DCO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Howmet Aerospace has a net margin of 5.04% compared to Ducommun's net margin of 18.09%. Ducommun's return on equity of 4.61% beat Howmet Aerospace's return on equity of 25.92%.

Ducommun has a consensus price target of $82.00, signalling upside risk potential of 26.23%. On the other hand Howmet Aerospace has an analysts' consensus of $124.51 which suggests that it could grow by 8.22%. Given that Ducommun has higher upside potential than Howmet Aerospace, analysts believe Ducommun is more attractive than Howmet Aerospace.

Ducommun has a beta of 1.416, which suggesting that the stock is 41.586% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Howmet Aerospace has a beta of 1.462, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 46.207%.

Ducommun has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Howmet Aerospace offers a yield of 0.23% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. Ducommun pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Howmet Aerospace pays out 9.54% of its earnings as a dividend. Howmet Aerospace's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Ducommun quarterly revenues are $201.4M, which are smaller than Howmet Aerospace quarterly revenues of $1.8B. Ducommun's net income of $10.1M is lower than Howmet Aerospace's net income of $332M. Notably, Ducommun's price-to-earnings ratio is 32.64x while Howmet Aerospace's PE ratio is 43.91x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ducommun is 1.24x versus 6.51x for Howmet Aerospace. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

TransDigm Group has a net margin of 5.04% compared to Ducommun's net margin of 21.41%. Ducommun's return on equity of 4.61% beat TransDigm Group's return on equity of --.

Ducommun has a consensus price target of $82.00, signalling upside risk potential of 26.23%. On the other hand TransDigm Group has an analysts' consensus of $1,492.82 which suggests that it could grow by 16.42%. Given that Ducommun has higher upside potential than TransDigm Group, analysts believe Ducommun is more attractive than TransDigm Group.

Ducommun has a beta of 1.416, which suggesting that the stock is 41.586% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison TransDigm Group has a beta of 1.384, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 38.439%.

Ducommun has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. TransDigm Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $75.00 per share. Ducommun pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. TransDigm Group pays out 118.9% of its earnings as a dividend.

Ducommun quarterly revenues are $201.4M, which are smaller than TransDigm Group quarterly revenues of $2.2B. Ducommun's net income of $10.1M is lower than TransDigm Group's net income of $468M. Notably, Ducommun's price-to-earnings ratio is 32.64x while TransDigm Group's PE ratio is 50.09x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ducommun is 1.24x versus 9.33x for TransDigm Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Textron has a net margin of 5.04% compared to Ducommun's net margin of 6.51%. Ducommun's return on equity of 4.61% beat Textron's return on equity of 12.66%.

Ducommun has a consensus price target of $82.00, signalling upside risk potential of 26.23%. On the other hand Textron has an analysts' consensus of $95.24 which suggests that it could grow by 25.31%. Given that Ducommun has higher upside potential than Textron, analysts believe Ducommun is more attractive than Textron.

Ducommun has a beta of 1.416, which suggesting that the stock is 41.586% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Textron has a beta of 1.270, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.963%.

Ducommun has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Textron offers a yield of 0.11% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share. Ducommun pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Textron pays out 1.74% of its earnings as a dividend. Textron's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Ducommun quarterly revenues are $201.4M, which are smaller than Textron quarterly revenues of $3.4B. Ducommun's net income of $10.1M is lower than Textron's net income of $223M. Notably, Ducommun's price-to-earnings ratio is 32.64x while Textron's PE ratio is 16.66x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ducommun is 1.24x versus 1.05x for Textron. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Woodward has a net margin of 5.04% compared to Ducommun's net margin of 9.75%. Ducommun's return on equity of 4.61% beat Woodward's return on equity of 17.07%.

Ducommun has a consensus price target of $82.00, signalling upside risk potential of 26.23%. On the other hand Woodward has an analysts' consensus of $198.03 which suggests that it could grow by 8.74%. Given that Ducommun has higher upside potential than Woodward, analysts believe Ducommun is more attractive than Woodward.

Ducommun has a beta of 1.416, which suggesting that the stock is 41.586% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Woodward has a beta of 1.390, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 38.984%.

Ducommun has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Woodward offers a yield of 0.55% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. Ducommun pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Woodward pays out 15.63% of its earnings as a dividend. Woodward's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Ducommun quarterly revenues are $201.4M, which are smaller than Woodward quarterly revenues of $854.5M. Ducommun's net income of $10.1M is lower than Woodward's net income of $83.3M. Notably, Ducommun's price-to-earnings ratio is 32.64x while Woodward's PE ratio is 30.30x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ducommun is 1.24x versus 3.40x for Woodward. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.