SNA Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Cummins has a net margin of 21.53% compared to Snap-on's net margin of 4.95%. Snap-on's return on equity of 19.71% beat Cummins's return on equity of 37.07%.

Snap-on has a consensus price target of $333.88, signalling upside risk potential of 0.61%. On the other hand Cummins has an analysts' consensus of $389.74 which suggests that it could grow by 21.15%. Given that Cummins has higher upside potential than Snap-on, analysts believe Cummins is more attractive than Snap-on.

Snap-on has a beta of 0.990, which suggesting that the stock is 1.027% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cummins has a beta of 1.012, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.2%.

Snap-on has a quarterly dividend of $2.14 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.41%. Cummins offers a yield of 2.22% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.82 per share. Snap-on pays 38.93% of its earnings as a dividend. Cummins pays out 24.56% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Snap-on quarterly revenues are $1.2B, which are smaller than Cummins quarterly revenues of $8.4B. Snap-on's net income of $258.1M is lower than Cummins's net income of $418M. Notably, Snap-on's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.02x while Cummins's PE ratio is 11.42x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Snap-on is 3.77x versus 1.31x for Cummins. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

EnerSys has a net margin of 21.53% compared to Snap-on's net margin of 12.67%. Snap-on's return on equity of 19.71% beat EnerSys's return on equity of 18.25%.

Snap-on has a consensus price target of $333.88, signalling upside risk potential of 0.61%. On the other hand EnerSys has an analysts' consensus of $115.15 which suggests that it could grow by 20.55%. Given that EnerSys has higher upside potential than Snap-on, analysts believe EnerSys is more attractive than Snap-on.

Snap-on has a beta of 0.990, which suggesting that the stock is 1.027% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison EnerSys has a beta of 1.181, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 18.08%.

Snap-on has a quarterly dividend of $2.14 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.41%. EnerSys offers a yield of 0.99% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share. Snap-on pays 38.93% of its earnings as a dividend. EnerSys pays out 12.81% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Snap-on quarterly revenues are $1.2B, which are larger than EnerSys quarterly revenues of $906.2M. Snap-on's net income of $258.1M is higher than EnerSys's net income of $114.8M. Notably, Snap-on's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.02x while EnerSys's PE ratio is 11.82x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Snap-on is 3.77x versus 1.09x for EnerSys. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lincoln Electric Holdings has a net margin of 21.53% compared to Snap-on's net margin of 13.72%. Snap-on's return on equity of 19.71% beat Lincoln Electric Holdings's return on equity of 35.33%.

Snap-on has a consensus price target of $333.88, signalling upside risk potential of 0.61%. On the other hand Lincoln Electric Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $230.78 which suggests that it could grow by 21.14%. Given that Lincoln Electric Holdings has higher upside potential than Snap-on, analysts believe Lincoln Electric Holdings is more attractive than Snap-on.

Snap-on has a beta of 0.990, which suggesting that the stock is 1.027% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lincoln Electric Holdings has a beta of 1.179, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 17.887%.

Snap-on has a quarterly dividend of $2.14 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.41%. Lincoln Electric Holdings offers a yield of 1.51% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.75 per share. Snap-on pays 38.93% of its earnings as a dividend. Lincoln Electric Holdings pays out 34.79% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Snap-on quarterly revenues are $1.2B, which are larger than Lincoln Electric Holdings quarterly revenues of $1B. Snap-on's net income of $258.1M is higher than Lincoln Electric Holdings's net income of $140.2M. Notably, Snap-on's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.02x while Lincoln Electric Holdings's PE ratio is 23.37x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Snap-on is 3.77x versus 2.72x for Lincoln Electric Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The Middleby has a net margin of 21.53% compared to Snap-on's net margin of 11.08%. Snap-on's return on equity of 19.71% beat The Middleby's return on equity of 12.44%.

Snap-on has a consensus price target of $333.88, signalling upside risk potential of 0.61%. On the other hand The Middleby has an analysts' consensus of $180.00 which suggests that it could grow by 18.69%. Given that The Middleby has higher upside potential than Snap-on, analysts believe The Middleby is more attractive than Snap-on.

Snap-on has a beta of 0.990, which suggesting that the stock is 1.027% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Middleby has a beta of 1.723, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 72.308%.

Snap-on has a quarterly dividend of $2.14 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.41%. The Middleby offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Snap-on pays 38.93% of its earnings as a dividend. The Middleby pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Snap-on's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Snap-on quarterly revenues are $1.2B, which are larger than The Middleby quarterly revenues of $1B. Snap-on's net income of $258.1M is higher than The Middleby's net income of $112.3M. Notably, Snap-on's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.02x while The Middleby's PE ratio is 19.20x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Snap-on is 3.77x versus 2.12x for The Middleby. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.