TXT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Ducommun has a net margin of 6.51% compared to Textron's net margin of 5.04%. Textron's return on equity of 12.66% beat Ducommun's return on equity of 4.61%.

Textron has a consensus price target of $95.24, signalling upside risk potential of 25.31%. On the other hand Ducommun has an analysts' consensus of $82.00 which suggests that it could grow by 26.23%. Given that Ducommun has higher upside potential than Textron, analysts believe Ducommun is more attractive than Textron.

Textron has a beta of 1.270, which suggesting that the stock is 26.963% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ducommun has a beta of 1.416, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 41.586%.

Textron has a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.11%. Ducommun offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Textron pays 1.74% of its earnings as a dividend. Ducommun pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Textron's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Textron quarterly revenues are $3.4B, which are larger than Ducommun quarterly revenues of $201.4M. Textron's net income of $223M is higher than Ducommun's net income of $10.1M. Notably, Textron's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.66x while Ducommun's PE ratio is 32.64x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Textron is 1.05x versus 1.24x for Ducommun. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

General Dynamics has a net margin of 6.51% compared to Textron's net margin of 7.97%. Textron's return on equity of 12.66% beat General Dynamics's return on equity of 16.9%.

Textron has a consensus price target of $95.24, signalling upside risk potential of 25.31%. On the other hand General Dynamics has an analysts' consensus of $309.74 which suggests that it could grow by 19.13%. Given that Textron has higher upside potential than General Dynamics, analysts believe Textron is more attractive than General Dynamics.

Textron has a beta of 1.270, which suggesting that the stock is 26.963% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison General Dynamics has a beta of 0.614, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 38.616%.

Textron has a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.11%. General Dynamics offers a yield of 2.13% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.42 per share. Textron pays 1.74% of its earnings as a dividend. General Dynamics pays out 43.08% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Textron quarterly revenues are $3.4B, which are smaller than General Dynamics quarterly revenues of $11.7B. Textron's net income of $223M is lower than General Dynamics's net income of $930M. Notably, Textron's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.66x while General Dynamics's PE ratio is 19.91x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Textron is 1.05x versus 1.57x for General Dynamics. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lockheed Martin has a net margin of 6.51% compared to Textron's net margin of 9.49%. Textron's return on equity of 12.66% beat Lockheed Martin's return on equity of 92.37%.

Textron has a consensus price target of $95.24, signalling upside risk potential of 25.31%. On the other hand Lockheed Martin has an analysts' consensus of $576.12 which suggests that it could grow by 22.88%. Given that Textron has higher upside potential than Lockheed Martin, analysts believe Textron is more attractive than Lockheed Martin.

Textron has a beta of 1.270, which suggesting that the stock is 26.963% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lockheed Martin has a beta of 0.482, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 51.791%.

Textron has a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.11%. Lockheed Martin offers a yield of 2.72% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $3.30 per share. Textron pays 1.74% of its earnings as a dividend. Lockheed Martin pays out 44.16% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Textron quarterly revenues are $3.4B, which are smaller than Lockheed Martin quarterly revenues of $17.1B. Textron's net income of $223M is lower than Lockheed Martin's net income of $1.6B. Notably, Textron's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.66x while Lockheed Martin's PE ratio is 16.98x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Textron is 1.05x versus 1.59x for Lockheed Martin. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Moog has a net margin of 6.51% compared to Textron's net margin of 4.69%. Textron's return on equity of 12.66% beat Moog's return on equity of 11.84%.

Textron has a consensus price target of $95.24, signalling upside risk potential of 25.31%. On the other hand Moog has an analysts' consensus of $222.75 which suggests that it could grow by 9.85%. Given that Textron has higher upside potential than Moog, analysts believe Textron is more attractive than Moog.

Textron has a beta of 1.270, which suggesting that the stock is 26.963% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Moog has a beta of 1.190, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 19.048%.

Textron has a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.11%. Moog offers a yield of 0.55% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share. Textron pays 1.74% of its earnings as a dividend. Moog pays out 17.12% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Textron quarterly revenues are $3.4B, which are larger than Moog quarterly revenues of $917.3M. Textron's net income of $223M is higher than Moog's net income of $43M. Notably, Textron's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.66x while Moog's PE ratio is 31.63x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Textron is 1.05x versus 1.82x for Moog. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.