VCSA Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Expedia Group has a net margin of -30.52% compared to Vacasa's net margin of 9.39%. Vacasa's return on equity of -90.12% beat Expedia Group's return on equity of 49.71%.

Vacasa has a consensus price target of $2.50, signalling downside risk potential of -53.62%. On the other hand Expedia Group has an analysts' consensus of $208.22 which suggests that it could grow by 38.32%. Given that Expedia Group has higher upside potential than Vacasa, analysts believe Expedia Group is more attractive than Vacasa.

Vacasa has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Expedia Group has a beta of 1.653, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 65.349%.

Vacasa has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Expedia Group offers a yield of 0.27% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. Vacasa pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Expedia Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Vacasa quarterly revenues are $138M, which are smaller than Expedia Group quarterly revenues of $3.2B. Vacasa's net income of -$42.1M is lower than Expedia Group's net income of $299M. Notably, Vacasa's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Expedia Group's PE ratio is 16.63x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Vacasa is 0.09x versus 1.50x for Expedia Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Global Business Travel Group has a net margin of -30.52% compared to Vacasa's net margin of -2.71%. Vacasa's return on equity of -90.12% beat Global Business Travel Group's return on equity of -11.97%.

Vacasa has a consensus price target of $2.50, signalling downside risk potential of -53.62%. On the other hand Global Business Travel Group has an analysts' consensus of $10.43 which suggests that it could grow by 54.73%. Given that Global Business Travel Group has higher upside potential than Vacasa, analysts believe Global Business Travel Group is more attractive than Vacasa.

Vacasa has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Global Business Travel Group has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Vacasa has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Global Business Travel Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Vacasa pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Global Business Travel Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Vacasa quarterly revenues are $138M, which are smaller than Global Business Travel Group quarterly revenues of $591M. Vacasa's net income of -$42.1M is lower than Global Business Travel Group's net income of -$16M. Notably, Vacasa's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Global Business Travel Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Vacasa is 0.09x versus 1.29x for Global Business Travel Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Inspirato has a net margin of -30.52% compared to Vacasa's net margin of -3.62%. Vacasa's return on equity of -90.12% beat Inspirato's return on equity of --.

Vacasa has a consensus price target of $2.50, signalling downside risk potential of -53.62%. On the other hand Inspirato has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 193.33%. Given that Inspirato has higher upside potential than Vacasa, analysts believe Inspirato is more attractive than Vacasa.

Vacasa has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Inspirato has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Vacasa has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Inspirato offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Vacasa pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Inspirato pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Vacasa quarterly revenues are $138M, which are larger than Inspirato quarterly revenues of $63.1M. Vacasa's net income of -$42.1M is lower than Inspirato's net income of -$2.3M. Notably, Vacasa's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Inspirato's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Vacasa is 0.09x versus 0.09x for Inspirato. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lindblad Expeditions Holdings has a net margin of -30.52% compared to Vacasa's net margin of -16.86%. Vacasa's return on equity of -90.12% beat Lindblad Expeditions Holdings's return on equity of --.

Vacasa has a consensus price target of $2.50, signalling downside risk potential of -53.62%. On the other hand Lindblad Expeditions Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $15.33 which suggests that it could grow by 88.26%. Given that Lindblad Expeditions Holdings has higher upside potential than Vacasa, analysts believe Lindblad Expeditions Holdings is more attractive than Vacasa.

Vacasa has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lindblad Expeditions Holdings has a beta of 2.867, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 186.735%.

Vacasa has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Lindblad Expeditions Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Vacasa pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lindblad Expeditions Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Vacasa quarterly revenues are $138M, which are smaller than Lindblad Expeditions Holdings quarterly revenues of $148.6M. Vacasa's net income of -$42.1M is lower than Lindblad Expeditions Holdings's net income of -$25M. Notably, Vacasa's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Lindblad Expeditions Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Vacasa is 0.09x versus 0.71x for Lindblad Expeditions Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.