IRM Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Equinix has a net margin of 6.57% compared to Iron Mountain's net margin of -0.62%. Iron Mountain's return on equity of 236.21% beat Equinix's return on equity of 6.34%.

Iron Mountain has a consensus price target of $116.13, signalling upside risk potential of 31.81%. On the other hand Equinix has an analysts' consensus of $1,025.40 which suggests that it could grow by 23.31%. Given that Iron Mountain has higher upside potential than Equinix, analysts believe Iron Mountain is more attractive than Equinix.

Iron Mountain has a beta of 0.978, which suggesting that the stock is 2.188% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Equinix has a beta of 0.954, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.569%.

Iron Mountain has a quarterly dividend of $0.79 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.25%. Equinix offers a yield of 2.1% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $4.69 per share. Iron Mountain pays 438.25% of its earnings as a dividend. Equinix pays out 201.6% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Iron Mountain quarterly revenues are $1.6B, which are smaller than Equinix quarterly revenues of $2.3B. Iron Mountain's net income of $103.9M is higher than Equinix's net income of -$14M. Notably, Iron Mountain's price-to-earnings ratio is 144.43x while Equinix's PE ratio is 97.26x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Iron Mountain is 4.23x versus 9.11x for Equinix. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Invitation Homes has a net margin of 6.57% compared to Iron Mountain's net margin of 21.71%. Iron Mountain's return on equity of 236.21% beat Invitation Homes's return on equity of 4.52%.

Iron Mountain has a consensus price target of $116.13, signalling upside risk potential of 31.81%. On the other hand Invitation Homes has an analysts' consensus of $36.82 which suggests that it could grow by 6.32%. Given that Iron Mountain has higher upside potential than Invitation Homes, analysts believe Iron Mountain is more attractive than Invitation Homes.

Iron Mountain has a beta of 0.978, which suggesting that the stock is 2.188% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Invitation Homes has a beta of 0.863, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.722%.

Iron Mountain has a quarterly dividend of $0.79 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.25%. Invitation Homes offers a yield of 3.29% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share. Iron Mountain pays 438.25% of its earnings as a dividend. Invitation Homes pays out 151.84% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Iron Mountain quarterly revenues are $1.6B, which are larger than Invitation Homes quarterly revenues of $659.1M. Iron Mountain's net income of $103.9M is lower than Invitation Homes's net income of $143.1M. Notably, Iron Mountain's price-to-earnings ratio is 144.43x while Invitation Homes's PE ratio is 47.44x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Iron Mountain is 4.23x versus 8.11x for Invitation Homes. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

KKR Real Estate Finance Trust has a net margin of 6.57% compared to Iron Mountain's net margin of 59.62%. Iron Mountain's return on equity of 236.21% beat KKR Real Estate Finance Trust's return on equity of 2.53%.

Iron Mountain has a consensus price target of $116.13, signalling upside risk potential of 31.81%. On the other hand KKR Real Estate Finance Trust has an analysts' consensus of $12.88 which suggests that it could grow by 21.58%. Given that Iron Mountain has higher upside potential than KKR Real Estate Finance Trust, analysts believe Iron Mountain is more attractive than KKR Real Estate Finance Trust.

Iron Mountain has a beta of 0.978, which suggesting that the stock is 2.188% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison KKR Real Estate Finance Trust has a beta of 0.886, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.434%.

Iron Mountain has a quarterly dividend of $0.79 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.25%. KKR Real Estate Finance Trust offers a yield of 9.44% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. Iron Mountain pays 438.25% of its earnings as a dividend. KKR Real Estate Finance Trust pays out 289.69% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Iron Mountain quarterly revenues are $1.6B, which are larger than KKR Real Estate Finance Trust quarterly revenues of $34M. Iron Mountain's net income of $103.9M is higher than KKR Real Estate Finance Trust's net income of $20.3M. Notably, Iron Mountain's price-to-earnings ratio is 144.43x while KKR Real Estate Finance Trust's PE ratio is 58.83x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Iron Mountain is 4.23x versus 4.74x for KKR Real Estate Finance Trust. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lamar Advertising has a net margin of 6.57% compared to Iron Mountain's net margin of -0.21%. Iron Mountain's return on equity of 236.21% beat Lamar Advertising's return on equity of 30.88%.

Iron Mountain has a consensus price target of $116.13, signalling upside risk potential of 31.81%. On the other hand Lamar Advertising has an analysts' consensus of $132.60 which suggests that it could grow by 14.37%. Given that Iron Mountain has higher upside potential than Lamar Advertising, analysts believe Iron Mountain is more attractive than Lamar Advertising.

Iron Mountain has a beta of 0.978, which suggesting that the stock is 2.188% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lamar Advertising has a beta of 1.339, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 33.853%.

Iron Mountain has a quarterly dividend of $0.79 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.25%. Lamar Advertising offers a yield of 4.87% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.55 per share. Iron Mountain pays 438.25% of its earnings as a dividend. Lamar Advertising pays out 160.06% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Iron Mountain quarterly revenues are $1.6B, which are larger than Lamar Advertising quarterly revenues of $579.6M. Iron Mountain's net income of $103.9M is higher than Lamar Advertising's net income of -$1.2M. Notably, Iron Mountain's price-to-earnings ratio is 144.43x while Lamar Advertising's PE ratio is 32.85x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Iron Mountain is 4.23x versus 5.39x for Lamar Advertising. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.