TRIP Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Expedia Group has a net margin of 7.33% compared to Tripadvisor's net margin of 16.85%. Tripadvisor's return on equity of 4.17% beat Expedia Group's return on equity of 42.54%.

Tripadvisor has a consensus price target of $17.50, signalling upside risk potential of 15.96%. On the other hand Expedia Group has an analysts' consensus of $184.92 which suggests that it could grow by 1.35%. Given that Tripadvisor has higher upside potential than Expedia Group, analysts believe Tripadvisor is more attractive than Expedia Group.

Tripadvisor has a beta of 1.334, which suggesting that the stock is 33.373% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Expedia Group has a beta of 1.831, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 83.12%.

Tripadvisor has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Expedia Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Tripadvisor pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Expedia Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Tripadvisor quarterly revenues are $532M, which are smaller than Expedia Group quarterly revenues of $4.1B. Tripadvisor's net income of $39M is lower than Expedia Group's net income of $684M. Notably, Tripadvisor's price-to-earnings ratio is 62.46x while Expedia Group's PE ratio is 23.85x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Tripadvisor is 1.21x versus 1.91x for Expedia Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lindblad Expeditions Holdings has a net margin of 7.33% compared to Tripadvisor's net margin of 10.93%. Tripadvisor's return on equity of 4.17% beat Lindblad Expeditions Holdings's return on equity of --.

Tripadvisor has a consensus price target of $17.50, signalling upside risk potential of 15.96%. On the other hand Lindblad Expeditions Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $12.50 which suggests that it could grow by 36.93%. Given that Lindblad Expeditions Holdings has higher upside potential than Tripadvisor, analysts believe Lindblad Expeditions Holdings is more attractive than Tripadvisor.

Tripadvisor has a beta of 1.334, which suggesting that the stock is 33.373% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lindblad Expeditions Holdings has a beta of 3.111, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 211.114%.

Tripadvisor has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Lindblad Expeditions Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Tripadvisor pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lindblad Expeditions Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Tripadvisor quarterly revenues are $532M, which are larger than Lindblad Expeditions Holdings quarterly revenues of $206M. Tripadvisor's net income of $39M is higher than Lindblad Expeditions Holdings's net income of $22.5M. Notably, Tripadvisor's price-to-earnings ratio is 62.46x while Lindblad Expeditions Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Tripadvisor is 1.21x versus 1.01x for Lindblad Expeditions Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NextTrip has a net margin of 7.33% compared to Tripadvisor's net margin of -993.31%. Tripadvisor's return on equity of 4.17% beat NextTrip's return on equity of -317.98%.

Tripadvisor has a consensus price target of $17.50, signalling upside risk potential of 15.96%. On the other hand NextTrip has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -61.42%. Given that Tripadvisor has higher upside potential than NextTrip, analysts believe Tripadvisor is more attractive than NextTrip.

Tripadvisor has a beta of 1.334, which suggesting that the stock is 33.373% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NextTrip has a beta of 1.674, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 67.443%.

Tripadvisor has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. NextTrip offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Tripadvisor pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. NextTrip pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Tripadvisor quarterly revenues are $532M, which are larger than NextTrip quarterly revenues of $154.5K. Tripadvisor's net income of $39M is higher than NextTrip's net income of -$1.5M. Notably, Tripadvisor's price-to-earnings ratio is 62.46x while NextTrip's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Tripadvisor is 1.21x versus 10.40x for NextTrip. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Vacasa has a net margin of 7.33% compared to Tripadvisor's net margin of 13.2%. Tripadvisor's return on equity of 4.17% beat Vacasa's return on equity of -65.75%.

Tripadvisor has a consensus price target of $17.50, signalling upside risk potential of 15.96%. On the other hand Vacasa has an analysts' consensus of $2.88 which suggests that it could fall by -40.97%. Given that Tripadvisor has higher upside potential than Vacasa, analysts believe Tripadvisor is more attractive than Vacasa.

Tripadvisor has a beta of 1.334, which suggesting that the stock is 33.373% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Vacasa has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Tripadvisor has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Vacasa offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Tripadvisor pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Vacasa pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Tripadvisor quarterly revenues are $532M, which are larger than Vacasa quarterly revenues of $314M. Tripadvisor's net income of $39M is lower than Vacasa's net income of $41.4M. Notably, Tripadvisor's price-to-earnings ratio is 62.46x while Vacasa's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Tripadvisor is 1.21x versus 0.08x for Vacasa. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.