VCSA Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Consolidated Capital Of North America has a net margin of 13.2% compared to Vacasa's net margin of --. Vacasa's return on equity of -65.75% beat Consolidated Capital Of North America's return on equity of --.

Vacasa has a consensus price target of $2.88, signalling downside risk potential of -41.33%. On the other hand Consolidated Capital Of North America has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Vacasa has higher upside potential than Consolidated Capital Of North America, analysts believe Vacasa is more attractive than Consolidated Capital Of North America.

Vacasa has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Consolidated Capital Of North America has a beta of 13.003, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 1200.348%.

Vacasa has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Consolidated Capital Of North America offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Vacasa pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Consolidated Capital Of North America pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Vacasa quarterly revenues are $314M, which are larger than Consolidated Capital Of North America quarterly revenues of --. Vacasa's net income of $41.4M is higher than Consolidated Capital Of North America's net income of --. Notably, Vacasa's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Consolidated Capital Of North America's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Vacasa is 0.08x versus -- for Consolidated Capital Of North America. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Expedia Group has a net margin of 13.2% compared to Vacasa's net margin of 16.85%. Vacasa's return on equity of -65.75% beat Expedia Group's return on equity of 42.54%.

Vacasa has a consensus price target of $2.88, signalling downside risk potential of -41.33%. On the other hand Expedia Group has an analysts' consensus of $184.92 which suggests that it could grow by 0.8%. Given that Expedia Group has higher upside potential than Vacasa, analysts believe Expedia Group is more attractive than Vacasa.

Vacasa has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Expedia Group has a beta of 1.831, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 83.12%.

Vacasa has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Expedia Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Vacasa pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Expedia Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Vacasa quarterly revenues are $314M, which are smaller than Expedia Group quarterly revenues of $4.1B. Vacasa's net income of $41.4M is lower than Expedia Group's net income of $684M. Notably, Vacasa's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Expedia Group's PE ratio is 23.98x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Vacasa is 0.08x versus 1.92x for Expedia Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Inspirato has a net margin of 13.2% compared to Vacasa's net margin of 6.27%. Vacasa's return on equity of -65.75% beat Inspirato's return on equity of --.

Vacasa has a consensus price target of $2.88, signalling downside risk potential of -41.33%. On the other hand Inspirato has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 231.33%. Given that Inspirato has higher upside potential than Vacasa, analysts believe Inspirato is more attractive than Vacasa.

Vacasa has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Inspirato has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Vacasa has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Inspirato offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Vacasa pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Inspirato pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Vacasa quarterly revenues are $314M, which are larger than Inspirato quarterly revenues of $69.1M. Vacasa's net income of $41.4M is higher than Inspirato's net income of $4.3M. Notably, Vacasa's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Inspirato's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Vacasa is 0.08x versus 0.06x for Inspirato. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lindblad Expeditions Holdings has a net margin of 13.2% compared to Vacasa's net margin of 10.93%. Vacasa's return on equity of -65.75% beat Lindblad Expeditions Holdings's return on equity of --.

Vacasa has a consensus price target of $2.88, signalling downside risk potential of -41.33%. On the other hand Lindblad Expeditions Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 30.69%. Given that Lindblad Expeditions Holdings has higher upside potential than Vacasa, analysts believe Lindblad Expeditions Holdings is more attractive than Vacasa.

Vacasa has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lindblad Expeditions Holdings has a beta of 3.111, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 211.114%.

Vacasa has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Lindblad Expeditions Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Vacasa pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lindblad Expeditions Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Vacasa quarterly revenues are $314M, which are larger than Lindblad Expeditions Holdings quarterly revenues of $206M. Vacasa's net income of $41.4M is higher than Lindblad Expeditions Holdings's net income of $22.5M. Notably, Vacasa's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Lindblad Expeditions Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Vacasa is 0.08x versus 1.06x for Lindblad Expeditions Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.