus of $43.50 which suggests that it could grow by 8.61%. Given that Unum Group has higher upside potential than CNO Financial Group, analysts believe Unum Group is more attractive than CNO Financial Group.

Unum Group has a beta of 0.745, which suggesting that the stock is 25.503% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CNO Financial Group has a beta of 1.025, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.487%.

Unum Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.42 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.06%. CNO Financial Group offers a yield of 1.6% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share. Unum Group pays 16.67% of its earnings as a dividend. CNO Financial Group pays out 16.76% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Unum Group quarterly revenues are $3.2B, which are larger than CNO Financial Group quarterly revenues of $1.1B. Unum Group's net income of $348.7M is higher than CNO Financial Group's net income of $166.1M. Notably, Unum Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.32x while CNO Financial Group's PE ratio is 10.71x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Unum Group is 1.16x versus 0.97x for CNO Financial Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lincoln National has a net margin of 10.88% compared to Unum Group's net margin of 33.18%. Unum Group's return on equity of 17.03% beat Lincoln National's return on equity of 41.29%.

Unum Group has a consensus price target of $91.85, signalling upside risk potential of 16.51%. On the other hand Lincoln National has an analysts' consensus of $39.18 which suggests that it could grow by 8.57%. Given that Unum Group has higher upside potential than Lincoln National, analysts believe Unum Group is more attractive than Lincoln National.

Unum Group has a beta of 0.745, which suggesting that the stock is 25.503% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lincoln National has a beta of 1.764, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 76.426%.

Unum Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.42 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.06%. Lincoln National offers a yield of 4.99% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share. Unum Group pays 16.67% of its earnings as a dividend. Lincoln National pays out 12.15% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Unum Group quarterly revenues are $3.2B, which are smaller than Lincoln National quarterly revenues of $5.1B. Unum Group's net income of $348.7M is lower than Lincoln National's net income of $1.7B. Notably, Unum Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.32x while Lincoln National's PE ratio is 1.96x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Unum Group is 1.16x versus 0.35x for Lincoln National. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Voya Financial has a net margin of 10.88% compared to Unum Group's net margin of 4.93%. Unum Group's return on equity of 17.03% beat Voya Financial's return on equity of 10.98%.

Unum Group has a consensus price target of $91.85, signalling upside risk potential of 16.51%. On the other hand Voya Financial has an analysts' consensus of $81.58 which suggests that it could grow by 22.08%. Given that Voya Financial has higher upside potential than Unum Group, analysts believe Voya Financial is more attractive than Unum Group.

Unum Group has a beta of 0.745, which suggesting that the stock is 25.503% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Voya Financial has a beta of 1.027, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.694%.

Unum Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.42 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.06%. Voya Financial offers a yield of 2.62% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share. Unum Group pays 16.67% of its earnings as a dividend. Voya Financial pays out 31.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Unum Group quarterly revenues are $3.2B, which are larger than Voya Financial quarterly revenues of $2B. Unum Group's net income of $348.7M is higher than Voya Financial's net income of $97M. Notably, Unum Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.32x while Voya Financial's PE ratio is 10.92x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Unum Group is 1.16x versus 0.86x for Voya Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.