AFL Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

AMERISAFE has a net margin of 34.59% compared to Aflac's net margin of 17.82%. Aflac's return on equity of 22.22% beat AMERISAFE's return on equity of 18.9%.

Aflac has a consensus price target of $105.07, signalling downside risk potential of -2.03%. On the other hand AMERISAFE has an analysts' consensus of $56.33 which suggests that it could grow by 10.03%. Given that AMERISAFE has higher upside potential than Aflac, analysts believe AMERISAFE is more attractive than Aflac.

Aflac has a beta of 0.934, which suggesting that the stock is 6.56% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison AMERISAFE has a beta of 0.331, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 66.941%.

Aflac has a quarterly dividend of $0.58 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.94%. AMERISAFE offers a yield of 2.93% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.39 per share. Aflac pays 19.97% of its earnings as a dividend. AMERISAFE pays out 154.12% of its earnings as a dividend. Aflac's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but AMERISAFE's is not.

Aflac quarterly revenues are $5.5B, which are larger than AMERISAFE quarterly revenues of $74M. Aflac's net income of $1.9B is higher than AMERISAFE's net income of $13.2M. Notably, Aflac's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.17x while AMERISAFE's PE ratio is 17.72x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Aflac is 3.17x versus 3.17x for AMERISAFE. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Employers Holdings has a net margin of 34.59% compared to Aflac's net margin of 13.07%. Aflac's return on equity of 22.22% beat Employers Holdings's return on equity of 11.37%.

Aflac has a consensus price target of $105.07, signalling downside risk potential of -2.03%. On the other hand Employers Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $56.00 which suggests that it could grow by 13.68%. Given that Employers Holdings has higher upside potential than Aflac, analysts believe Employers Holdings is more attractive than Aflac.

Aflac has a beta of 0.934, which suggesting that the stock is 6.56% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Employers Holdings has a beta of 0.210, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 78.953%.

Aflac has a quarterly dividend of $0.58 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.94%. Employers Holdings offers a yield of 2.39% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share. Aflac pays 19.97% of its earnings as a dividend. Employers Holdings pays out 25.55% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Aflac quarterly revenues are $5.5B, which are larger than Employers Holdings quarterly revenues of $216.6M. Aflac's net income of $1.9B is higher than Employers Holdings's net income of $28.3M. Notably, Aflac's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.17x while Employers Holdings's PE ratio is 10.65x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Aflac is 3.17x versus 1.43x for Employers Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

MetLife has a net margin of 34.59% compared to Aflac's net margin of 6.92%. Aflac's return on equity of 22.22% beat MetLife's return on equity of 15.21%.

Aflac has a consensus price target of $105.07, signalling downside risk potential of -2.03%. On the other hand MetLife has an analysts' consensus of $95.43 which suggests that it could grow by 18.68%. Given that MetLife has higher upside potential than Aflac, analysts believe MetLife is more attractive than Aflac.

Aflac has a beta of 0.934, which suggesting that the stock is 6.56% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MetLife has a beta of 1.045, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.545%.

Aflac has a quarterly dividend of $0.58 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.94%. MetLife offers a yield of 2.71% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.55 per share. Aflac pays 19.97% of its earnings as a dividend. MetLife pays out 39.02% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Aflac quarterly revenues are $5.5B, which are smaller than MetLife quarterly revenues of $18.4B. Aflac's net income of $1.9B is higher than MetLife's net income of $1.3B. Notably, Aflac's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.17x while MetLife's PE ratio is 13.48x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Aflac is 3.17x versus 0.82x for MetLife. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Unum Group has a net margin of 34.59% compared to Aflac's net margin of 10.88%. Aflac's return on equity of 22.22% beat Unum Group's return on equity of 17.03%.

Aflac has a consensus price target of $105.07, signalling downside risk potential of -2.03%. On the other hand Unum Group has an analysts' consensus of $91.85 which suggests that it could grow by 16.51%. Given that Unum Group has higher upside potential than Aflac, analysts believe Unum Group is more attractive than Aflac.

Aflac has a beta of 0.934, which suggesting that the stock is 6.56% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Unum Group has a beta of 0.745, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.503%.

Aflac has a quarterly dividend of $0.58 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.94%. Unum Group offers a yield of 2.06% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.42 per share. Aflac pays 19.97% of its earnings as a dividend. Unum Group pays out 16.67% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Aflac quarterly revenues are $5.5B, which are larger than Unum Group quarterly revenues of $3.2B. Aflac's net income of $1.9B is higher than Unum Group's net income of $348.7M. Notably, Aflac's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.17x while Unum Group's PE ratio is 8.32x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Aflac is 3.17x versus 1.16x for Unum Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.